This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
There is no contraints indicating how relationships in enclosed and enclosing choreographies are related - should there atleast be a constraint that the two choreographies must share atleast one common relationship type? Regards Gary and Steve
From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Discussion deferred as deemed to be a technical issue.
Proposal from Gary Brown: Although I have asked Kohei for clarification on this, I actually think the text in the issue is pretty clear: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1102. "Cannot see why finalizer blocks etc. should not combine in them corresponding workunits --- the latter seem rather redundant in semantics (and examples). As far as I read, no repetition etc. seems possible in these blocks." He is saying why is only a workunit permitted inside a finalizerBlock? I can see no valid reason for this restriction, so I propose that we change this to be an 'activity'. The only changes I can see are in section 2.4.5: 1) Syntax to change from <finalizerBlock name="ncname" > WorkUnit-Notation </finalizerBlock> to <finalizerBlock name="ncname" > Activity-Notation </finalizerBlock> 2) Last paragraph in that section - suggested change would be to remove the sentence that talks about the workunit. 3) Obviously the schema would need to be updated The examples in 2.4.10 could be updated, but they are still valid using workunits. Regards Gary
URL for previous comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Mar/0035.html
Comments #2 and #3 DO NOT apply to this bug. They apply to bug 1102.
Discussed on March 29, 2005 conference call.
Steveand Gary have been informed of the group's decision [1] and we are awaiting confirmation. Category changed to LCC: Closed. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005May/0008.html
Issue raiser has confirmed the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005May/0009.html