IRC log of wcag2ict on 2025-01-09
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:59:26 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:59:30 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/01/09-wcag2ict-irc
- 14:59:30 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 14:59:31 [Zakim]
- Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference
- 14:59:32 [maryjom]
- zakim, clear agenda
- 14:59:32 [Zakim]
- agenda cleared
- 14:59:41 [maryjom]
- chair: Mary Jo Mueller
- 14:59:49 [maryjom]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:59:50 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/09-wcag2ict-minutes.html maryjom
- 15:00:05 [maryjom]
- Zakim, please time speakers at 2 minutes
- 15:00:05 [Zakim]
- ok, maryjom
- 15:00:36 [maryjom]
- agenda+ Announcements
- 15:00:40 [ShawnT]
- ShawnT has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:00:54 [loicmn]
- present+
- 15:00:57 [maryjom]
- agenda+ WCAG2ICT Phase 2 Work Statement
- 15:01:06 [ShawnT]
- present+
- 15:01:11 [maryjom]
- Agenda+ WCAG2ICT Explainer Outline
- 15:01:16 [maryjom]
- present+
- 15:01:34 [ChrisLoiselle]
- present+
- 15:01:37 [dmontalvo]
- present+ Daniel
- 15:01:50 [dmontalvo]
- present- dmontalvo
- 15:01:54 [maryjom]
- regrets: Shadi
- 15:02:45 [ChrisLoiselle]
- scribe: ChrisLoiselle
- 15:02:50 [mitch11]
- mitch11 has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:02:57 [mitch11]
- present+
- 15:02:57 [ChrisLoiselle]
- agenda?
- 15:02:58 [GreggVan]
- GreggVan has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:03:06 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Zakim, take up next
- 15:03:06 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Announcements -- taken up [from maryjom]
- 15:03:21 [GreggVan]
- present+
- 15:03:40 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Announcements. Mobile Accessibility Task Force is hoping for first public working draft of their document.
- 15:03:47 [GreggVan]
- q+
- 15:04:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg and I have expressed some concerns back in December. It incorporates WCAG2ICT , however extends some requirements.
- 15:04:53 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Chuck and I are talking through WCAG2ICT
- 15:05:12 [ChrisLoiselle]
- https://github.com/w3c/matf is the link for where Mobile Task force is capturing their work.
- 15:06:03 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg: This is my last WCAG2ICT meeting before I retire.
- 15:06:58 [ChrisLoiselle]
- I will be contributing to volunteer. I will post some links regarding AT everywhere.
- 15:07:27 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Happy Retirement!
- 15:08:14 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Glad you are sticking around, happy retirement, wish you the best!
- 15:08:34 [Sam]
- Sam has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:08:34 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Zakim, take up next
- 15:08:34 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, ChrisLoiselle
- 15:08:42 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:08:46 [maryjom]
- ack GreggVan
- 15:08:52 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Zakim, take up next
- 15:08:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- WCAG2ICT Phase 2 Work Statement -- taken up [from maryjom]
- 15:09:05 [maryjom]
- https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Ftask-forces%2Fwcag2ict%2Fwork-statement%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fdeploy-preview-942--wai-website.netlify.app%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Ftask-forces%2Fwcag2ict%2Fwork-statement%2F
- 15:09:17 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: I've placed the diff in IRC so we can go through it.
- 15:09:28 [maryjom]
- https://deploy-preview-942--wai-website.netlify.app/about/groups/task-forces/wcag2ict/work-statement/
- 15:10:22 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: I did some updates to various sections to match what we had listed the scope of work.
- 15:11:02 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:12:21 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Walks through the Status of Document, Objective, etc. while sharing her screen per the deploy preview link https://deploy-preview-942--wai-website.netlify.app/about/groups/task-forces/wcag2ict/work-statement/
- 15:12:59 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:13:05 [dmontalvo]
- q+
- 15:13:15 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: On status, does anyone have any further feedback?
