11:00:23 RRSAgent has joined #wot-uc 11:00:27 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/06/26-wot-uc-irc 11:00:27 meeting: WoT Use Case 11:00:34 s/Use Case/Use Cases/ 11:01:04 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Luca_Barbato, Michael_McCool 11:01:13 McCool has joined #wot-uc 11:02:40 chair: Mizushima 11:07:01 Ege has joined #wot-uc 11:07:15 scribenick: Ege 11:07:43 topic: Agenda Review 11:07:46 agenda: https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/main/TODO/20240626.md 11:07:58 q+ 11:08:22 tm: any remarks on the agenda? 11:08:30 kaz: we should review the editors list in wiki 11:08:52 mm: we can move some to the past editors 11:09:09 ... a TF resolution should be enough 11:09:13 q- 11:09:16 q+ 11:09:52 ek: any new people? 11:10:02 tm: we can propose Luca and Ege 11:10:29 proposal: Change the status of Michael Lagally and Ryuichi Matsukura to "Previous Editors" and update this in the wiki and in the Editor's version of the Use Cases and Requirements document. 11:10:30 ... as additional editors 11:10:33 i/we should review/subtopic: Use Case Editors/ 11:10:59 q? 11:11:01 mm: we can add new editors separately 11:11:09 ... also someone needs to make a PR 11:11:14 ack lu 11:11:36 lb: we should discuss this since it applies to other TFs as well 11:11:41 q+ 11:11:47 ... to freshen up the editors list 11:11:57 mm: we should remind TFs but they should happen with the TF 11:12:06 q- 11:12:11 s/with the/within the/ 11:12:22 proposal: Change the status of Michael Lagally and Ryuichi Matsukura to "Previous Editors" and update this in the wiki and in the Editor's version of the Use Cases and Requirements document. 11:12:40 q? 11:12:43 s/discuss this/discuss this also in the Main Call,/ 11:12:58 mm: any objections? 11:13:01 resolution: Change the status of Michael Lagally and Ryuichi Matsukura to "Previous Editors" and update this in the wiki and in the Editor's version of the Use Cases and Requirements document. 11:13:18 q? 11:13:45 mm: Mizushima-san can you do a PR to change it in the editor's draft? 11:14:17 (next time is ok...) 11:14:31 mm: it can be done later 11:14:41 tm: we can add new people as well 11:14:51 mm: I can change the proposal above 11:14:56 ... who did you have in mind? 11:15:03 tm: I would like to add Ege and Luca 11:15:16 q+ 11:15:23 ... I can propose it in the main call 11:15:35 mm: each tf can propose their editors 11:15:55 ... we can have a resolution here and then confirm in the main call 11:17:29 kaz: we can do it in the TFs 11:17:42 mm: we just don't have it as a policy 11:18:33 kaz: we can record our resolution as TF resolution. We can have a group resolution in the main call 11:18:41 mm: let me type a TF resolution 11:19:16 s/we can do it in the TFs/we've been handling Editor assignment within TF so far, but I'm OK to clarify a clearer policy also./ 11:19:24 proposal: Propose Luca Barbato and Ege Korkan as new Editors for the Use Case and Requirements document, and request a resolution to confirm in the WG main call. 11:19:29 s/we can reco/for today, we can reco/ 11:20:09 resolution: Propose Luca Barbato and Ege Korkan as new Editors for the Use Case and Requirements document, and request a resolution to confirm in the WG main call. 11:20:27 rrsagent, make log public 11:20:32 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:20:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/06/26-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:20:40 q? 11:20:40 ack k 11:21:14 zakim, who is on the call? 11:21:14 Present: Kaz_Ashimura, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Luca_Barbato, Michael_McCool 11:22:58 topic: Notes 11:23:09 tm: please use q+ for questions in irc 11:23:44 tm: also please let's speak slowly and concisely and clearly 11:24:08 topic: Logistics 11:24:37 tm: in summer vacation we can cancel call but no concrete plans so far 11:24:38 q+ 11:24:49 s/call/calls 11:25:43 ack m 11:25:48 q+ 11:26:14 ack k 11:26:50 mm: I have noted the vacations on main wiki 11:27:18 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Holidays_and_Upcoming_Events Holidays and Upcoming Events on the main wiki 11:27:43 topic: Meeting Plan 11:27:49 i|Plan|kaz: so we should refer to the main wiki too| 11:27:55 i/so we/scribenick: kaz/ 11:27:59 scribenick: Ege 11:28:42 q+ 11:29:41 ack e 11:29:57 q+ 11:30:07 tm: (presents the plan) 11:30:08 ek: should we start asking use cases from the outside starting next week 11:30:16 q+ McCool 11:30:18 q- later 11:30:25 ack m 11:30:26 mm: I think it is better to have requirements first so that use case descriptions can be more concrete 11:30:39 kaz: I tend to agree with McCool 11:30:56 