Meeting minutes
IRI stems
gaurav: THO is going to upgrade to R5. They want a final QA check, but not where to look. I'll message Marc Duteau.
https://
gaurav: The other issue has gone to consensus review.
https://
gaurav: Consensus review means we need to solicit votes.
… I'll reach out to Rob Hausam
DICOM
erich: Could extend jena to support DICOM types.
detlef: Problematic: There are a few instances in which the byte order is determined by the VR, and would not be round trippable back from XSD to DICOM without knowing the original VR.
erich: What about canonicalizing the endianness in converting to RDF?
dbooth: I like that idea
erich: That would enable XSD types throughout
… Then the VR type wouldn't be needed in the data. But still keep it in the ontology.
detlef: What about private data elements?
… No ontology for them
dbooth: how about keeping the VR type when private data elements?
detlef: They have a complicated encoding.
dbooth: Agree with Option 10?
AGREED: Choosing option 10 for official DICOM tags
AGREED: And standardize endianness during conversion to RDF
ACTION: Erich to create issue for private data elements
erich: What about the <> ? We should say something about what that IRI should be.
… I use the file URI for it.
ACTION: Erich to create an issue for what IRI to use instead of <> in option 10.
ADJOURNED