Meeting minutes
<janina> /join #rqtf
Agenda Review & Announcements
janina: Usual agenda, someone wants to add something?
matatk: Important discussions/ decisions in Agenda Point 5
TPAC 2024 Planning
<matatk> https://
janina: Wiki to our arranged meetings is ready, we will keep it up to date
janina: One highlight: WCAG 3 and the presentation of the proposed conformance model
janina: Another one on tuesday (9am California time): Important Epub meeting
<Zakim> matatk, you wanted to discuss health procedures
<matatk> Minutes, re EPUB questions: https://
matatk: Main questions for our agenda on the hybrid Tuesday at TPAC
matatk: Think we have answers for most; some q's are more open
<Zakim> matatk, you wanted to react to a previous speaker to discuss epub agenda
Fredrik: Is it likely that the WCAG will remain on schedule?
janina: Actually not sure, but right now they are on time!
matatk: Notes we asked in person attendees to maks;
matatk: It's makes most sense ofr us now
<matatk> https://
matatk: Masks from W3C will be available
<Zakim> matatk, you wanted to discuss TPAC health stuff (in the right order this time :-))
Task Force & Deliverables Updates
janina: Nothing new to report
<matatk> https://
<matatk> janina: Note that we will add a link to the slides - which are super important!
janina: Interesting discussion in RQTF about XR? Discussion about gaps and possibilities, see minutes
Explicit Review Requests-WebGPU
WebGPU and WebGPU Shading Language
<Roy> - https://
<Roy> - Working Draft: https://
<Roy> - https://
<Roy> - Working Draft: https://
Roy: Groups asked if we are fine with these documents. I think we are, they are quite low level
janina: Any concerns?
matatk: No concern, but I still want to look into it. I think before TPAC is doable
HR A11y Review Comment Tracker
[WCAG2ICT] Closed functionality list - suggested additions
<matatk> APA tracking issue: w3c/
<matatk> Original issue (raised by us during review): w3c/
<matatk> WCAG2ICT changes made: https://
janina: We had some suggestions for improvement and they have made some changes
(matatk shares his screen and shows the changes in GitHub, see links above)
[WCAG2ICT] Seeking clarity for key term 'underlying platform software'
<matatk> APA tracking issue: w3c/
<matatk> Original issue (raised by us during review): w3c/
<matatk> Related issue (rasied by Mitchell Evan): w3c/
<matatk> WCAG2ICT changes made (for Mitchell's issue 414): https://
<matatk> WCAG2ICT changes made (for our issue 465): removed 'underlying' from Note 1 under https://
<matatk> gb, off
[WCAG2ICT] Suggest slight clarification of audience and outcomes
<matatk> APA tracking issue: w3c/
<matatk> Original issue (raised by us during review): w3c/
<matatk> WCAG2ICT changes made: https://
matatk: Overall, I think they addressed our points very well. Does anyone have any concerns?(no concerns)
(... minute just above was for subtopic "Seeking clarity for key term 'underlying platform software')
<gb> matatk, issues and names were already off.
matatk: I again think this one is sufficiently addressed. Any concerns? (again no concerns)
matatk: I will accept the changes later
CSS Update (Paul)
<PaulG> w3c/
PaulG: Discussion about the visibility of the scrollbar
Actions check-in
Other business
janina: Please note that post TPAC, I think, maturity model will have a comeback before the end of the year. We need to start thinking about it, we will recharter next year
<PaulG> https://
PaulG: Illuminate turns complex science papers into short podcast, if someone is interested see Paul's link above
<Fredrik> Already having the NAUR, why not continue the Tolkenian AURs with AINUR?
<Fredrik> (the above then being meant for the AI user requirements - yeah, lots of backronyming required...)