13:46:19 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 13:46:23 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/08/30-rdf-star-irc 13:46:23 Zakim has joined #rdf-star 13:46:53 meeting: RDF-star Semantics TF 13:46:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:46:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/30-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 13:46:58 rrsagent, make logs public 13:46:59 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/6d0cd306-0be8-4267-865a-6272cc8d9da4/20240830T100000/ 13:46:59 clear agenda 13:46:59 agenda+ Discussion on having a more liberal use of reification properties as in https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22alternative-baseline%22, as opposed to have the strict well formed fragment with just rdf:reifies. 13:46:59 agenda+ Discussion on whether or not to limit the (abstract) syntax to have triple terms only in object position. 13:47:11 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:47:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/30-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 13:47:51 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/08/29-rdf-star-minutes.html 13:47:53 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/09/05-rdf-star-minutes.html 13:57:06 AndyS has joined #rdf-star 13:59:31 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 14:01:41 enrico has joined #rdf-star 14:01:54 present+ 14:01:57 present+ 14:02:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:02:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/30-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 14:02:44 tl has joined #rdf-star 14:02:44 present+ 14:03:19 william_vw has joined #rdf-star 14:03:28 present+ 14:03:31 present+ 14:03:35 present+ 14:04:53 Souri7 has joined #rdf-star 14:04:59 present+ 14:05:27 present+ 14:07:31 q+ 14:08:03 ack william_vw 14:09:59 q+ 14:11:05 william_vw has joined #rdf-star 14:11:38 ack pchampin 14:12:17 owl:sameAs a rdf:Property # so it may be in the intersection of ReificationProperty and "regular" properties...? 14:12:46 q+ 14:13:10 q+ 14:13:22 +1 for the Literal:ish view of triple terms 14:13:23 ack tl 14:14:55 q+ 14:15:05 ack william_vw 14:15:05 ack william_vw 14:15:07 q+ 14:16:55 owl:sameAs is used with blank nodes a lot (OTOH it's also very misused) 14:18:56 ack niklasl 14:19:46 pfps has joined #rdf-star 14:20:15 owl:sameAs rdfs:domain owl:Thing . 14:20:15 owl:sameAs rdfs:range owl:Thing . 14:21:35 q+ 14:21:39 ack enrico 14:22:45 ack tl 14:22:59 q+ 14:23:00 q+ 14:23:24 ack souri 14:23:50 I could live with the stricter syntactic restriction (noting that I am also for only allowing rdf:reifies at this point / for RDF 1.2). 14:24:20 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 14:24:34 q+ to discuss the notion of "minimal" as argued by Souri 14:28:06 ack gkellogg_ 14:29:22 q+ 14:30:35 ack pchampin 14:30:35 pchampin, you wanted to discuss the notion of "minimal" as argued by Souri 14:32:11 q+ 14:32:56 ack Souri 14:33:21 q+ 14:35:07 q+ 14:35:45 q+ 14:35:52 ack niklasl 14:39:06 acl tallted 14:39:14 ack tallted 14:39:55 q+ 14:40:05 q+ 14:40:26 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 14:43:25 ack enrico 14:45:21 ack andys 14:47:11 +1 SHACL. I meant to mention it. 14:48:21 q? 14:48:33 ack william_vw 14:51:02 pchampin sorry :_) 14:52:39 q? 14:52:41 q+ 14:55:10 ack souri 14:56:01 I very much hope that our non-REC guide to using RDF 1.2 reification covers good and bad patterns. 14:56:02 "warn when loading data that is inconsistent with previously loaded data" vs "warn when loading data that is internally inconsistent" vs "prevent loading data that is internally inconsistent" vs "let me load anything" (among other options) 14:56:32 q+ 14:56:35 such optional switches are (or should be) always viable. forcing any of these via spec seems not so viable. 