Meeting minutes
Introduction, Any Updates?
Lionel_Wolberger: Reviews NFB participation; Very interested in what we're doing, esp WKD
Scheduling, Summer is here
Lionel_Wolberger: Regrets next week from Matthew
Lionel_Wolberger: Will be on holliday on the 23rd
janina: Suggest let's return to this at meetings end
TPAC Planning
<matatk> https://
<matatk> Note: the APA Monday morning meeting is likely to move to a different day to be combined with a different meeting.
janina: The TPAC is California time, but we can bring people in via remote
Russell: I may be interested in attending.
janina: You are an invited expert, there is no charge
janina: Glad to hear you will participate! The fact that corporations are interested in WKD is persuasive
Recruitment
janina: Suggest we recruit at TPAC and in the fall, as we want to recruit when we have a very regular schedule and clear documents to be read
Russell: I spoke with someone who is interested.
Handout for TPAC
Lionel_Wolberger: Lionel to bring more of the symbols one-pager
… consider a one-pager that can express the use case for WKDs
Symbols explainer
Generalizing Symbols
<Zakim> matatk, you wanted to ask about patches, and the EPUB approah
Lionel_Wolberger: We agreed last week to stick to our scope of AAC-type symbols, as they are used in procedures or topic lists
… and perhaps once passed, the idea of translatable/transformable symbols might spread
janina: and people could register themselves
Prioritization
matatk: Would we want to consider prioritization? For example, if a person wants an AAC symbol and an emoji, they could express which has priority
… some sets of symbols are more comprehensive than others
… there is a tricky balance between (a) communication remains dynamic and ever evolving (b) communication relies on shared, hence static understandings
janina: Proposing priotizing our next step: update the documents prior to TPAC
… (a) make a list of the docs 1. AAC spec 2.Registry spec 3.Explainer 4.Home page
… (b) commit to updating them prior TPAC, and log this in the Issue 240
janina: (1) AAC spec is in CR since Vancouver '22
… (2) Registry is in FPWD since 2022 and needs updating in light of Issue 240 discussion
… (3) Explainer need updating in light of Issue 240 discussion.
Lionel_Wolberger: Explainer may benefit from an 'out of scope' section.
janina: I agree to work with Russel on the documents
… we will skip 16th and 23rd July due to regrets, vacations. Next meeting 30 July
WKD Github actions and PRs
Lionel_Wolberger: Take up the issue of multiple services on a single URL
matatk: Security considerations may differ depending which part of the URL tree you are focusing on
… we should review the linksets, Phil Archer suggests we look at RFC 9264, Linksets https://
<matatk> https://
<matatk> oops
<matatk> https://
Lionel_Wolberger: Abhinav agrees to look at the GS1 linksets and bring to our next meeting a gap analysis or comparison
janina: It's a kind of due dilligence