This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
1. In both the SML and SML-IF specs, the mark-up for all references includes an unmatched <cite> tag. The intent of <cite> is that it used at the point of reference in the main text, not in the bibliography. So the corrective action is to remove the tag. 2. In section 4.3.1, item 1, the hyperlinks attached to "[local name]" and "[namespace name]" point to the definition of attribute information item in the XML Infoset spec. These links should point to the appropriate definitions in the XML Namespaces spec. 3. In the normative references of the SML spec, the first entry (for SML-IF 1.1) is missing the final period. Likewise, in the normative references of the SML-IF spec, the first entry (for SML 1.1) is missing the final period.
(In reply to comment #0) > 2. In section 4.3.1, item 1, the hyperlinks attached to "[local name]" and > "[namespace name]" point to the definition of attribute information item in the > XML Infoset spec. These links should point to the appropriate definitions in > the XML Namespaces spec. That appears to conflict with 2.1 (or we are using the same style of linking in two distinct cases): References to properties of information items as defined in [XML Information Set], such as [children], are notated as links to the relevant section thereof, set off with square brackets.
2009-04-13 telecon, see minutes for update to part 2. 1,3 approved. no need for further wg review expressed.
Fixed per comment #2. However, no <cite> tag was found in the source (#1 in comment #0).
Created attachment 686 [details] Evidence of cite tags. This attachment shows the source HTML of the SML spec currently live at http://www.w3.org/TR/sml/.
Reopening per comment #4.
Apparently the <cite> tags are added by the build process. In any case, these cite tags *are* matched by a </cite> tag. You can see the closing tag in the attachment in comment #4.
2009-04-20 telecon: ok to close; cite's are spurious but harmless