16:00:47 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 16:00:51 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-rdf-star-irc 16:00:51 Zakim has joined #rdf-star 16:01:01 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/348e384e-2c0d-4c88-bb5c-5ddddf93ef4d/20240801T120000/ 16:01:01 clear agenda 16:01:01 agenda+ Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2024/07/18-rdf-star-minutes.html , -> 2 https://www.w3.org/2024/07/25-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:01:01 agenda+ TPAC 24 -> 3 https://www.w3.org/2024/09/TPAC/ 16:01:02 agenda+ Charter Extension -> 4 https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star-wg-charter/ 16:01:03 agenda+ Proposal for next week's discussion 16:01:06 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at -> 5 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 16:01:08 agenda+ Issue Triage, available at -> 6 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/5 16:01:11 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 16:01:13 present+ 16:01:19 meeting: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting 16:01:23 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:01:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:01:28 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:01:30 present+ 16:01:45 present+ 16:01:48 Chair: Ora 16:01:58 scribe: ktk 16:02:03 pfps has joined #rdf-star 16:02:03 present+ 16:02:11 present+ 16:02:17 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/07/26-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:02:17 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/08/02-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:02:33 regrets+ niklas, doerthe, Dominik_T, AZ, enrico 16:02:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:02:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:03:01 Zakim, open item 1 16:03:01 agendum 1 -- Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2024/07/18-rdf-star-minutes.html , -> 2 https://www.w3.org/2024/07/25-rdf-star-minutes.html -- 16:03:01 ... taken up [from agendabot] 16:03:01 present+ 16:03:04 Souri has joined #rdf-star 16:03:07 present+ 16:03:48 present+ 16:04:00 regrets+ olaf 16:04:22 PROPOSAL: Approve minutes from 2024-07-18 and 2024-07-25 16:04:26 +1 16:04:27 +1 16:04:27 +1 16:04:28 +1 16:04:29 +1 16:04:30 +1 16:04:34 +1 16:04:36 +0, could be better 16:04:37 +1 16:05:26 RESOLVED: Approve minutes from 2024-07-18 and 2024-07-25 16:05:31 Zakim, next item 16:05:31 agendum 2 -- TPAC 24 -> 3 https://www.w3.org/2024/09/TPAC/ -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:06:17 Ora: We are registered at TPAC. 16:06:54 I will listen in, but not be there. 16:07:02 ... quick strawpoll, who is planing to attend either remotely or in person 16:07:03 I'll be there 16:07:14 Will attend - likely remote 16:07:31 Will attend remotely 16:07:40 I will likely attend. 16:08:14 I'll be remote only ... probably in our meetings, depends on what sessions conflict 16:08:16 I will attend, likely remote 16:08:20 I will attend in person. 16:09:11 gkellogg: we should doublecheck our slots, there was an overlap with JSON-LD WG 16:10:16 Ora: We have a joint meeting on Tuesday 24 but it looks like the JSON-LD group meeting overlaps with our RDF Star WG on Thursday 26 16:11:56 Ora: We have Tuesday morning and Thursday morning for our meeting 16:12:03 Ora: And a joint meeting with JSON-LD 16:12:17 gkellogg: there are 4 of us that are in both groups 16:12:39 gkellogg: but we could probably leave out the JSON-LD meeting that overlaps with RDF Star on Thursday 16:13:07 Ora: What are we going to do with this meeting? There are likely people joining that are not part of our group. We might want to do explanation and outreach. 16:13:29 ... I would like to get clarity on the whole JSON datatype still. 16:13:45 q+ 16:14:04 gkellogg: We have to address the concerns from pfps which we have to address. 16:14:45 pfps: IIRC canonicalization is not part of our concern anymore. 16:15:08 ... there are other concerns still. 16:15:21 Ora: I hope that we can either fix it or explicitly say it's not our concern. 16:16:11 gkellogg: We can talk about this at TPAC but I think we are in sight of getting done what we are here for and that should be the focus. 16:16:22 ack pfps 16:16:50 eBremer has joined #rdf-star 16:17:06 i will attend on thursday, but not on tuesday 16:17:48 Zakim, next item 16:17:48 agendum 3 -- Charter Extension -> 4 https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star-wg-charter/ -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:18:01 present+ 16:18:58 present+ 16:19:11 Ora: Where are we with the extension 16:19:21 ktk: The pull request was merged but I'm not sure if it is formally done 16:19:44 draggett: I will try to find out what the status is 16:20:26 gkellogg: I think it needs membership action to get through 16:20:40 ora: I would not have seen an email that would urge the membership to vote 16:21:08 ... whatever you could find out draggett would be great 16:21:34 Zakim, next item 16:21:34 agendum 4 -- Proposal for next week's discussion -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:22:32 q+ 16:22:42 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/Extending-the-baseline-with-%22asserted%22-stuff 16:22:53 ack AndyS 16:22:55 Ora: Enrico proposed some things 16:23:11 AndyS: the other thing we have to get to the bottom to is LPGs 16:23:22 q+ 16:23:22 ... I don't think we went through that yet and it will reoccur 16:23:37 ack thomas 16:24:09 thomas: LPG and "unasserted stuff" overlaps 16:24:40 ktk: Topics from enrico: a final vote on singleton properties, and