14:50:48 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #maturity
14:50:52 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/07/03-maturity-irc
14:50:52 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
14:50:53 <Zakim> please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio
14:51:09 <Fazio> meeting: Maturity Model
14:51:16 <Fazio> chair: Fazio
14:52:30 <Fazio> Agenda+ New Business
14:52:30 <Fazio> Agenda+ Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update
14:52:30 <Fazio> Agenda+ Github Issue #81 Section 3.4.1 Proof Points for ICT Development Lifecycle: Missing planning aspects
14:52:30 <Fazio> Agenda+ Github #156 Issue Section 3.5: proof points should consider whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as a result of the efforts made.
14:52:30 <gb> /issues/156 -> #156
14:52:30 <gb> /issues/81 -> #81
14:52:32 <Fazio> Agenda+ Github Issue #130 Where to place "internal support" for MSE or dedicated A11Y Team?
14:52:32 <gb> /issues/130 -> #130
14:53:06 <Fazio> zakim, clear agenda
14:53:06 <Zakim> agenda cleared
14:53:23 <Fazio> agenda+ new business
14:53:42 <Fazio> Agenda+ Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update
14:54:02 <Fazio> Agenda+ Github Issue #81 Section 3.4.1 Proof Points for ICT Development Lifecycle: Missing planning aspects
14:54:21 <Fazio> Agenda+ Github #156 Issue Section 3.5: proof points should consider whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as a result of the efforts made.
14:54:37 <Fazio> Agenda+ Github Issue #130 Where to place "internal support" for MSE or dedicated A11Y Team?
14:59:49 <NehaJ> NehaJ has joined #maturity
15:04:58 <NehaJ> present+
15:05:02 <NehaJ> scribe+
15:05:06 <NehaJ> agenda
15:05:07 <Fazio> present+
15:05:13 <jkline> jkline has joined #maturity
15:05:14 <janina> janina has joined #maturity
15:05:17 <janina> present+
15:05:19 <NehaJ> zakim, take up item 1
15:05:19 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- new business -- taken up [from Fazio]
15:05:23 <jkline> present+
15:05:40 <NehaJ> agenda?
15:05:41 <gb> /issues/81 -> #81
15:05:41 <gb> /issues/156 -> #156
15:05:42 <gb> /issues/130 -> #130
15:06:11 <irali> irali has joined #maturity
15:06:19 <irali> present+
15:06:33 <NehaJ> Fazio: Equity and sustainability separate model of use existing and increase scope of maturity??
15:07:10 <NehaJ> janina: MM scope is a11y
15:08:01 <NehaJ> janina: This is may be W3C problem to be looked at and not MM or APA
15:09:35 <NehaJ> Fazio: Added comment stating separate dimension can be added
15:09:53 <NehaJ> Fazio: A meeting can be set up during TPAC
15:10:43 <jkline> queue+
15:12:02 <NehaJ> ack jkline
15:12:49 <NehaJ> jkline: I agree with Fazio that it is out of scope
15:21:06 <NehaJ> jkline: we have a good lead on MM now, it is being checked by people
15:21:44 <NehaJ> janina: we need a TPAC discussion for Equity and sustainability
15:22:50 <NehaJ> zakim, next item
15:22:50 <Zakim> agendum 2 -- Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update -- taken up [from Fazio]
15:23:17 <NehaJ> jkline: no furthur points to be discussed
15:23:36 <CharlesL1> CharlesL1 has joined #maturity
15:23:48 <CharlesL1> present+
15:24:32 <NehaJ> jkline: right now it is workable
15:24:53 <CharlesL1> q+
15:24:54 <NehaJ> Fazio: can we get feedback from people at TPAC
15:26:04 <NehaJ> jkline: can we inform public that it is public?
15:26:44 <NehaJ> janina: yes we can push for review or try out
15:26:58 <NehaJ> q?
15:27:16 <NehaJ> ack CharlesL1
15:28:38 <NehaJ> CharlesL1: not sure if everyone has gone through the excel sheet, first review pointed out lot of issues, please check a11y of it and try it
15:34:24 <NehaJ> zakim, next item
15:34:24 <Zakim> I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, NehaJ
15:34:37 <NehaJ> q?
15:34:44 <NehaJ> ack CharlesL1
15:34:46 <CharlesL1> ack me
15:34:54 <NehaJ> zakim, next item
15:34:54 <Zakim> agendum 3 -- Github Issue #81 Section 3.4.1 Proof Points for ICT Development Lifecycle: Missing planning aspects -- taken up [from Fazio]
15:34:54 <gb> /issues/81 -> #81
15:36:19 <Fazio> https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/81
15:36:20 <gb> https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/81 -> Issue 81 Section 3.4.1 Proof Points for ICT Development Lifecycle: Missing planning aspects (by maryjom)
15:37:49 <Fazio> https://w3c.github.io/maturity-model/#development-lifecycle-proof-points
15:41:14 <NehaJ> jkline: We can add new section with requirements and planning
15:43:52 <NehaJ> Fazio: should all steps be sequential?
15:44:18 <NehaJ> jkline: for development it make sense for sequence
15:45:07 <NehaJ> CharlesL1: everything we add in the document should also reflected in the spreadsheet
15:46:42 <NehaJ> zakim, next item
15:46:42 <Zakim> agendum 4 -- Github #156 Issue Section 3.5: proof points should consider whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as a result of the efforts made.
15:46:42 <gb> /issues/156 -> #156
15:46:45 <Zakim> ... -- taken up [from Fazio]
15:47:13 <Fazio> https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/156
15:47:14 <gb> https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/156 -> Issue 156 Section 3.5: proof points should consider whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as a result of the efforts made. (by jasonjgw)
15:47:41 <NehaJ> Fazio: No meeting next week
15:49:21 <NehaJ> jkline: refering recruiting section
15:50:18 <NehaJ> jkline: 3.5.1.1 Targeted Recruiting
15:53:32 <NehaJ> jkline: commenting on the issue
15:53:54 <NehaJ> janina: check for the usage of satisfying
15:56:32 <NehaJ> Issue updated with comments
15:58:26 <NehaJ> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
15:58:27 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/07/03-maturity-minutes.html NehaJ
16:04:28 <NehaJ> NehaJ has left #maturity
16:12:48 <janina> zakim, bye
16:12:48 <Zakim> leaving.  As of this point the attendees have been NehaJ, Fazio, janina, jkline, irali, CharlesL
16:12:48 <Zakim> Zakim has left #maturity
16:12:58 <janina> rrsagent, bye
16:12:58 <RRSAgent> I see no action items