Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
Janina: Call for consensus issues created - threshold not yet determined (see research questions archive)
well known breakout
<matatk> Calendar entry; links to GitHub issue for more info: https://
matatk: Update on breakout 'well known', recording to be made available. How to navigate to well known sites.
matatk: Several pages are well known in any given site, how do we expose them in a best practice way.
matatk: Will alert when recording is available.
Janina: we think that this is on the right track to work with the COGA request; this may be a wide scale adaption if we can socialize it? (not just COGA)
Janina: Can we publish this, socialize this, get it bubbled up to the collective consciousness?
New on TR
SHACL 1.2 Core
<Roy_Ruoxi> - tracker: w3c/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - spec: https://
SHACL 1.2 SPARQL Extensions
<Roy_Ruoxi> - tracker: w3c/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - spec: https://
Roy_Ruoxi: New documents for review on RDF - they are low level. Lisa (COGA) has concern around complexity.
Janina: We should advise Lisa that this is here and could be reviewed
Eric_Hind: Eric will push this to COGA to review if anyone can/wil
Spec review requests
Web Neural Network API
<Roy_Ruoxi> - issue: w3c/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - tracking: https://
Roy_Ruoxi: Web Neural Network API is low level but open to concerns or review.
Matatk: Good quality recommendations related to A11y on these documents would be welcome. Introducing high level ideas/concepts into these documents could be a good approach.
Matatk: The beginning approach in the doc, overview of use Cases ,ethical considerations, etc (section 2 (in part) ,4,5,6) would be good to review. Explainer is available
<matatk> gb, status
<gb> matatk, the delay is 15, issues are off, names are off, full issues are printed 10 at a time; and the repository is w3c/
ACTION: janina: to review WebNN
cleyra: Emailed some thoughts, matatk Will forward to the right place and people
Janina: We always want comments, an email to APA list is welcome.
Comment review requests
Alternative text for short-form video
<matatk> source: whatwg/html#11080
<matatk> tracking: w3c/
matatk: APA sourced comments should be by consensus - tracked issues in APA repository looks for APA perspective. Would be great if anyone would volunteer to read.
Matatk: Demelza and Janina will volunteer to review.
<matatk> How to link your GitHub and W3C accounts: https://
matatk: If you haven't done this linking process, please do. If there's an issue, connect with Matthew and Janina
matatk: Best test to see if things are in order, add a comment
Janina: Always welcome to make a comment again, a discussed, broader comment often carries more value.
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to ask does it need alt=""?
CSS Update (Paul)
PaulG: No new updates to share
Actions check-in
CSS Update (Paul)
<PaulG> https://
PaulG: Forms styling, how to make forms easier to pattern. Looks to reduce customization against browsers.
<Cley> Can someone share again Paul’s link?
PaulG: Note that for users with personal style sheets, this may allow more contiguous styling. But it is geared towards authors.
<PaulG> https://
<Cley> Cheers
Actions check-in
Other business
<matatk> TAG Design Review of ACT Rules Format 1.1: w3ctag/
matatk: Review for accessibility test rules - accessibility related commentary. This is now in a state to have additional comments and review on this thread - if there's A11y contributions after review, we can follow up.
Be done
rssagent, make minutes