This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
In section 3.2.7.3 on the order relation of dateTime, at B.1, it says: 1.. If P[i] and Q[i] are both not specified, continue to the next i 2.. If P[i] is not specified and Q[i] is, or vice versa, stop and return P <> Q This doesn't make any sense to me. When could P[i] or Q[i] be "not specified"? In dateTime all fields are specified. When things like gYearMonth appeal to the dateTime order, they do so by saying eg "the order relation on gYearMonth values is the order relation on their starting instants", so in this case also all fields are totally specified. I think the above two sentences should be deleted. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0044.html
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003AprJun/0020.html Discussed at the May 2003 f2f. Decided to classify as error w/erratum and come back later for detailed consideration.