Meeting minutes
Minutes
approved
Merged PRs
Ege: (goes through the list)
… minor changes
New Calendar page
Ege: some feedback
PR 495 - feat: use open-web-calendar to view the W3C calendar
Ege: not many things we can do for further improvement due to the library
WoT Adopters
Ege: would highlight WoT Adopters
McCool: would start with logistic questions first
Ege: Latest Status: Is the Marketing TF ok to have this as a CG topic? Marketing page can link to the CG page
… would hear opinions
McCool: maybe we can do brief catch-up
… don't want to put non-Members on our WoT Marketing page
… but OK with having them on the WoT CG page
… the question is if it's OK for the WoT CG to maintain the Adopter page
Ege: right
… I'm thinking about something like the JSON Schema page
Kaz: we should put together our expectations
… e.g., having WoT Adopters list
… possibly putting the page under www.w3.org/wot
… but maintained by the WoT CG
McCool: right
… also we should visually distinguish that page
… the URL could be www.w3.org/WoT/CG/Adopters
… then need to talk with the MarComm Team
Ege: yeah
… btw, currently, the CG page under www.w3.org/WoT mentions both the WoT CG and the WoT JP CG
McCool: should have a bit different logo for the CG area
Ege: don't think it would be nicer for the whole WoT Marketing
McCool: we need to negotiate with the MarComm Team
Ege: another possibility is putting the Adopter information under github.io ara of the WoT CG
McCool: another question is if we want to distinguish non-W3C Members from W3C Members on the Adopter page
… maybe W3C Members should have more visibility
Ege: like the JSON Schema page standards, consortium, open source foundation, etc., could be different categories
McCool: should define specific procedure too
Ege: from the CG viewpoint, can pick up candidates when they give talks during the CG meetings
Kaz: technically, this is kind of like a registry :)
McCool: good point
Kaz: would suggest Ege's note on the Marketing wiki to be copied to a separated MD on GitHub
… and we continue discussion to add further clarification to that
Ege: exactly
Kaz: we need to clarify the delicate points within the draft policy which require negotiation with the MarComm Team
… like who to maintain which part, URL, etc.
McCool: right
Kaz: like the UC submission, we should clarify our acceptance policy too
Ege: yeah
… for example, some of the WoT CG participants don't have GitHub accounts
McCool: need to leave...
Kaz: for today, would suggest we generate an initial draft policy/requirement based on today's discussion
… and continue the discussion via GitHub and following Marketing calls
Ege: ok
… regarding the domain name and ownership, can I ask the MarComm Team about those points now?
McCool: think so
Kaz: before sending the question to the MarComm Team, please send the draft to the group
Ege: will do
[adjourned]