Meeting minutes
<gb> /issues/112 -> #112
<gb> /issues/118 -> #118
<gb> /issues/155 -> #155
agenda
<gb> /issues/112 -> #112
<gb> /issues/118 -> #118
<gb> /issues/155 -> #155
New Business
Jeff: State of Texas, drafted a maturity model
Fazio: ISO document reviewed to compare with Maturity model
Jeff: These models are not interchangable
Fazio: We are prepparing for future issues
JenniferXZ: NBC universal will share a draft soon
GitHub Issue #112 Proposing adjusted structure for Outcomes, Proof Points, and Stages (back to previous proposal!)
<gb> Issue 112 Proposing adjusted structure for Outcomes, Proof Points, and Stages (back to previous proposal!) (by jake-abma)
Fazio: read the issue
Jeff: we had a discussion in 2022, formatting of assessment tool and we arrived at this version, pointing out that this is not relevant now
Jeff: We can comment by saying we have revised the document and ask to have a look
JenniferXZ: It is not clear how it is measured that level has moved up
<Fazio> Thank you, for your comment. We have taken it into consideration, along with other feedback from the public, and significantly revised the document. We believe that we have addressed your concern. If it still persists, please open a new issue
Fazio: Response- Thank you, for your comment. We have taken it into consideration, along with other feedback from the public, and significantly revised the document. We believe that we have addressed your concern. If it still persists, please open a new issue, and provide any supporting documentation, you would like
GitHub Issue #118 Knowledge and Skills - Proof Point Updates
<gb> /issues/118 -> #118
<gb> Issue 118 Knowledge and Skills - Proof Point Updates (by jake-abma)
Jeff, Fazio: It is covering most of the things in the latest version
AngelaBarker: Can we check wording once?
Fazio: Response- Thank you, for your comment. We have taken it into consideration, along with other feedback from the public, and significantly revised the document. We believe that we have addressed your concern. If it still persists, please open a new issue, and provide any supporting documentation, you would like
GitHub Issue ##130 Where to place "internal support" for MSE or dedicated A11Y Team?
<gb> Issue 130 Where to place "internal support" for MSE or dedicated A11Y Team? (by jake-abma)
Jeff: Issue raiser thought that levels are mapped to stages in generic sense
Fazio: Supporting employees may be implying training on accessiblity
Fazio: Proposing general response as before
RESOLUTION: Thank you, for your comment. We have taken it into consideration, along with other feedback from the public, and significantly revised the document. We believe that we have addressed your concern. If it still persists, please open a new issue, and provide any supporting documentation, you would like
GitHub Issue #155 Section 3.4: maturity also depends on how effective the ICT development processes are in producing accessible ICT.
<gb> /issues/155 -> #155
<gb> Issue 155 Section 3.4: maturity also depends on how effective the ICT development processes are in producing accessible ICT. (by jasonjgw)
Jeff: Most of the concern are addressed in proof point language
Jeff: What needs to be put on Matrix is unclear right now, need to recheck and frame it again
CharlesL: You can put all the information to map it to spreadsheet
Issue assigned to Jeff and CharlesL
<Fazio> assigned to charles and jeff: Thank you, for your comment. We agree that attention should be called to establishing metrics within dimensions. We will explore how to ensure that is incorporated.
RRSAgent: make minutes