14:02:06 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 14:02:10 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-irc 14:02:21 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF - Slot 1 14:02:57 mjk has joined #wot-td 14:04:08 chair: Ege, Koster 14:04:27 dape has joined #wot-td 14:04:38 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Luca_Barbato, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, Jan_Romann, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Koster 14:05:20 scribenick: cris 14:05:27 topic: Agenda 14:05:30 luca_barbato has joined #wot-td 14:05:35 ege: Agenda got a little bit shorter 14:05:56 ... we don't include PRs anymore they are hosted in the project table 14:06:11 ... reminder tomorrow is cancelled 14:07:06 Tomo has joined #wot-td 14:07:17 ... one organizational thing is about README update 14:07:21 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#May_15_2024 14:08:51 q+ 14:09:03 ... I created a PR that align the readme to the format 14:09:14 ... declared in the general template 14:09:34 q- 14:09:45 i/one orga/topic: README updates/ 14:09:46 ... I removed a TAG review link 14:10:02 ... a note from July 2023 14:10:18 ... rename a section to Publications 14:10:29 i|one orga|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2016 PR 2016 - Readme alignment| 14:10:41 rrsagent, make log public 14:10:42 ... one open point is the labeling convention which is not yet finished 14:10:44 q+ 14:10:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:10:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:11:22 i|one orga|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/blob/599904d7f236893c8746f59de9b6290aeb5dcf32/README.md rendered README.md| 14:11:35 ack c 14:11:36 q+ 14:11:36 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 14:12:01 cris: about the labeling conventions you can use the github page dedicated to list all the labels 14:12:27 ege: I want to mention categories and give more explanation later 14:12:58 dape: I didn't have time to review it before the call, there is a space missing 14:13:37 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:13:39 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:13:56 q+ 14:14:08 ack d 14:14:09 kaz: good direction thank you 14:14:10 ack k 14:14:22 ege: ok merged 14:14:55 topic: minutes review 14:15:05 ege: we already review them 14:15:10 i|we|-> https://www.w3.org/2024/05/08-wot-td-minutes.html May-8| 14:15:13 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:15:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:15:21 s/review/reviewed/ 14:15:43 ege: any objections? 14:15:50 ege: none, minutes approved 14:15:59 topic: TD errata 14:16:47 ege: we had a resolution in the main call to remove the script in the html file 14:16:57 ... if you go to the errata.html file 14:17:25 ... you can fine at line 11 12 to scripts that we will remove 14:17:32 s/line/lines/ 14:18:35 ... see the related issue 14:18:57 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2019 14:19:30 topic: toolchain discussion 14:19:57 ege: last week we talked about the toolchain and to create a short round of people to work on it 14:20:28 ... currently we are Mahda, Cris, Luca, Jan and myself. If you want to join we are using the TD zoom call 14:20:41 ... we noticed some issues and did some fixes 14:20:45 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2019|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2019 Issue 2019 - Removing errata rendering scripts| 14:21:11 ... typescript generation does not really work 14:21:23 ... json schema generation is broken too 14:21:42 ... we are working on this issues 14:22:16 topic: binding note review 14:22:30 ege: last week I've sent an email with a call for review 14:22:53 ... in the main call we confirm the resolution to publish the binding Templates 14:22:56 q+ 14:23:01 ... the review is until next week 14:23:05 ... right? 14:23:18 kaz: asked to McCool for confirmation 14:23:39 ege: following up on this, daniel created one issue 14:23:46 ... please create them now 14:23:49 ... don't be afraid 14:25:19 -> https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/#fig-mechanism figure 2 from Binding Templates 14:25:29 ege: it seems that the second point mentioned in the issue is not a problem 14:25:47 dape: right I was wrong 14:26:05 i|following|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/364 Issue 364 - Figure Improvement and minor bug| 14:26:11 q+ 14:26:45 kaz: given we have already sent the call for review (and made the resolution in the main call) we should let people know about the change 14:27:01 ege: sure we mentioned it in the changelog 14:27:10 kaz: but also sending a email 14:27:12 ege: ok 14:29:00 topic: Thing Description 14:29:32 ege: we can remove a bunch of draft items 14:30:03 ege: last we week we identified a set of issues to fixed quickly 14:30:12 ... they are all under the in progress column 14:30:32 ... try to do the work when you have time 14:30:40 mjk has joined #wot-td 14:30:42 q+ 14:31:30 q+ 14:31:31 q- 14:31:35 cris: with this layout is not easy to understand if a issue is ready for revie 14:31:38 ack cu 14:31:39 ack c 14:31:43 