14:55:22 RRSAgent has joined #maturity 14:55:26 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-maturity-irc 14:55:27 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:55:28 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio 14:55:42 meeting: Maturity Model 14:55:58 Agenda+ New Business 14:56:28 Agenda+ Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update 14:56:54 NehaJadhav has joined #maturity 14:56:56 Agenda+ Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then 14:56:56 Agenda+ Github Issue #154 Section 3.3.1: can a measure of support effectiveness be included? 14:56:58 /issues/107 -> #107 14:56:58 /issues/154 -> #154 14:57:19 Agenda+ Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback) – Look at Procurement Dimension 14:57:42 Agenda+ Github #156 Issue Section 3.5: proof points should consider whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as a result of the efforts made. 14:57:42 /issues/156 -> #156 14:59:24 Mark_Miller has joined #Maturity 15:02:13 janina has joined #maturity 15:02:20 jkline has joined #maturity 15:02:20 present+ 15:02:29 present+ 15:02:42 present+ 15:02:43 zakim, who's here? 15:02:43 Present: janina, jkline, NehaJadhav 15:02:45 On IRC I see jkline, janina, Mark_Miller, NehaJadhav, RRSAgent, Zakim, Fazio, gb, kevin, alastairc 15:03:21 CharlesL has joined #maturity 15:04:27 scribe+ 15:04:40 scribe+ 15:05:02 zakim,next item 15:05:02 agendum 1 -- New Business -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:06:11 Dr_Keith has joined #maturity 15:07:18 jkline presented work in one of presentation in Austin, IAAP is also working on maturity model.. Need to check that work 15:09:12 Fazio IAAP working on smart city maturity model and not on web accessiblity - 4 years back update 15:11:58 zakim, next tiem 15:11:58 I don't understand 'next tiem', NehaJadhav 15:12:04 zakim, next item 15:12:04 agendum 2 -- Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:12:52 no update from scoring group 15:12:54 zakim, next item 15:12:54 agendum 2 was just opened, NehaJadhav 15:13:01 zakim, close item 15:13:01 I don't understand 'close item', NehaJadhav 15:13:07 zakim, close this item 15:13:07 agendum 2 closed 15:13:08 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:13:08 3. Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then [from Fazio] 15:13:08 /issues/107 -> #107 15:13:11 zakim, next item 15:13:11 agendum 3 -- Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:13:43 Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then 15:14:08 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/107 15:14:09 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/107 -> Issue 107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then (by jake-abma) 15:14:10 jkline has joined #maturity 15:14:16 present+ 15:18:33 Mark_Miller Optimization is the continuous process so it should be optimizing/ optimal. It is not completed, still there can be something to improve 15:19:20 q+ 15:19:35 ack CharlesL 15:20:14 jkline has joined #maturity 15:20:16 CharlesL We need to work on changing stage names 15:20:26 present+ 15:21:41 janina we should reject issue and close it 15:22:28 You are not complete when you are fully mature. In the fully mature stage, you should have processes in place to continue optimization. Optimal implies optimization does not continue. CMMI defines the final level of maturity as: 15:22:28 Maturity Level 5: Optimizing 15:22:28 Stable and flexible. Organization is focused on continuous improvement and is built to pivot and respond to opportunity and change. The organization’s stability provides a platform for agility and innovation. 15:24:35 Close issue 107 with comment: A maturity Model is a continuum, there is no end point. The Task Force has decided to keep the term optimize, as it suggests an ongoing effort without an end point. 15:25:12 RESOLUTION: Close issue 107 with comment: A maturity Model is a continuum, there is no end point. The Task Force has decided to keep the term optimize, as it suggests an ongoing effort without an end point. 15:25:39 zakim, next item 15:25:39 agendum 4 -- Github Issue #154 Section 3.3.1: can a measure of support effectiveness be included? -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:25:39 /issues/154 -> #154 15:25:51 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/154 15:25:52 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/154 -> Issue 154 Section 3.3.1: can a measure of support effectiveness be included? (by jasonjgw) 15:27:53 Dr_Keith there is already a way to add proof points 15:28:34 janina It is a good thing to add measure of support effectiveness 15:29:24 Jeff : It is not saying to add standard but to include it 15:30:42 Jeff: It is mentioned in one of the proof point 15:40:15 Jeff : we should find a way to include this measure to include 15:40:39 A long discussion of proof points and outcomes and their mapping 15:43:32 stacey has joined #Maturity 15:43:52 present+ 15:47:02 q? 15:47:03 q? 15:59:00 RRAgent, make minutes 15:59:10 please make minutes 15:59:18 oh thx 15:59:20 RRAgent, make the minutes 15:59:37 rrsagent, make minutes 15:59:38 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/15-maturity-minutes.html Fazio 16:06:35 CharlesL has left #maturity 16:53:03 janina has left #maturity 16:53:07 janina has joined #maturity 16:53:34 zakim, bye 16:53:34 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been janina, jkline, NehaJadhav, stacey 16:53:34 Zakim has left #maturity 16:53:40 rrsagent, bye 16:53:40 I see no action items