- 15:13:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:13:22 [maryjom]
- ack dmontalvo
- 15:13:48 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: Maybe we change ensure to propose?
- 15:13:55 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:14:12 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: Not sure we can ensure.
- 15:14:27 [GreggVan]
- q=
- 15:14:38 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Rachael asked thus wanted to allude to that.
- 15:14:53 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: I would use propose content rather than ensure.
- 15:14:54 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:15:11 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:15:34 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg: We can't ensure future AG charters, but we can plan.
- 15:15:46 [maryjom]
- The WCAG2ICT Task Force plans that future AG WG charters include further maintenance of this important guidance.
- 15:16:25 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: I'm good with that edit.
- 15:16:26 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:16:56 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Moving on to Objective section. I modified last 3 paragraphs to be clearer.
- 15:17:34 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:18:10 [mitch11]
- q+
- 15:18:18 [mitch11]
- to wordsmith this: Phase 1 of WCAG2ICT also added new content that identifies problematic WCAG success criteria when applied to non-Web ICT
- 15:18:19 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Objective keeps open what the deliverable is per what the key content is.
- 15:18:20 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:18:28 [maryjom]
- ack mitch
- 15:18:45 [mitch11]
- proposed: Phase 1 of WCAG2ICT also added new content that identifies WCAG success criteria that are problematic when applied to non-Web ICT
- 15:19:17 [ChrisLoiselle]
- +1 to Mitch's edit
- 15:19:32 [loicmn]
- +1
- 15:19:38 [ChrisLoiselle]
- ?
- 15:19:40 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:19:41 [GreggVan]
- Q+
- 15:19:52 [maryjom]
- ack GreggVan
- 15:20:27 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg: I would like to edit Mitch's proposal. Adding "If applied verbatim" or something like that.
- 15:20:39 [loicmn]
- q+ to highlight minor editorial in first sentence of paragraph 4 of Objective
- 15:20:39 [mitch11]
- q+
- 15:20:54 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:20:58 [maryjom]
- ack loicmn
- 15:20:58 [Zakim]
- loicmn, you wanted to highlight minor editorial in first sentence of paragraph 4 of Objective
- 15:21:07 [Sam]
- +1 to mich without verbatim
- 15:21:15 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Loic: I have a later edit, I can wait
- 15:21:18 [maryjom]
- ack mitch
- 15:22:14 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mitch: I don't think we have language like verbatim in , as we are looking to apply as written so I don't prefer verbatim.
- 15:22:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:22:22 [GreggVan]
- q+
- 15:22:37 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Sam: Mitch captures the point I wanted to make.
- 15:22:40 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Q?
- 15:23:15 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg: We can take out verbatim part out. Mitch is right, we are identifying them. Perhaps "Some non-web ICT".
- 15:23:21 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mitch: I would be in favor of that.
- 15:23:22 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:23:36 [maryjom]
- Phase 1 of WCAG2ICT also added new content that identifies WCAG success criteria that are problematic when applied to some non-web ICT.
- 15:23:45 [loicmn]
- +1
- 15:23:48 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mitch and Gregg agreement on "some".
- 15:23:49 [dmontalvo]
- q+
- 15:23:49 [ShawnT]
- +1
- 15:23:50 [mitch11]
- +1
- 15:23:51 [ChrisLoiselle]
- +1
- 15:23:53 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:24:00 [GreggVan]
- +1
- 15:24:04 [maryjom]
- ack GreggVan
- 15:24:46 [dmontalvo]
- q-
- 15:24:48 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Loic: First sentence of last paragraph ... "to development content"
- 15:24:56 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:25:09 [maryjom]
- First sentence of last paragraph: Editorial change - In addition, the task force would like to develop content to address misunderstandings
- 15:25:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: I defer to Loic as we were reading same thing.
- 15:25:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:26:05 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg: Question on guidelines vs. success criteria are we including both?
- 15:26:25 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: We covered thus has old phase plus new phase , so yes to your question.