s/revie/review/ 14:31:43 ack d 14:31:54 dape: can't we use draft PRs for that? 14:32:13 ege: they show in the column with a different color 14:32:22 ack dape 14:32:25 -> https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/80/views/1 WoT TD Project 14:32:26 ... but we should not see PRs in that column 14:32:29 ... only issues 14:32:38 q? 14:33:10 dape: they can be useful to understand if the work is done or not 14:33:23 ege: yeah.. but it duplicates items 14:33:45 q+ 14:33:47 ... I would be fine to have another column and keep everything on the issue level 14:34:07 mk: done will just keep getting bigger and bigger 14:34:15 q+ 14:34:18 ... the in-review column is even more helpful 14:34:32 ack m 14:34:35 ... things will not be reviewed right-away 14:35:02 ... we can even remove done or rename it in-review 14:35:17 kaz: done means merged in closed so I agree that is really helpful 14:35:23 ack k 14:35:39 ege: ok then just delete the done column and add in-review 14:39:28 subtopic: Issue 1878 14:39:42 ege: this editorial change 14:39:53 ... it fixes some of html ids 14:40:03 ... in the examples 14:40:21 ... there should be no real diff 14:40:43 i|this edi|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1878 Issue 1878 - Wrong id for a security example| 14:41:10 i|this edi|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2015 PR 2015 - refactor: use proper ids for examples in Multiple Security Definitions| 14:41:14 dape: I also double checked if there was some reference to that id 14:41:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:41:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:41:28 ... I couldn't find any 14:42:23 ... merged 14:42:53 ege: noticed that the project is not updated correctly when you close the issue 14:43:22 ... I'm adding a new workflow for automation 14:43:40 ... but it seems I can't remove the card automatically 14:43:49 ... I can only move them to a column 14:44:04 ... I'm adding a done column that is not visible in the view 14:44:21 s/a column/a column ("Done" column with hide setting)/ 14:44:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:44:34 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:44:43 subtopic: issue 1957 14:45:11 ege: the PRs removes the titles in the ontology files 14:45:25 ... id in title 14:45:45 i|the PRs|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1957 Issue 1957 - title reference is not correctly linked| 14:45:49 ... we don't have a solution for 1.1 and 1.0 14:46:06 ... we can't change the id because it will break the link 14:46:19 i|the PRs|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2014 PR 2014 - remove title id from static files| 14:46:22 q+ 14:46:23 ... is it fine ? 14:46:49 luca: I would consider that the main part is that respec has a bug. 14:47:03 ... it is something that should be fixed in respec 14:47:06 i|the PRs|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2013 Issue 2013 - Holistic id definition rules| 14:47:18 ... for the PR itself, removing the id after the fact, for now it is fine 14:47:33 ... but respec needs to be fixed and somebody needs to open an issue in there 14:47:38 ege: agree 14:47:46 cris: +1 14:48:05 q+ 14:48:23 ege: what should we record in the issue? 14:48:31 q- 14:48:44 q+ 14:48:47 luca: respec should understand that the context of the ids 14:48:48 q+ 14:48:54 ege: it is not respec 14:49:01 ... it is our tooling 14:49:20 ... the problem is the toop level title generated by respec 14:50:20 luca: understood, then respec should try to be smart 14:50:27 q- 14:50:40 ack l 14:51:35 q+ 14:51:53 dape: I would open an issue with two options: respec check for coflicts/collisions and at least emit a warning (or even generate a new id) 14:51:59 ... or it could autofix it 14:52:09 ack d 14:52:26 jan: Or maybe you can add a configuration option to manually find it or generate it 14:52:43 q+ 14:53:58 ack j 14:54:00 ack k 14:54:00 kaz: id=title is required by the CSS for recomendation, you can also use the html validator 14:55:10 s/id=/class=/ 14:55:50 ege: the validator actually find the problem 14:55:56 ... we should have used it before publication 14:57:19 q? 14:57:47 cris has joined #wot-td 14:57:58 ege: ok pr merged 15:00:14 subtopic: Issue 1885 15:00:33 cris: I got some ghost changes, shoud I remove them? 15:00:37 ege: yes 15:01:09 ege: looking good 15:02:05 subtopic: Issue 1818 15:02:18 ege: we are overtime I'll look into it after the call 15:02:30 jan: great, I put one or two questions in the PR body. 15:02:51 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:02:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:02:58 [ajourned] 15:09:39 i|I got some g|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1885 Issue 1885 - Documenting that td-context-1.1.jsonld refers to JSON-LD spec version| 15:12:27 i|we are over|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1818 Issue 1818 - Better explain difference between observable properties and events| 15:12:30 [adjourned] 15:12:36 s/[adjourned]// 15:12:39 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:12:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 17:00:46 Zakim has left #wot-td