ISSUE-18: Dropping RDFa as a requirement?

dropping-rdfa

Dropping RDFa as a requirement?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Felix Sasaki

Opened on:

2012-05-10

Description:

See the "let's drop RDFa thread" in April and May
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Apr/thread.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012May/thread.html
Resolution at
NIF proposal at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012May/0102.html
Needs some coordination with Ontolex people, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012May/0025.html
Hence issue cannot yet be closed.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: [All] last call publication and moving ITS2 forward (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-08-16)
2. Re: [All] last call publication and moving ITS2 forward (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-08-16)
3. [All] last call publication and moving ITS2 forward (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-08-16)
4. Re: [Relevant for all] options for the RDF representation of ITS 2.0 (from finnle@tcd.ie on 2013-08-14)
5. Re: [Relevant for all] options for the RDF representation of ITS 2.0 (from karl.fritsche@cocomore.com on 2013-08-14)
6. Re: [Relevant for all] options for the RDF representation of ITS 2.0 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-08-14)
7. Re: [Relevant for all] options for the RDF representation of ITS 2.0 (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-08-13)
8. Re: [Relevant for all] options for the RDF representation of ITS 2.0 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-08-13)
9. Re: [Relevant for all] options for the RDF representation of ITS 2.0 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-08-13)
10. Re: [Relevant for all] options for the RDF representation of ITS 2.0 (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-08-13)
11. Feedback (Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation [ACTION-181]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-09-06)
12. Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation - feedback integrated [ACTION-181] (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2012-08-09)
13. Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation - feedback integrated [ACTION-181] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-08-09)
14. Re: [all] updated agenda for August 9, 2012, 14:00 UTC (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2012-08-09)
15. Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation - feedback integrated [ACTION-181] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-08-09)
16. Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation - feedback integrated [ACTION-181] (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2012-08-09)
17. [all] agenda for August 9, 2012, 14:00 UTC (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2012-08-08)
18. Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation - feedback integrated [ACTION-181] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-08-03)
19. Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation - feedback integrated [ACTION-181] (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2012-08-03)
20. Re: [all] Call for consensus on Entity - feedback integrated [ACTION-181] (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2012-08-02)
21. Re: [all] Call for consensus on Entity - feedback integrated [ISSUE-181] (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2012-08-02)
22. [all] Call for consensus on Entity (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2012-07-26)
23. Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-35 (named-entity-syntax-could-use-rdfa-and-microdata): Named entity syntax could use microdata and RDFa in HTML5, and a dedicated syntax in XML only [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from tadej.stajner@ijs.si on 2012-07-10)
24. mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-35 (named-entity-syntax-could-use-rdfa-and-microdata): Named entity syntax could use microdata and RDFa in HTML5, and a dedicated syntax in XML only [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-07-05)
25. Re: ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-06-11)
26. Re: ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2012-06-10)
27. Re: ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2012-06-10)
28. Update: MLW workshop Dublin Overview of issues to be discussed on 12-13 June (Tuesday-Wednesday) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-06-10)
29. MLW workshop Dublin: Overview of issues to be discussed on 12-13 June (Tuesday-Wednesday) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2012-06-07)

Related notes:

Display change log