This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
When SML model documents are included in an SML-IF document, they may have associated digital signatures, and these signatures may become invalid if the enclosed documents are altered in certain ways. Should IF impose a requirement that, when documents are included in IF, they never need to be modified in a way not compatible with XML Canonicalization? Or should the above be allowed, and indicate that digital signatures are (should be) generated *after* the modifications are made? Or should IF not view this as a requirement and be silent about it?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4746 ***