This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
3 Full-Text Selections [1] "In the following the syntax" After "following", insert comma. [2] "A full-text selection specifies the possible full-text search conditions" Why just the "possible" conditions?
[1]: done [2]: left as is. Would you prefer "alternatives". Isn't that the "possibilities"? Best, /Jochen
(In reply to comment #1) > > [2]: left as is. > Would you prefer "alternatives". You mean, "A full-text selection specifies the alternative full-text search conditions" ? I don't think that's an improvement. To me, including the word "possible" suggests a distinction from "actual" (where the actual is a subset of the possible), which I don't think is the intent. If we just deleted "possible": "A full-text selection specifies the full-text search conditions" wouldn't that convey the right idea?
Hi Michael, this bug can be closed. The spec now contains the wording (as agreed upon in FTTF-153 telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-query-fttf/2007Sep/0013.html) A full-text selection specifies the conditions of a full-text search.