This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Section 2.3.3, 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence. Point of clarity <role type="qname" />+ "Each Role Type is specified by the type attribute of the role element" What is the relationship between the type attribute of this <role> element, and the name attribute of <roleType> of section 2.3.1? Need a statement clarifying the relationship explicitly rather than just by example.
editorial
From meeting on 25-jan-05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01- 25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt Depends on the 1018 ? editorial.
Add: "This type attribute points to the name of a role element." same applies for 2.3.2
In section 2.3.3, 3rd paragraph, 2nd added sentence: The "qname" value of the <z>type</z> attribute of the <z>role</z> element MUST reference the name of a roleType. Also added same sentence to penultimate paragraph of section 2.3.2 Question: in section 2.3.3 <roleType name="Buyer"> . . . </roleType> <roleType name="SellerForBuyer"> <behavior name="sellerForBuyer" interface="rns:sellerForBuyerPT"/> </roleType> <roleType name="SellerForShipper"> <behavior name="sellerForShipper" interface="rns:sellerForShipperPT"/> </roleType> <roleType name="Shipper"> . . . </roleType> <relationshipType name="Buyer-Seller"> <role type="tns:Buyer" /> <role type="tns:SellerForBuyer" /> </relationshipType> <relationshipType name="Seller-Shipper"> <role type="tns:SellerForShipper" /> <role type="tns:Shipper" /> </relationshipType> <participantType name="Broker"> <role type="tns:SellerForBuyer" /> <role type="tns:SellerForShipper" /> </participantType> should the two rns: name prefixes be tns: or are they deliberately different?
Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1]. changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005Jul/0002.html
Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html