on opaque IRIs 16:25:01 AndyS: for LPG, I don't think we properly articularted what problems we try to sovle 16:25:04 s/sovle/solve/ 16:25:25 ... I'm not sure myself what is and isn't the scope 16:25:36 ora: do you have time gtw to articulate some of that 16:26:01 gtw: our goal from Amazon is increasing interop between LPG and RDF Star 16:26:11 q+ 16:26:16 ack thomas 16:26:17 ... but as Andy said it's not clear where the limit is. Some things might be too far. But I would like to see an increase 16:26:36 well, the intertop is currently at 100% if you define interop the right way 16:26:51 q+ 16:26:58 q+ 16:27:55 thomas: I would differentiate between annotations of the statement as its entity and annoations on individual notes, especially the property 16:28:12 ack draggett 16:28:32 draggett: I really hope that RDF 1.2 will facilitate semantic interoperability, including LPG 16:28:46 ack Souri 16:28:49 ... as a business objective 16:28:56 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2024Jul/0155.html 16:29:44 Souri: as I indicated in one of my messages is what exactly are we trying to achieve. We can model LPGs in RDF 1.2 but RDF 1.2 is more powerful so we cannot necessarily model that completely in LGP 16:29:53 q+ 16:30:03 ora: I'm happy to see that RDF is more expressive 16:30:17 s/I would differentiate between annotations of the statement as its entity and annoations on individual notes, especially the property/I would differentiate between annotations of the statement as an entity on its own right and annotations on individual nodes, especially the property 16:30:34 ack fsasaki 16:30:37 Souri: we should add the state of the art from the LPG. Make sure that whatever is doable in LGP can be expressed in RDF 16:31:28 fsasaki: What do you mean with xxx property. Do you mean edges in LGP terminology? 16:31:31 thomas: yes 16:31:57 s/xxx/annotations on/ 16:32:43 Ora: candidates for discussion: Resolution on opacity, rule out singleton properties, discuss on where we are going to go with LPG-RDF interop 16:32:51 sounds good 16:32:55 +1 16:32:56 +1 16:33:03 +1 16:33:04 +1 16:33:09 +1 16:33:13 +1 16:33:13 +1 16:33:22 Zakim, next item 16:33:22 agendum 5 -- Review of pull requests, available at -> 5 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:33:33 q+ 16:34:01 ack gkellogg 16:34:37 q+ 16:35:20 q+ 16:36:26 ack pfps 16:36:41 gkellogg: I have 3 open PRs that are IMO ready to merge 16:36:49 ack AndyS 16:36:50 pfps: works for me, we can adjust mine after the merge 16:37:05 AndyS: I'm in support of merging the Turtle one (51) 16:37:14 ... it makes new starting points better 16:37:48 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:37:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk 16:38:13 q+ 16:38:54 ack gkellogg 16:39:09 q+ 16:39:17 gkellogg: There is some more work in RDF Turtle but this work should be test case driven. 16:39:50 ack thomas 16:40:14 I've put these into a SPARQL grammar + test cases. 16:40:14 thomas: on naming, how do we call the reified term, is there a conclusion? 16:40:29 ... gkellogg did you come to some sort of arrangement? 16:40:55 gkellogg: a reifier is an identifier, that is used for the triple macro. that's what's called a reified triple term. 16:41:29 Zakim, next item 16:41:29 agendum 6 -- Issue Triage, available at -> 6 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/5 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:42:23 AndyS: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/116 is basically overtaken by Turtle issue 51 we discused 16:42:24 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/116 -> Issue 116 Determine naming syntax for reifiers (by niklasl) [needs discussion] 16:42:32 ... better to close it then 16:43:23 ora: anything else? 16:44:41 gkellogg: number 114, how does it affect RDF Canonicalization. That's the "unstar" mapping that we have not discussed yet 16:45:06 q+ 16:45:15 ... it might be mapped to classical RDF reification 16:45:27 ... The question is is this working or not. It will not roundtrip 16:45:56 ack thomas 16:46:19 thomas: I would like to have the discussion on how the unstar is mapped. Reification is one way but there are other options. I could add to that issue. 16:46:28 ora: please do then 16:47:08 ... any low hanging fruits that need discussion? 16:47:31 will add to issue 114 16:47:57 AndyS: Canonical mapping to datatypes, I thought we resolved not to have that. 16:48:13 gkellogg: right 16:49:08 gkellogg: RDF/XML and RDFa at one time had a dependency on that and since moved on. 16:49:50 AndyS: we can resolve that. 16:49:57 gkellogg: I will make a note about that 16:50:45 Zakim, next item 16:50:45 agendum 7 -- Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:50:59 q+ 16:51:05 ack TallTed 16:51:21 unasserted assertions 16:51:24 q+ to ask whether we have enough people next week. 16:51:48 @tallted unasserted assertions 16:51:51 ack AndyS 16:51:51 AndyS, you wanted to ask whether we have enough people next week. 16:54:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:54:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk 16:57:03 s/will reoccur/will recur/ 16:57:50 s/intertop/interop/ 16:59:49 s/planning/planing/ 17:00:18 s/LGP/LPG/ 17:00:36 s/JSON data type/JSON datatype/ 17:00:47 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:00:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk 17:01:40 present+ thomas 17:01:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:01:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/08/01-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk 17:02:08 RRSAgent, leave 17:02:08 I see no action items