This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Description In the remodeling of specification guidelines, one of the practice was recommending to put the normative language definition in the conformance section. Does the normative language should be defined under the conformance clause and only the conformance clause. Good Practice: In the conformance clause, define how normative language is expressed. It is not decided if it should be finally suppressed with a rewording of the another section or kept as it is. Comment Lofton Henderson: support the idea that it could stay where it is, as long as there is a link to it from the Conformance Clause. Dominique Hazaƫl Massieux: mean how "conformance requirements are expressed"; I don't know what we would mean by "normative language", e.g. how does "normative language" relate to "normative content" - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0083.html Closed after Lofton agreement
setting version to LC in case of future use