- 15:26:26 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:27:06 [mitch11]
- remove "and" from this bullet: address challenges in Open issues labeled WCAG2ICT (completed in Phase 1); and
- 15:27:19 [mitch11]
- q+ to say the above
- 15:27:27 [maryjom]
- ack mitch
- 15:27:27 [Zakim]
- mitch, you wanted to say the above
- 15:27:35 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Now reviewing scope of work.
- 15:28:21 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mitch: either have "and" everywhere or clean up the semi colon .
- 15:28:31 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Will edit to remove and everywhere
- 15:28:33 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:28:37 [maryjom]
- Clean up the ;and and last period out of the in-scope bullets.
- 15:29:08 [maryjom]
- Clean up semicolons too in that list.
- 15:29:32 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:29:41 [maryjom]
- s/that list./that list and the out-of-scope list.
- 15:30:02 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Moving on to approach section.
- 15:31:18 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Removed the liaison part as Chuck no longer attending regularly. We are sending AG our work still.
- 15:31:20 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:32:22 [ShawnT]
- q+
- 15:32:43 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:32:54 [maryjom]
- ack shawnT
- 15:33:13 [ChrisLoiselle]
- ShawnT: On "all publicly visible", should we link out to GitHub?
- 15:33:40 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: I think we can provide a link to that, yes.
- 15:33:48 [dmontalvo]
- q+
- 15:33:56 [Sam]
- +1 to Shawn comment. maybe the wcag2ict group main page on W3c
- 15:34:03 [ChrisLoiselle]
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict perhaps?
- 15:34:12 [ShawnT]
- .. on github
- 15:34:25 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: Need to be more clear on what we are referencing.
- 15:35:09 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Perhaps we remove public comment lists and no longer need a link.
- 15:35:10 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:35:41 [maryjom]
- Last paragraph of the approach section remove "through publicly available comment lists" from the first sentence.
- 15:36:06 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:36:16 [dmontalvo]
- ack me
- 15:36:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Moving to timeline section.
- 15:36:20 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:36:56 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Updated phase 1 deliverables what we accomplished , shared the diff file on her screen to showcase updates.
- 15:36:58 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:37:35 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Phase 2, scope of work link not showcasing , shows markdown
- 15:37:49 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:37:50 [maryjom]
- Timeline phase 2 - fixe scope of work section link.
- 15:38:37 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: To Daniel, do I need to update otherwise?
- 15:39:05 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: I made a comment on the PR for the markdown link on phase 2.
- 15:39:46 [GreggVan]
- q+
- 15:40:03 [PhilDay]
- PhilDay has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:40:20 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg: I want to make sure that the language doesn't exclude fixing something we've done in Phase 1.
- 15:40:23 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:40:43 [PhilDay]
- Apologies for my extremely tardy appearance.
- 15:41:07 [GreggVan]
- ack greggvan
- 15:41:17 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: It is included in scope of work section , just didn't want to repeat content
- 15:41:22 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Gregg: Perfect.
- 15:41:23 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:42:15 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Liaisons section . We are established, so updated that. Participants list is where this information is found.
- 15:42:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:42:28 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Communication and Participation sections were unchanged.
- 15:42:46 [mitch11]
- q+
- 15:42:46 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:43:18 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: estimated to complete by June 2023 needs to be updated
- 15:43:40 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Chris: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/wiki/Schedule-and-milestones has our updated dates, if helpful MaryJo.
- 15:43:44 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:44:12 [maryjom]
- Participation section, remove "estimated to complete by June 2023" from the first bullet.
- 15:44:42 [loicmn]
- loicmn has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:44:49 [loicmn]
- present+
- 15:44:54 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mitch: Minor edit on Liaisons. "Potentially Others" phrasing may be deleted as not necessary
- 15:44:56 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:45:14 [dmontalvo]
- q+
- 15:45:22 [maryjom]
- ack mitch
- 15:45:23 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: That was a remnant of establishment. Perhaps an option on phrasing.
