This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Should the following description in XML Representation Summary: complexType Element Information Item be changed from: "2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process contents} and {annotation} are those of the complete wildcard, and whose {namespace constraint} is the intensional union of the {namespace constraint} of the effective wildcard and of the base wildcard, as defined in Attribute Wildcard Union (213.10.6)." to: "2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process contents} and {annotation} are those of the complete wildcard, and whose {namespace constraint} is the intensional union of the {namespace constraint} of the complete wildcard and of the base wildcard, as defined in Attribute Wildcard Union (213.10.6)." See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0083.html
Henry's response: Yes. Discussed at the Apr. 26 telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Apr/0084.html. Resolution: The WG resolved to classify R-87 as an error and instruct HST to draft erratum for R-87 substituting "complete wildcard" for "effective wildcard" in XML Representation Summary: complexType Element Information Item. Erratum E1-30 added.