This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
looks like a typo slipped into emptyorderdecl-1. the test-suites expects error XQST0069, because of two empty order declarations: declare default order empty least; declare default order greatest least; but the test-case only consists of one empty order declaration and something that should have been one, but is in fact a syntax error (XPST0003). because of the description of the test-case the author certainly means: declare default order empty least; declare default order empty greatest; best regards Tobias
Tobias: Great catch. Thanks. Test fixed by using: declare default order empty least; declare default order empty greatest; Please close the bug if in agreement. Thanks, Carmelo Montanez
the fix hits the spot, best regards Tobias