Meeting minutes
<gb> /issues/156 -> #156
<gb> /issues/81 -> #81
<gb> /issues/130 -> #130
agenda
new business
<gb> /issues/81 -> #81
<gb> /issues/156 -> #156
<gb> /issues/130 -> #130
Fazio: Equity and sustainability separate model of use existing and increase scope of maturity??
janina: MM scope is a11y
janina: This is may be W3C problem to be looked at and not MM or APA
Fazio: Added comment stating separate dimension can be added
Fazio: A meeting can be set up during TPAC
jkline: I agree with Fazio that it is out of scope
jkline: we have a good lead on MM now, it is being checked by people
janina: we need a TPAC discussion for Equity and sustainability
Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update
jkline: no furthur points to be discussed
jkline: right now it is workable
Fazio: can we get feedback from people at TPAC
jkline: can we inform public that it is public?
janina: yes we can push for review or try out
CharlesL1: not sure if everyone has gone through the excel sheet, first review pointed out lot of issues, please check a11y of it and try it
Github Issue #81 Section 3.4.1 Proof Points for ICT Development Lifecycle: Missing planning aspects
<gb> /issues/81 -> #81
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 81 Section 3.4.1 Proof Points for ICT Development Lifecycle: Missing planning aspects (by maryjom)
<Fazio> https://
jkline: We can add new section with requirements and planning
Fazio: should all steps be sequential?
jkline: for development it make sense for sequence
CharlesL1: everything we add in the document should also reflected in the spreadsheet
Github #156 Issue Section 3.5: proof points should consider whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as a result of the efforts made.
<gb> /issues/156 -> #156
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 156 Section 3.5: proof points should consider whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as a result of the efforts made. (by jasonjgw)
Fazio: No meeting next week
jkline: refering recruiting section
jkline: 3.5.1.1 Targeted Recruiting
jkline: commenting on the issue
janina: check for the usage of satisfying
Issue updated with comments