16:00:50 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors
16:00:54 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/07/08-aria-editors-irc
16:00:54 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
16:00:55 <Zakim> Meeting: ARIA Editors
16:01:28 <dmontalvo> agendabot, find agenda
16:01:28 <agendabot> dmontalvo, OK. This may take a minute...
16:01:30 <agendabot> agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-editors/2024Jul/0000.html
16:01:30 <agendabot> clear agenda
16:01:30 <agendabot> agenda+ [continue] monorepo
16:01:30 <agendabot> agenda+ [continue] Remove abbr elements aria PR #2136
16:01:31 <agendabot> agenda+ [continue] aria-common #109 remove/replace aria-wg-active.md and
16:01:34 <agendabot> agenda+ [continue] respec dark mode (aria #2133 etc)
16:01:37 <agendabot> agenda+ [continue] modernizing aria.js (aria-common #104 & PR #106)
16:01:39 <agendabot> agenda+ [on Hold] spec markup for advice for AT (jnurthen)
16:04:33 <pkra> scribe: pkra
16:04:57 <jamesn> jamesn has joined #aria-editors
16:05:31 <pkra> present+
16:05:40 <jamesn> present+
16:05:42 <pkra> zakim, next item
16:05:42 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- [continue] monorepo -- taken up [from agendabot]
16:06:29 <melsumner> melsumner has joined #aria-editors
16:06:44 <pkra> pkra: just trying to see where we are. Lots of issues still related to it.
16:06:56 <pkra> jamesn: does everyone have issues that they need help with?
16:07:37 <pkra> scotto: talking to spectranaut. popover PR merged in fine but got errors from github -- I just ignored them since couldn't figure out what the errors said.
16:08:29 <pkra> ... I noticed that after merging the PR, github usually ran a process that forced me to rebase other branches. That didn't seem to happen for aria.
16:08:47 <pkra> ... I had to do this manually, check for rebase/merge issues.
16:09:06 <pkra> jamesn: maybe due to your spec running on gh-pages branch.
16:09:19 <pkra> ... that has some magic associated with it.
16:09:59 <pkra> scotto: the existing PRs did not automatically update to show conflicts.
16:10:05 <pkra> ... e.g., changelog changes.
16:10:14 <pkra> jamesn: that's very odd.
16:10:51 <pkra> scotto: I don't want to risk a conflict. In any case,  it's a difference to html-aam before.
16:11:37 <pkra> jamesn: on the aria spec would say it's a merge conflict.
16:11:44 <pkra> scotto: it wasn't for my situation
16:12:01 <pkra> pkra: I don't understand the situation. What did you need to run to get a merge conflit?
16:12:40 <pkra> scotto: e.g., https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/pull/538
16:13:01 <pkra> ... this always showed up, doesn't seem to show up on the monorepo.
16:13:12 <pkra> jamesn: we see that all the time
16:13:36 <pkra> scotto: I merged popover PR. Then went to another PR
16:14:32 <pkra> ... then went to minimum role PR (2220 after 2219)
16:18:02 <pkra> ... didn't show merge conflict. after changelog update it did. I'd rather it would automatically do that.
16:18:30 <pkra> pkra: maybe the actions (e.g., prettier) would trigger a conflict - but they really shouldn't
16:18:40 <pkra> scotto: will try to ping you all next time I see this.
16:19:01 <pkra> melsumner: will issues get moved as well?
16:19:07 <pkra> scotto: just PRs for now.
16:19:35 <pkra> pkra: that was the plan, we can always revisit.
16:20:46 <pkra> melsumner: was the problem with creating fresh branches off main?
16:20:50 <pkra> scotto: no, existing PRs.
16:21:18 <pkra> melsumner: ok. people will have to get used to updating main whenever branching.
16:22:29 <pkra> scotto: could be related.
16:22:47 <pkra> ... on a related note, had a first meeting with Rahim.
16:23:37 <pkra> ... he didn't get the invites to this meeting.
16:24:55 <pkra> pkra: is the pr-preview feature ready?
16:25:11 <pkra> daniel-montalvo: pr-previews should work but there are other aspects that still need work.
16:25:53 <pkra> pkra: new changelog issue
16:26:19 <pkra> jamesn: I'll take that on. I'll need to help respec to allow filtering for each spec.
16:27:01 <pkra> ... we need to do it manually until then. like scotto does.
16:27:10 <pkra> scotto: it's so tedious, I wonder if it's still necessary.
16:27:22 <pkra> jamesn: I agree.
16:27:58 <pkra> ... it's high on my priority list.
16:28:15 <pkra> pkra: about https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2228
16:28:55 <pkra> ... I thought editors would but not sure how we left things.
16:30:30 <pkra> jamesn: I think spectranaut just didn't want to merge them.
16:32:35 <pkra> melsumner: I'll go through accname.
16:33:05 <pkra> pkra: ah, I understand spectranaut now. I'll merge those.
16:33:14 <pkra> zakim, next item
16:33:14 <Zakim> agendum 2 -- [continue] Remove abbr elements aria PR #2136 -- taken up [from agendabot]
16:35:01 <pkra> jamesn: thanks for the reminder.
16:35:20 <pkra> zakim, end meeting
16:35:21 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been pkra, jamesn
16:35:21 <Zakim> RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2
16:35:23 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/07/08-aria-editors-minutes.html Zakim
16:35:30 <Zakim> I am happy to have been of service, pkra; please remember to excuse RRSAgent.  Goodbye
16:35:30 <Zakim> Zakim has left #aria-editors
16:51:34 <melsumner> If folks are still here: is the plan for how the editor's drafts will work, written down somewhere I can read?