Meeting minutes
Agenda Review
Action Items
<addison> https://
<addison> #112
<gb> Action 112 investigate changes to jlreq due to publication of jpan-lreq (on himorin) due 2024-07-25
<addison> atsushi: there's a question if there's a fundamental, there should be some answer
<addison> ... wonder if i should work on there
<addison> ... it's a philosophy issue
<r12a> w3c/
<gb> Issue 438 Japanese Script Resources page (by r12a)
<addison> richard: responded to some questions from kida-san, responded ^
addison: how about jlreq to -lreq document
r12a: asked Kida-san about mapping bwtween jlreq documents and new -lreq documents
<addison> atsushi: there is some question about the scope between the two documents
<addison> ... want to maybe mirror structure of arabic or latin requirements
<addison> richard: they can do what they want; organization of original doc could maybe be improved
<addison> ... not need to adopt the 89 heads in lreq
<addison> addison: perhaps do a cross-over call; suspect just a misunderstanding
<addison> atsushi: seems like there ... there might be some ??? eastern languages support; could be the cause for ???
<addison> richard: made a long comment
<addison> atsushi: don't think comment will solve
<addison> richard: don't really "care"; they can do it their own way, do whatever they want; they _can_ use the structure but not required
<addison> ... treat langauges, not just scripts, and it works fine for all sorts of languages
<addison> ... up to kida-san whatever he wants to do, can link to sections in the document
<addison> ... it's one reason I split out jlreq docs from the other ones so we have
<addison> ... let's see what kida-san says; if further misunderstanding can follow up
<addison> #106
<gb> Action 106 write to ietf group about rfc9457 (on aphillips) due 2024-06-20
<addison> #90
<gb> Action 90 steal some of henri's text from scroll-to-text-fragment for string-search (on aphillips) due 2024-04-18
addison: not finishwd #108
<addison> #89
<gb> Action 89 update i18n specs to support dark mode (on xfq) due 2024-04-18
<addison> #79
<gb> Action 79 schedule a follow-up call with WHATNOT (on aphillips) due 2024-03-07
addison: 4pm today for WHATWG call
<addison> close #79
<gb> Closed issue #79
<addison> #33
<gb> Action 33 Close issues marked `close?` or bring to WG for further review (on aphillips)
<addison> #8
<gb> Action 8 Follow up on the status of Canvas and formatted text (on aphillips) due 18 Jul 2023
<addison> #7
<gb> Action 7 Remind shepherds to tend to their awaiting comment resolutions (Evergreen) (on aphillips, xfq, himorin, r12a, bert-github) due 18 Jul 2023
<addison> #4
<gb> Action 4 Work with respec and bikeshed to provide the character markup template as easy-to-use markup (on aphillips, r12a) due 27 Jul 2023
Info Share
<r12a> https://
r12a: now have lots of documents retires
RADAR Review
<addison> https://
addison: two incoming requests
bert: looking into
… will take ACT Rules Format 1.1
atsushi: will do for IFT
Pending Issue Review
<addison> https://
addison: incoming checklist for IFT, will be checked by atsushi
… xfq has pending one also[
This week's publications
<addison> https://
<r12a> grek-lreq https://
<r12a> gujr-lreq https://
<r12a> taml-lreq https://
<r12a> java-lreq https://
r12a: published seveal
<r12a> https://
<r12a> https://
<r12a> https://
r12a: mostly the same documents with some different links
<addison> PROPOSED: shall the nine new script-based lreq documents be approved for FPWD
<r12a> +1
<addison> +1
<Bert> +1
<atsushi_> +1
RESOLUTION: publish nine new script-based lreq documents mentioned in the minutes for FPWD
Prepare for WHATNOT call
<addison> whatwg/
<gb> Issue 10496 Upcoming WHATNOT meeting on 2024-07-25 (by past) [agenda+]
addison: upcoming whatnot call, pushed as above issue
<addison> whatwg/
<gb> Pull Request 5799 Fix #4562: add support for internationalized email addresses (by aphillips) [addition/proposal] [needs implementer interest] [topic: forms] [i18n-tracker] [agenda+]
addison: cleaned up that PR
addison: another topic on i18n-glossary and topics
… several weesk ago, we discussed on this
… our documents are non normative document, but most of referrering document does not need to do
… just to use definitions
… conflict with INFRA are code points related terminology
… and kinds of UTF-16 kinds of words
… code unit values and schema related
… they are not correctly , but they focues on usage within UTF016
<addison> https://
RESOLVED
addison: open issue on directions as above issues
addison: another slot is right after this, so potential next slot should be next month