IRC log of wot-marketing on 2024-08-01

Timestamps are in UTC.

11:29:06 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #wot-marketing

11:29:11 [RRSAgent]

logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-wot-marketing-irc

11:29:12 [kaz]

meeting: WoT Marketing

11:29:28 [kaz]

present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Luca_Barbato

11:31:00 [McCool]

McCool has joined #wot-marketing

11:31:13 [kaz]

present+ Ege_Korkan

11:31:34 [kaz]

agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#August_1%2C_2024

11:31:47 [kaz]

regrets+ Daniel

11:31:51 [kaz]

topic: Minutes

11:32:01 [kaz]

-> https://www.w3.org/2024/05/02-wot-marketing-minutes.html May-2

11:33:52 [EgeKorkan]

q?

11:33:59 [kaz]

approved

11:34:25 [kaz]

toic: Merged PRs

11:34:31 [kaz]

s/toic/topic/

11:34:41 [kaz]

-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed merged PRs

11:34:49 [kaz]

ek: (goes through the list)

11:34:59 [kaz]

... minor changes

11:35:03 [kaz]

q?

11:35:48 [kaz]

topic: New Calendar page

11:35:52 [kaz]

ek: some feedback

11:36:15 [kaz]

-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/495 PR 495 - feat: use open-web-calendar to view the W3C calendar

11:36:47 [kaz]

-> https://www.w3.org/WoT/activities/meetings/ Web Conference Meetings page

11:37:09 [kaz]

ek: not many things we can do for further improvement due to the library

11:37:23 [kaz]

topic: WoT Adopters

11:37:42 [kaz]

ek: would highlight WoT Adopters

11:37:55 [kaz]

mm: would start with logistic questions first

11:38:12 [kaz]

ek: Latest Status: Is the Marketing TF ok to have this as a CG topic? Marketing page can link to the CG page

11:38:28 [kaz]

... would hear opinions

11:38:28 [EgeKorkan]

q?

11:38:46 [kaz]

mm: maybe we can do brief catch-up

11:38:53 [kaz]

present+ Erich_Barnstedt

11:39:11 [kaz]

... don't want to put non-Members on our WoT Marketing page

11:39:22 [kaz]

... but OK with having them on the WoT CG page

11:39:45 [kaz]

... the question is if it's OK for the WoT CG to maintain the Adopter page

11:39:51 [kaz]

q+

11:40:00 [kaz]

ek: right

11:40:16 [kaz]

... I'm thinking about something like the JSON Schema page

11:40:37 [EgeKorkan]

q?

11:40:38 [kaz]

-> https://landscape.json-schema.org JSON chema Landscape page

11:41:31 [McCool]

q+

11:41:44 [kaz]

ack k

11:41:57 [kaz]

kaz: we should put together our expectations

11:42:09 [kaz]

... e.g., having WoT Adopters list

11:42:23 [kaz]

... possibly putting the page under www.w3.org/wot

11:42:33 [kaz]

... but maintained by the WoT CG

11:42:38 [kaz]

mm: right

11:42:52 [kaz]

... also we should visually distinguish that page

11:43:18 [kaz]

... the URL could be www.w3.org/WoT/CG/Adopters

11:43:27 [kaz]

... then need to talk with the MarComm Team

11:43:36 [kaz]

ack m

11:43:38 [kaz]

ek: yeah

11:44:13 [kaz]

... btw, currently, the CG page under www.w3.org/WoT mentions both the WoT CG and the WoT JP CG

11:45:13 [kaz]

mm: should have a bit different logo for the CG area

11:45:27 [kaz]

ek: don't think it would be nicer for the whole WoT Marketing

11:45:39 [kaz]

mm: we need to negotiate with the MarComm Team

11:46:48 [EgeKorkan]

q?

11:47:02 [kaz]

ek: another possibility is putting the Adopter information under github.io ara of the WoT CG

11:47:55 [kaz]

-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-cg WoT CG repo

11:48:34 [kaz]

mm: another question is if we want to distinguish non-W3C Members from W3C Members on the Adopter page

11:49:07 [kaz]

... maybe W3C Members should have more visibility

11:49:46 [EgeKorkan]

q?

11:49:50 [kaz]

ek: like the JSON Schema page standards, consortium, open source foundation, etc., could be different categories

11:50:21 [kaz]

mm: should define specific procedure too

11:51:36 [kaz]

q+

11:52:40 [kaz]

ek: from the CG viewpoint, can pick up candidates when they give talks during the CG meetings

11:53:07 [kaz]

kaz: technically, this is kind of like a registry :)

11:53:11 [kaz]

mm: good point

11:53:54 [kaz]

kaz: would suggest Ege's note on the Marketing wiki to be copied to a separated MD on GitHub

11:54:08 [kaz]

... and we continue discussion to add further clarification to that

11:54:11 [kaz]

ek: exactly

11:54:37 [kaz]

q-

11:54:38 [kaz]

q+

11:55:41 [kaz]

ack k

11:56:18 [kaz]

kaz: we need to clarify the delicate points within the draft policy which require negotiation with the MarComm Team

11:56:34 [kaz]

... like who to maintain which part, URL, etc.

11:56:35 [kaz]

mm: right

11:57:02 [kaz]

kaz: like the UC submission, we should clarify our acceptance policy too

11:57:21 [kaz]

ek: yeah

11:57:41 [kaz]

... for example, some of the WoT CG participants don't have GitHub accounts

11:58:11 [kaz]

mm: need to leave...

11:58:43 [kaz]

kaz: for today, would suggest we generate an initial draft policy/requirement based on today's discussion

11:58:57 [kaz]

... and continue the discussion via GitHub and following Marketing calls

11:59:00 [kaz]

ek: ok

11:59:36 [kaz]

... regarding the domain name and ownership, can I ask the MarComm Team about those points now?

11:59:37 [kaz]

mm: think so

11:59:41 [EgeKorkan]

q?

12:00:23 [kaz]

kaz: before sending the question to the MarComm Team, please send the draft to the group

12:00:27 [kaz]

ek: will do

12:00:34 [kaz]

[adjourned]

12:00:34 [kaz]

rrsagent, make log public

12:00:40 [kaz]

rrsagent, draft minutes

12:00:41 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz

13:23:24 [JKRhb]

JKRhb has joined #wot-marketing

14:03:20 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #wot-marketing

14:04:38 [EgeKorkan]

EgeKorkan has joined #wot-marketing

14:05:05 [EgeKorkan]

EgeKorkan has joined #wot-marketing

14:42:16 [kaz]

kaz has joined #wot-marketing