q+ 11:31:05 ack k 11:31:10 kaz: WoT JP CG and WoT CG can do some tests with initial use cases 11:31:54 s/kaz: WoT JP/... but maybe WoT JP/ 11:32:16 q+ 11:32:16 tm: I have an initial proposal for the time to start collecting 11:32:38 s/with McCool/with McCool, and it would be better to wait until the Requirement template is also done 11:32:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:32:45 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/06/26-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:32:51 ack mc 11:33:00 q+ 11:33:31 q+ 11:33:36 ack e 11:33:46 q- later 11:34:14 ack m 11:34:21 ek: we have use cases already in the TD and Binding TF. I would focus on those before making a call for use cases 11:34:33 mm: we should review those use cases first 11:34:48 ack k 11:35:12 q+ 11:35:47 kaz: agree with both. let's try some tests within the WoT-WG/IG first, and for that purpose, let's review existing candidate use cases 11:35:56 i/agree/scribenick: kaz/ 11:36:01 scribenick; Ege 11:36:05 ack m 11:36:14 q+ 11:36:36 tm: I would like to start collecting since we did not have a call for the last 5 weeks 11:36:45 mm: there is no schedule on the document publication 11:37:26 q+ 11:37:28 ack k 11:37:33 kaz: we can keep the old ones as old use cases and concentrate on new ones 11:37:40 q+ 11:37:54 mm: I want to write the current requirements or reason why we have the features we currently have 11:38:08 q+ 11:38:29 ack m 11:38:46 ack kaz 11:38:58 kaz: we can do that and refine based on the new template 11:39:45 s/do that/do that by picking up some of the existing use cases,/ 11:39:59 s/refine ba/refine those use cases ba/ 11:40:06 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:40:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/06/26-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:40:43 q+ 11:41:14 q+ 11:41:59 ack e 11:42:02 ack m 11:42:16 ek: I agree with what McCool has said. We have an issue about that above. Also Arch document would have been like that. I am not sure if we have time to do all that 11:42:36 q+ 11:42:45 i|I agree|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1889 wot-thing-description Issue 1889| 11:43:02 mm: we can use arch document for technical requirements and use cases for functional requirements 11:43:44 q? 11:43:55 mm: I think arch document should be a high level design document 11:44:12 s/Issue 1889/Issue 1889 - Documenting Design Decisions/ 11:44:30 s/high level/high-level/ 11:45:59 mm: or maybe the technical requirements should be in each document 11:46:16 q? 11:46:24 q- later 11:47:29 ack e 11:47:53 ek: The main thing I wanted to comment was that we should do a test run before going public. I want to see if we are all on the same page regarding the terms we use 11:48:13 q+ 11:48:41 mm: when do we publish the note? next year may etc? this needs to go here 11:48:52 kaz: we should have an explicit publication plan 11:49:04 ... we did great discussions in this call regarding refactoring 11:49:04 q+ 11:49:40 ack kaz 11:49:57 ... and we should record those points on specific steps to take 11:50:26 ek: +1 on prioritizing refactoring 11:50:38 +1 11:50:57 mm: some basic goal for publication is important 11:50:59 s/points on/points under the wot repository on/ 11:51:11 q? 11:51:59 ek: what does note publication mean? others TF need to wait for it? 11:52:25 mm: we should start working as other TFs on editor's draft already 11:52:26 s/points under the wot repository on specific steps to take/points on specific steps to take under the wot repository/ 11:52:30 q? 11:52:33 ack e 11:52:35 ack m 11:52:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:52:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/06/26-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:52:51 mm: we should discuss this in the main call 11:53:02 q+ 11:53:29 q- 11:53:41 topic: Minutes 11:53:50 -> https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-uc-minutes.html May-15 11:55:09 tm: any objection? 11:55:19 tm: minutes approved 11:56:17 tm: there are other points in the agenda but no time left 11:56:22 tm: let's focus on those next time 11:56:28 tm: adjourned 11:56:49 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:56:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/06/26-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 12:04:19 mahda has joined #wot-uc 12:38:58 s/scribenick; Ege/scribenick: Ege/ 12:39:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:39:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/06/26-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 13:56:57 Zakim has left #wot-uc 14:07:53 mahda has joined #wot-uc