This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 7570 - what image formats must be supported?
Summary: what image formats must be supported?
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: XSLFO
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XSL-FO (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0 Working Draft
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Liam R E Quin
QA Contact: Mailing list for comments on XSL (XSl-FO)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-09-10 22:31 UTC by Liam R E Quin
Modified: 2010-02-17 07:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Liam R E Quin 2009-09-10 22:31:53 UTC
Should there be a list of image formats that "MUST" be supported, e.g. PNG?

What about formatters or devices that can't do images at all?
Comment 1 Liam R E Quin 2009-09-10 22:32:18 UTC
[taken from "Design Considerations" draft]
Comment 2 Klaas Bals 2010-02-17 07:09:28 UTC
I'm not sure this is a good idea. We don't put any constraints on the output format either, e.g. we don't say you mus support PDF or PNG as output format, nor do we specifiy anything about required fonts etc. So if we add PNG as required image, we'd risk getting into the other formats too. However if other people feel we need this because of real problems, I'm not opposed to this. (FYI Scriptura does supports PNG as image format).