Meeting minutes
Organizational
<kaz> agenda for today
Draft minutes review
<kaz> Apr-24
Ege: Any minutes updates ?
… none -> approved
<kaz> Apr-25
Ege: No request for changes
… approving minutes
Ege: Errata related
TD
Ontology errata
<kaz> PR 2008 - Errata fixes
<kaz> PR 2009 - Ontology publication folder synchronization
Ege: 2 PRs
… w3c/
… w3c/
… both about ontology errata
Ege: There is a process for the errata
… there are issues labels and tracked by scripts
… script starts doing stuff .... since we are not using labels
… no difference between 1.0 and 1.1
… we might need to fork script and filter on TD version
Ege: or render everything ourselves
Daniel: Is there any downside when rendering ourselves ?
Ege: More work.. in case of multiple items
Cristiano: Wondering whether we can contribute back our updates
… fork might not be the right choice
… others would benefit
Ege: Good point
… seems to be on GitHub
Kaz: Mechanism is not a rule or policy
… rather best practices
… should use errata labels for errata issues only to avoid confusion
Ege: one aspect is the technical solution
… but everyone can add labels and we should be careful when using
Kaz: We should remind everyone of the errata "mechanism"
Ege: ok
… btw, I tend to prefer option 3 or 5 for the next step
… or option 1
Kaz: btw, do you mean "generating the HTML manually instead of the JS using the Errata label" by "create the rendered version ourselves"?
Ege: right
Kaz: ok
… btw, it would be clearer to put "Opt." to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, given you mean those are different options
Ege: ok
… (and adds "Option" to each)
[ PR 2008 itself has been merged ]
Ege: will create another issue for the next step
PR 2009
PR 2009 - Ontology publication folder synchronization
Ege: the link included in the Editor's draft doesn't work properly
… but it's wrong to put the link within a HTML because the Web browser assumes "text/html" as the media type
Kaz: could you clarify the point?
Ege: 2 separate URLs
… one for Download and another for Open
"value": "Download",
"href": "https://w3c.github.io/wot-resources/td/v1.1/ontology/jsonschema.ttl",
},
{
"value": "Open",
"href": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/wot-resources/main/td/v1.1/ontology/jsonschema.ttl"
Cristiano: maybe would be better to just have a link for "Download"
… not a strong opinion, though
Ege: will add some description about the content negotiation mechanism to the Editor's Draft too
Refactoring
PR 2010 - add binding appendix and fix respec erors
Kaz: ok with the PR itself. tx
… let's continue further updates
Ege: right
[ merged ]
Binding updates
Ege: would suggest we publish an updated Note for WoT Binding Templates
<Ege> proposal: Publish the current Binding Templates ED as a WG Note
Kaz: I'm OK with the publication itself, but we should explicitly describe our plan to include the content into the TD spec within the Status section (and possibly the diff section) of the Note.
<Ege> proposal: Publish the current Binding Templates ED as a WG Note with the following changes: Adjust the changelog, direct people to the TD in the status section
RESOLUTION: Publish the current Binding Templates ED as a WG Note with the following changes: Adjust the changelog, direct people to the TD in the status section
Project management
Ege: we've started to use the above Project (as a PoC)
Binding Templates
PR 354
<Ege> Delete context directory
<cris> +1 for mergining
Kaz: so we've changed the directory structure. right?
Ege: right
[ merged ]
PR 356
PR 356 - fix: move context tag from Sequence/Choice to NamedMember
Kaz: this is a bug fix. right?
Ege: correct
[ merged ]
AOB
Ege: we're done for today
… we'll continue to discuss registry, errata, etc.
[adjourned]