Meeting minutes
Guests
<McCool0> https://
McCool: do you agree with W3C patent policy?
Charith: yes
McCool: Charith will give a presentation. We will see how he can contribute to our specs
Minutes
<kaz> July-10
<MM shows the minutes from last week>
McCool: there seems a strange date for the Profil call. Luca can you confirm?
Quick Items
McCool: any news about Web-based Digital Twins for Smart Cities IG ?
Kaz: still waiting for response
Meetups
McCool: any news?
<no responses>
McCool: WoT JP CG plans a Use Case event for July 26
Guest Presentation
<CP shows slides>
Charith: I'm from Sri Lanka. Did my PhD in Australia
… now I'm in the UK and a Reader (Associate Professor) at the Cardiff University
… have experiences in smart home engineering and did building research
… my academic focuses on, e.g., on privacy fluid
… help people to adopt privacy principles
… I'm leading an interdisciplinary team for forest observatory.
… for the topic resilientsensing we uses the knowledge of sensors and network traffic and how they could put together
… I have also had a project in the Smart City domain. There we used also semantic web technologies.
… in Cardiff we have a IoT lab
McCool: you have also security experiences, right?
Charith: yes
McCool: which spec would you be interest in WoT?
Charith: Security would be relevant. Architecture would be also relevant
Sebastian: What is your motivation for beeing here and to contribute to WoT?
Kaz: we need to clarify the details offline
Luca: are you also interested in implementation work?
Charith: Maybe. I need to understand this more first.
McCool: we have, eg., Plugfests. It's not manditory to contribute but would be welcome
Charith: thank you
Collaboration
<kaz> WebTransport WG Proposed Charter
<kaz> WebTransport spec
McCool: there is a new charter
… question is if we should also show up there as group?
… suggestion should come from a memebr and not from the group
Kaz: there is no special rule or policy for this
… we should ask Luca's expectation
Luca: the charter may get bit stronger when we sharing our interest in this technology
McCool: ok, it's technical related since they also using WebSockets
<luca_barbato> w3c/
McCool: would also suggest to add WoT to the collaboration
<kaz> call for review for WebTransport WG Charter (Member-only)
<McCool0> proposal: Request Web-Transport WG to add a collaboration with Web of Things WG to their WG charter.
McCool: any objection?
Kaz: we should confirm everybody's opinion.
… I myself am totally fine with this possible collaboration, because I've been suggesting we should work on stronger support for browser integration, though.
McCool: I think it is worth to talk about
Sebastian: I do not have strong opinion.
McCool: document is still under review
<McCool0> proposal: Request Web-Transport WG to add a collaboration with Web of Things WG to their WG charter.
McCool: I would support due to visibility
Kaz: given it's already on the official AC review, we need to clarify the action also (i.e., somebody from us as an AC rep gives a comment about that)
<dezell2> I support the need for visibility. I will comment as an AC rep.
<McCool0> proposal: Request (via WoT WG member who is an AC rep) Web-Transport WG to add a collaboration with Web of Things WG to their WG charter.
McCool: we can do a resolution. Someone else (AC rep) take the action.
Luca: I will do it
<McCool0> proposal: Request (via WoT WG member who is an AC rep - Luca Barbato has volunteered) Web-Transport WG to add a collaboration with Web of Things WG to their WG charter.
McCool: any objections?
no
RESOLUTION: Request (via WoT WG member who is an AC rep - Luca Barbato has volunteered) Web-Transport WG to add a collaboration with Web of Things WG to their WG charter.
Luca: I will update my review on the Charter
Sebastian: I will also mention WoT in my review
… any issue with it?
McCool: no
Liaisons
McCool: established a liaison with ETSI ISG CIM (NGSI-LD)
… there meetings every 2 weeks
Sebastian: there is a kick-off meeting of the new OPC Foundation WG "UA Binding for Web of Things" in 2 weeks (30 July)
McCool: only OPCF Members can join
Kaz: we ourselves (WoT WG) need to clarify our expectation for OPC Binding and Binding Template registry for that purpose
Kaz: need to clarify the exchange. Still working on the liaisons contact page
Schedule
Daniel: tomorrow there will be no TD and Marketing call
Kaz: today there is a TD call about TD tooling, while no TD call tomorrow
Luca: I send an email about yesterdays Profile outcomes
F2F Planning
TPAC
<McCool shows status of breakouts topics>
Kaz: we should clarify how to organize the Profile call, one whole hour or half an hour, weekly or bi-weekly.
WoT Week in November
<kaz> WoT Week wiki
McCool: there is a dicussion about the WoT supporters for the web page
Plugfest call
Sebastian: next week there will restart the Plugfest meeting to organize the Plugfest for the WoT week
McCool: there is a conflict with the Profile call.
… need to cancel it next week
<kaz> (asks for clarification on when to have the Plugfest call, e.g., only next week or bi-weekly)
McCool: Plugfest meeting next week is a non-recurring meeting
<kaz> [adjourned]