- 15:45:24 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:45:50 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: Read this as other regulators , etc. So particular to this bullet.
- 15:45:51 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:45:57 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: Suggests to keep
- 15:46:01 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Will keep then.
- 15:46:02 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:46:11 [dmontalvo]
- ack me
- 15:46:59 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Facilitation section. To Daniel, can we remove the Liasson to AG WG?
- 15:47:04 [maryjom]
- Check with chuck on Facilitation section to maybe remove the bullet "Liaison to AG WG: one of the AG WG co-chairs".
- 15:47:17 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Daniel: Let us discuss with Chuck on removing this from Facilitation section.
- 15:47:17 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:47:33 [ChrisLoiselle]
- editors and patent policy does not change.
- 15:47:59 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: Perhaps we can come to an agreement once the editorials have been updated, that we can send to AG working group.
- 15:48:00 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:48:24 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:48:34 [maryjom]
- DRAFT RESOLUTION: Once all of the noted edits have been incorporated into the work statement, it is ready to send to the AG WG for review and approval.
- 15:48:38 [PhilDay]
- +1
- 15:48:39 [loicmn]
- +1
- 15:48:39 [ChrisLoiselle]
- +1
- 15:48:42 [mitch11]
- +1
- 15:48:43 [ShawnT]
- +1
- 15:48:53 [Sam]
- +1
- 15:49:07 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:49:12 [GreggVan]
- +1
- 15:49:22 [maryjom]
- RESOLUTION: Once all of the noted edits have been incorporated into the work statement, it is ready to send to the AG WG for review and approval.
- 15:50:16 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Zakim, take up next
- 15:50:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- WCAG2ICT Explainer Outline -- taken up [from maryjom]
- 15:51:11 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: On Explainer , we may not publish this as a document or we may.
- 15:51:41 [mitch11]
- q+
- 15:51:48 [ChrisLoiselle]
- What do folks think about adjusting to just provide introduction content through rest of document?
- 15:51:59 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: I'd like to give outline to AG so they can review.
- 15:52:07 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:52:49 [maryjom]
- ack mitch
- 15:53:07 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mitch: I am in favor of making it bare bones vs. drafting and writing at this point.
- 15:53:22 [ChrisLoiselle]
- I'm not sure explainer is write word at moment.
- 15:53:27 [PhilDay]
- +1 to potential confusion on the word explainer!
- 15:53:35 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:53:46 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mitch: This is not like the w3 explainer
- 15:53:48 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:54:50 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: We want to make sure we aren't giving guidance to policy makers.
- 15:55:32 [mitch11]
- q+
- 15:55:39 [ChrisLoiselle]
- q?
- 15:56:03 [mitch11]
- q-
- 15:56:15 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Mary Jo: I will send a follow up via email to respond
- 15:56:35 [ChrisLoiselle]
- I will send to the list
- 15:56:46 [brucebailey]
- brucebailey has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:56:55 [ChrisLoiselle]
- looking for +1 to send to AGWG
- 15:58:01 [ChrisLoiselle]
- Goal is to be on Tuesday's agenda and then get on with work.
- 15:58:28 [ChrisLoiselle]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:58:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/09-wcag2ict-minutes.html ChrisLoiselle
- 15:58:55 [loicmn]
- loicmn has left #wcag2ict
- 15:58:56 [PhilDay]
- Thanks all.
- 15:59:22 [maryjom]
- zakim, end meeting
- 15:59:22 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been loicmn, ShawnT, maryjom, ChrisLoiselle, Daniel, mitch, GreggVan
- 15:59:25 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2
- 15:59:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/09-wcag2ict-minutes.html Zakim
- 15:59:32 [Zakim]
- I am happy to have been of service, maryjom; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye
- 15:59:33 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wcag2ict
- 15:59:51 [maryjom]
- rrsagent, bye
- 15:59:51 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items