Meeting minutes
<janina> gb, off
<gb> janina, issues and names were already off.
Agenda Review & Announcements
janina: one announcement - there is a call for consensus with a quick turn around
matatk: don't need we need to get into as a subtopic - but thanks from myself and janina for all your work and raised concerns
matatk: we have three separate issues, please vote in call for consensus
matatk: thanks again to all that contributed to the review
Fazio: apologies for having no time to review, but saw the general comments and changes
janina: comments made make sense even if you haven't read the document
janina: fair to say you don't need to read through the document to judge if comments are fair and sound
Dr_Keith: i feel comfortable with the comments made
janina: we would like to contextualise comments, call for testing, calls for clarity
NehaJ: comments cover everything, you don't need to go through the document
janina: agreed, you can look through proposed comments without having to read full document
Gottfried: looked briefly through the document, in europe we have the same (chapter 11), WCAG transposed to software
Gottfried: for some of the criteria it may be hard to apply to software
Gottfried: wondering what we will do with the EN when have WCAG for ICT
Gottfried: in favour of it, but looking forward to discussion in the EU
janina: want to give people some comfort that diving into the document is not critical at this points, we are only identifying gaps that are in scope
janina: because of the deadline, there is a deadline by the 6th, there is an expiration date for voting
janina: any further questions
matatk: a couple of things - some acknowledgment as to the inveracities to mapping wcag success criteria to non web context + encourage people to comment on areas that are not covered
TPAC 2024 Planning
janina_: tpac is ever closer, calendar is getting full and the group's wiki page is yet to be put together
janina: meetings scheduled already in the calendar, rooms are available. time and date still to be set
janina: who else planning to attend in person? (and how many are we expecting virtually)
<Zakim> matatk, you wanted to mention calendar idea + ask who's attending IRL
matatk: idea for scheduling is to use the w3c tool and building our agendas using that tool
matatk: who is coming to TPAC in person?
<matatk> +1
<Fazio> +1
<janina_> +0
<Gottfried> -1
<Roy> +1
<Dr_Keith> +0
<Dr_Keith> not attending
janina: EPUB session will be scheduled at early hours
Fazio: for info we will be working on maturity models in TPC
janina: participating remotely is meaningful (though mindful of time differences)
Task Force & Deliverables Updates
janina: nothing specific on this right now, any updates from anyone?
New Charters Review
HR A11y Review Comment Tracker
Roy: we can jump to item 7, there is no new comments on the charter this week
Explicit Review Requests
New on TR
Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Rules Format 1.1
<Roy> - tracker: https://
<Roy> - spec: https://
Roy: there are two new publications this week, links in irc
Dr_Keith: how does reviewing the document and getting involved work
janina: joining the working group is a good way to get involved
Fazio: you can joint as many groups as you want
janina_: correction that companies can join any group, invited experts are invited to specific ones
janina_: value at this point is to get a sense how they reach consensus on conformance testing
<Zakim> matatk, you wanted to talk about deadline
matatk: comments on the wording and clarity of the ACT working draft
matatk: note that they asked for comments by the 18th of august for this early draft
NehaJ: i would like to be part of this group
Fazio: will add Neha to the group
Fredrik: anyone know if there is a plan to make the things they wrote about in the introduction?
janina_: the titiling hasn't changed from the last round and they are not planning to drastically change things
Roy: a clarification that the 18th of august is not a deadline for us, we can review the document when they request a transition, like CR
CSS Scroll Snap Module Level 2
<Roy> - tracker: https://
<Roy> - spec: https://
CSS Update (Paul)
<PaulG> w3c/
PaulG: one thing to being up - there is an issue for when you get to the end of an input with the cursor caret, it's not very well described what should happen in that event
PaulG: after discussion, fallback is accessible and designers can add padding. that's a win
Actions check-in
janina_: any updates on actions from anyone
matatk: update on a long running action: working behind the scenes on improving the processes we use and taking advantage of the W3C architecture on github
matatk: more updates about streamlining our processes will be shared in due time
<matatk> issues/
matatk: process changes already happening: moved to the w3c calendar, also good at sending meeting reminders/details prior