11:29:06 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-marketing
11:29:11 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-wot-marketing-irc
11:29:12 <kaz> meeting: WoT Marketing
11:29:28 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Luca_Barbato
11:31:00 <McCool> McCool has joined #wot-marketing
11:31:13 <kaz> present+ Ege_Korkan
11:31:34 <kaz> agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#August_1%2C_2024
11:31:47 <kaz> regrets+ Daniel
11:31:51 <kaz> topic: Minutes
11:32:01 <kaz> -> https://www.w3.org/2024/05/02-wot-marketing-minutes.html May-2
11:33:52 <EgeKorkan> q?
11:33:59 <kaz> approved
11:34:25 <kaz> toic: Merged PRs
11:34:31 <kaz> s/toic/topic/
11:34:41 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed merged PRs
11:34:49 <kaz> ek: (goes through the list)
11:34:59 <kaz> ... minor changes
11:35:03 <kaz> q?
11:35:48 <kaz> topic: New Calendar page
11:35:52 <kaz> ek: some feedback
11:36:15 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/495 PR 495 - feat: use open-web-calendar to view the W3C calendar
11:36:47 <kaz> -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/activities/meetings/ Web Conference Meetings page
11:37:09 <kaz> ek: not many things we can do for further improvement due to the library
11:37:23 <kaz> topic: WoT Adopters
11:37:42 <kaz> ek: would highlight WoT Adopters
11:37:55 <kaz> mm: would start with logistic questions first
11:38:12 <kaz> ek: Latest Status: Is the Marketing TF ok to have this as a CG topic? Marketing page can link to the CG page
11:38:28 <kaz> ... would hear opinions
11:38:28 <EgeKorkan> q?
11:38:46 <kaz> mm: maybe we can do brief catch-up
11:38:53 <kaz> present+ Erich_Barnstedt
11:39:11 <kaz> ... don't want to put non-Members on our WoT Marketing page
11:39:22 <kaz> ... but OK with having them on the WoT CG page
11:39:45 <kaz> ... the question is if it's OK for the WoT CG to maintain the Adopter page
11:39:51 <kaz> q+
11:40:00 <kaz> ek: right
11:40:16 <kaz> ... I'm thinking about something like the JSON Schema page
11:40:37 <EgeKorkan> q?
11:40:38 <kaz> -> https://landscape.json-schema.org JSON chema Landscape page
11:41:31 <McCool> q+
11:41:44 <kaz> ack k
11:41:57 <kaz> kaz: we should put together our expectations
11:42:09 <kaz> ... e.g., having WoT Adopters list
11:42:23 <kaz> ... possibly putting the page under www.w3.org/wot
11:42:33 <kaz> ... but maintained by the WoT CG
11:42:38 <kaz> mm: right
11:42:52 <kaz> ... also we should visually distinguish that page
11:43:18 <kaz> ... the URL could be www.w3.org/WoT/CG/Adopters
11:43:27 <kaz> ... then need to talk with the MarComm Team
11:43:36 <kaz> ack m
11:43:38 <kaz> ek: yeah
11:44:13 <kaz> ... btw, currently, the CG page under www.w3.org/WoT mentions both the WoT CG and the WoT JP CG
11:45:13 <kaz> mm: should have a bit different logo for the CG area
11:45:27 <kaz> ek: don't think it would be nicer for the whole WoT Marketing
11:45:39 <kaz> mm: we need to negotiate with the MarComm Team
11:46:48 <EgeKorkan> q?
11:47:02 <kaz> ek: another possibility is putting the Adopter information under github.io ara of the WoT CG
11:47:55 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-cg WoT CG repo
11:48:34 <kaz> mm: another question is if we want to distinguish non-W3C Members from W3C Members on the Adopter page
11:49:07 <kaz> ... maybe W3C Members should have more visibility
11:49:46 <EgeKorkan> q?
11:49:50 <kaz> ek: like the JSON Schema page standards, consortium, open source foundation, etc., could be different categories
11:50:21 <kaz> mm: should define specific procedure too
11:51:36 <kaz> q+
11:52:40 <kaz> ek: from the CG viewpoint, can pick up candidates when they give talks during the CG meetings
11:53:07 <kaz> kaz: technically, this is kind of like a registry :)
11:53:11 <kaz> mm: good point
11:53:54 <kaz> kaz: would suggest Ege's note on the Marketing wiki to be copied to a separated MD on GitHub
11:54:08 <kaz> ... and we continue discussion to add further clarification to that
11:54:11 <kaz> ek: exactly
11:54:37 <kaz> q-
11:54:38 <kaz> q+
11:55:41 <kaz> ack k
11:56:18 <kaz> kaz: we need to clarify the delicate points within the draft policy which require negotiation with the MarComm Team
11:56:34 <kaz> ... like who to maintain which part, URL, etc.
11:56:35 <kaz> mm: right
11:57:02 <kaz> kaz: like the UC submission, we should clarify our acceptance policy too
11:57:21 <kaz> ek: yeah
11:57:41 <kaz> ... for example, some of the WoT CG participants don't have GitHub accounts
11:58:11 <kaz> mm: need to leave...
11:58:43 <kaz> kaz: for today, would suggest we generate an initial draft policy/requirement based on today's discussion
11:58:57 <kaz> ... and continue the discussion via GitHub and following Marketing calls
11:59:00 <kaz> ek: ok
11:59:36 <kaz> ... regarding the domain name and ownership, can I ask the MarComm Team about those points now?
11:59:37 <kaz> mm: think so
11:59:41 <EgeKorkan> q?
12:00:23 <kaz> kaz: before sending the question to the MarComm Team, please send the draft to the group
12:00:27 <kaz> ek: will do
12:00:34 <kaz> [adjourned]
12:00:34 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
12:00:40 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:00:41 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
13:23:24 <JKRhb> JKRhb has joined #wot-marketing
14:03:20 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wot-marketing
14:04:38 <EgeKorkan> EgeKorkan has joined #wot-marketing
14:05:05 <EgeKorkan> EgeKorkan has joined #wot-marketing
14:42:16 <kaz> kaz has joined #wot-marketing