14:56:43 ack pchampin 14:57:23 +1 to AndyS on good/bad patterns (adding to my draft notes) 14:58:03 q+ 14:58:29 +1 to pchampin on having additional layers cope with this 14:59:01 Souri has joined #rdf-star 14:59:05 present+ 14:59:10 present+ 14:59:34 q+ 14:59:43 I think that Souri's use-case is about one-to-many, not one-to-one 15:03:09 ack enrico 15:04:17 I don't see any reason to forbid/prevent subproperties of rdf:reifies (in RDFS, that is) 15:05:43 ack tl 15:06:52 ack souri 15:07:19 AndyS has joined #rdf-star 15:07:35 q+ 15:07:36 q+ 15:08:05 ... apart from semantics... 15:09:02 Souri2 has joined #rdf-star 15:09:04 present+ 15:09:21 ack pchampin 15:10:23 q+ 15:10:29 ack souri 15:11:37 ack niklasl 15:14:43 q+ 15:14:48 ack souri 15:15:20 q+ 15:15:23 q+ 15:16:22 We have a syntax for arbitrary predicates used with Triple Terms in Turtle: `:r :p1 <<(...)>>>` 15:16:29 gkellogg_ +1 15:16:38 +1 to gkellogg_ 15:17:16 I was thinking about a shortcut akin to :r | :s :p:o . 15:17:24 My point was a lot about the shorthands catering for the (so far) "understood/non-experimental" case. 15:17:28 s/:p:o/:p :o/ 15:18:15 Short cuts are to aide common usage patterns; trying to invent a short cut style that extends to arbitrary predicates would seem outside our scope. 15:18:40 q+ 15:18:42 :r [:p1] | :s :p :o . 15:19:07 or something along that line 15:19:11 gkellogg_ but that's what the annotation syntax does 15:19:11 ack enrico 15:19:23 (Best start adopting to the actual syntax: `:s :p :o ~ :r`) 15:20:33 `:s :p :o ~ :r` could result in a different predicate than `<<:s :p :o ~ :r>>` 15:20:42 :s :p :o ~ :r | :p1 . ? 15:21:14 May I say that I really really dislike the "~" syntax? 15:21:36 ack niklasl 15:21:41 ack pchampin 15:24:35 under datatype entailment: "RDF processors MAY treat an unsatisfiable graph as signaling an error condition, but this is not required." 15:24:37 https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-mt/#datatype-entailment 15:24:53 q? 15:24:54 +1 to PA 15:25:40 q+ 15:25:49 niklasl 15:25:55 ack niklasl 15:27:08 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 15:27:18 q+ 15:28:25 ack tl 15:29:01 `<<(...)>> a rdf:TripleTerm` 15:29:33 That can be entailed, but I see no need to write it. 15:29:52 true a xsd:boolean . 15:30:24 disallowing triple-term in position other than the object position (as a syntactic restriction in RDF) => none of the properties in the rdf:ReificationProperty class can have an inverse property 15:30:56 ex:nameOf owl:inverseOf foaf:name . 15:31:07 there is no requirement that every property must be invertable 15:31:28 +1 to PA's point: "20"^^xsd:decimal :ageOf :john . is not allowed in RDF 15:31:40 `rdf:TripleTerm is rdf:type of <<(...)>>>` 15:33:28 q? 15:33:35 q+ 15:33:46 ack niklasl 15:35:32 sadly, I have to bounce (already 5 past official end time) 15:35:39 q+ 15:36:25 "is rdf:reifies of" 15:36:38 ack tl 15:36:40 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:36:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/30-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 15:38:16 It's more of an "expressivity omission"...? 15:39:21 +1 to counter-examples 15:55:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:55:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/30-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:44:39 Zakim, end meeting 16:44:39 As of this point the attendees have been niklasl, TallTed, enrico, tl, gkellogg_, william_vw, pchampin, Souri, AndyS 16:44:41 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:44:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/30-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 16:44:48 I am happy to have been of service, TallTed; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:44:48 RRSAgent, bye 16:44:48 I see no action items 16:44:49 Zakim has left #rdf-star