13:56:05 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 13:56:09 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-irc 13:56:35 zakim, this is RDF-star Semantics TF 13:56:35 got it, AndyS 13:58:49 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/05/02-rdf-star-minutes.html 13:58:50 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/05/09-rdf-star-minutes.html 13:58:50 meeting: RDF-star Semantics TF 13:58:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:58:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html MacTed 13:58:59 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:00:01 present+ TallTed, pfps, AndyS 14:00:16 present+ enrico 14:01:23 present+ niklasl, AZ 14:02:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:02:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 14:03:59 i/previous meeting/scribe: ?scribe? 14:04:00 i/previous meeting/chair: ?chair? 14:04:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:04:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 14:04:14 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 14:04:41 topic: discussion on profiles (many-to-many transparent and many-to-one opaque) and their exact definition 14:06:18 enrico has joined #rdf-star 14:06:33 s/?chair?/enrico 14:08:35 present+ 14:08:37 thomas has joined #rdf-star 14:08:37 q? 14:11:39 q+ 14:15:00 ack enrico 14:15:35 <<( :s :p :o )>> rdf:subject :s ; rdf:property :p ; rdf:object :o . 14:15:42 q+ 14:15:59 Souri has joined #rdf-star 14:16:05 present+ 14:16:14 ack thomas 14:17:03 We also have the question about that the rdf:type of rdf:reifies is. owl:ObjectProperty in OWL Full, I presume...? 14:17:27 s/about that the/about what the 14:17:46 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:17:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 14:21:27 AZ has joined #rdf-star 14:23:44 What did AndyS write. I was not connected to IRC 14:23:56 <<( :s :p :o )>> rdf:subject :s ; rdf:property :p ; rdf:object :o . 14:24:08 thx 14:27:23 in RDF 1.1, one can write: (:s :p :o) rdf:subject :s; rdf:predicate :p; rdf:object :o . Would you say that this is redundent, since :s is obviously the first element of a list of 3, so it must be the subject? 14:28:24 q+ 14:29:36 q- 14:30:20 Can already infer "non-triples" in D-entailment. 14:35:51 q+ 14:37:14 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 14:37:16 q+ 14:37:31 present+ 14:37:41 <<(:s :p :o)>> rdf:_1 :s; rdf:_2 :p; rdf:_3 :o . is this equally redundent as rdf:subject, etc.? 14:38:04 q+ 14:38:12 ack nikasl 14:38:20 ack niklasl 14:41:03 q+ 14:41:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:41:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 14:41:38 present+ 14:42:09 present+ 14:42:27 ack thomas 14:42:53 I am surprised, but I really agree with you thomas :D 14:44:32 Like others have repeatedly said, a literal "

"^^rdf:Triple is opaque... 14:45:00 niklasl: but that is not queryable 14:45:08 No. 14:46:00 Literals and their inner structure are querying to the extent that SPARQL provides datatype-specific functions or keywords (e.g. REGEX for strings) 14:46:12 but could be made queryable i reckon 14:46:27 mmm, granted, AZ, yet, not elegant 14:46:29 absolutely, thomas! 14:47:07 <<(:s :p :o)>> rdf:_1 :s; rdf:_2 :p; rdf:_3 :o . is this equally redundent as rdf:subject, etc.? 14:48:00 q+ 14:48:56 :x rdf:_1 :s; rdf:_2 :p; rdf:_3 :o . 14:49:17 entails <<(:s :p :o)>> a rdfs:resource 14:49:19 Souri has joined #rdf-star 14:49:23 present+ 14:49:37 <<(:s :p :o)>> owl:same-as :x. 14:50:05 but :x is just a list ?! 14:50:18 I don't understand, but doerthe is in the queue 14:50:19 sorry, a bag 14:50:34 yes, but I want you to answer as well :) 14:50:34 it's a bag container yes, nothing more. 14:50:35 One of bag/seq/alt 14:50:56 it's fine if you answer first, then I can think about this discusion 14:50:57 ah true, we don't know the rdf:type. 14:51:20 ack enrico 14:51:23 ack az 14:51:31 q- 14:51:49 I do not want to stop the flow, I am interested in this discussion :) 14:52:12 q+ 14:58:23 q+ 14:58:35 ack doerthe 15:02:10 <<( :s :p :o )>> a :TripleTerm . 15:02:10 :TripleTerm owl:hasKey (rdf:subject rdf:predicate rdf:object) . 15:03:26 q+ 15:06:32 one possibility is indeed going towards modal logic 15:06:45 fsasaki has joined #rdf-star 15:06:57 but there could be other ways 15:06:59 regrets+ 15:07:08 ... kind of like when a singleton property is used as a predicate in an asserted triple .... ("kind of")? 15:09:28 q? 15:11:27 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:11:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 15:12:06 are you sure this would be isomorphic (even when considering RDFS etc)? 15:13:14 q? 15:13:19 ack AZ 15:13:58 to decide, I want to fully understand, and that already helped :) 15:14:31 +1 exploring these concerns is clarifying 15:14:51 ack enrico 15:15:42 There are logics that are not modal but allow multiple local interpretations (e.g. DFOL, DDL, and anything with local model semantics) 15:19:50 q+ 15:19:56 mmm, and would you want to have multiple local interpretations? As an option? Based on the predicate for example? 15:21:01 (currently I am just enjoying playing with the ideas ;) ) 15:21:07 ack souri 15:21:17 ...but what is the domain of rdf:edge ? 15:21:43 And where is the set of use cases for those? 15:21:44 q+ 15:21:55 q+ 15:23:51 graph ::= ( triple | reifier rdf:reifies tripleTerm | reifier rdf:edge opaqueTripleTerm )* 15:26:28 <<:a :b :c>> 15:26:37 <<":a :b :c">> 15:27:40 <<( :a :b :c )>> instead of << :a :b :c >> I assume? 15:28:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:28:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 15:28:12 What is <<:a :b :c>> translated to? 15:41:46 thank you all for the explanations, that really helps me 15:54:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:54:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/03-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed