IRC log of apa on 2024-05-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:35:06 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #apa
- 12:35:10 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-apa-irc
- 12:35:10 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 12:35:11 [Zakim]
- please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), janina
- 12:35:27 [janina]
- Meeting: APA Weekly Teleconference
- 12:35:33 [janina]
- Date 01 May 2024
- 12:36:18 [janina]
- Chair: Janina
- 12:36:18 [janina]
- agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements
- 12:36:18 [janina]
- Agenda+ TPAC 2024 Planning Begins
- 12:36:18 [janina]
- agenda+ New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22
- 12:36:21 [janina]
- agenda+ HR A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
- 12:36:24 [janina]
- agenda+ Explicit Review Requests https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues
- 12:36:27 [janina]
- agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
- 12:36:29 [janina]
- agenda+ CSS Update (Paul) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues
- 12:36:32 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://github.com/issues/assigned
- 12:36:34 [janina]
- agenda+ Task Force & Deliverables Updates
- 12:36:37 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 12:36:39 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 12:52:48 [roy__]
- roy__ has joined #apa
- 12:58:15 [janina]
- /join #rqtf
- 13:55:41 [janina]
- present+
- 13:55:46 [janina]
- zakim, who's here?
- 13:55:46 [Zakim]
- Present: janina
- 13:55:48 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Roy, RRSAgent, Zakim, kirkwood, janina, gb, slightlyoff, tink, ada, Rachael, cwilso, agendabot, jcraig
- 13:58:16 [Fazio]
- Fazio has joined #Apa
- 13:59:28 [PaulG]
- PaulG has joined #apa
- 14:00:18 [PaulG]
- present+
- 14:00:30 [matatk]
- matatk has joined #apa
- 14:00:35 [matatk]
- present+
- 14:01:06 [Nichole]
- Nichole has joined #apa
- 14:01:13 [janina]
- regrets: Neha_Manik_Jadhav, Fredrik_Fischer
- 14:01:13 [Nichole]
- present+
- 14:01:47 [JenStrickland]
- JenStrickland has joined #apa
- 14:02:54 [matatk]
- scribe+
- 14:03:03 [janina]
- ~scribe+
- 14:03:13 [JenStrickland]
- present+
- 14:03:20 [JenStrickland]
- I can only attend for the first 20m
- 14:03:20 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:03:20 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:04:13 [janina]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2024Apr/0000.html
- 14:04:14 [matatk]
- janina: One announcement: CfC on adopting and publishing FPWD for Immersive CAptions CG report as a Note.
- 14:04:24 [matatk]
- q+
- 14:04:50 [janina]
- q?
- 14:05:02 [janina]
- ack ma
- 14:06:45 [matatk]
- matatk: One of our team members, Muadh (who was on this call a couple of months back) was wondering if they'd considered internationalization (i18n).
- 14:07:30 [matatk]
- janina: We'll be keeping in touch with the group, and have the standard process, which is to publish a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) to help us promote it, and seek comments.
- 14:07:47 [matatk]
- janina: RQTF has already read it and that's where we'd likely work on it in future.
- 14:07:55 [matatk]
- janina: Raja is engaged in this area.
- 14:08:09 [janina]
- q?
- 14:08:19 [janina]
- q?
- 14:08:27 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:08:27 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- TPAC 2024 Planning Begins -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:08:58 [Roy_]
- Roy_ has joined #apa
- 14:09:41 [matatk]
- janina: We need to declare our intentions wrt meetings by the 20th. We expect we will meet across the week. Already one expression of interest in meeting, from MEIG.
- 14:10:05 [matatk]
- janina: We committed to revise the MAUR to 2.0 - need to get funding for that work.
- 14:10:35 [matatk]
- janina: I tried to find funding for it, but haven't as of yet. Concerns/thoughts from all of you are welcome.
- 14:10:40 [janina]
- q?
- 14:10:47 [matatk]
- janina: Any comments/questions/ideas about upcoming TPAC and collab?
- 14:10:51 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:10:51 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:10:55 [matatk]
- gb, off
- 14:10:55 [gb]
- matatk, issues and names were already off.
- 14:11:24 [alisa_smith]
- alisa_smith has joined #apa
- 14:11:29 [matatk]
- zakim, close this item
- 14:11:29 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 closed
- 14:11:30 [Zakim]
- I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 14:11:30 [Zakim]
- 4. HR A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review [from janina]
- 14:11:32 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:11:32 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- HR A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:11:34 [alisa_smith]
- present+
- 14:11:44 [Roy_]
- subtopic: [css-view-transitions] Users need to be able to disable view transitions
- 14:11:45 [Roy_]
- - issue: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10267
- 14:12:45 [JenStrickland]
- For the MAUR reference earlier, I found this link: https://github.com/w3c/maur/
- 14:13:02 [Roy_]
- https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/886
- 14:14:35 [matatk]
- PaulG: This is similar to the page-level animations discussed last month. prefers-reduced-motion should limit or shut it off - if that's not mentioned here that's an important comment.
- 14:16:55 [matatk]
- PaulG: The second link is about Document Render Blocking, which is related, and I'll check will be covered similarly to View Transitions.
- 14:17:35 [JenStrickland]
- https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10267
- 14:17:47 [JenStrickland]
- PaulG https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10267
- 14:19:19 [PaulG]
- I'm looking at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7440 which has more info about this (not closed)
- 14:22:14 [matatk]
- matatk: So our answer to this is 'Yes!'
- 14:22:18 [matatk]
- JenStrickland: +1
- 14:22:21 [matatk]
- janina: +1
- 14:22:24 [matatk]
- PaulG: +1
- 14:22:33 [Roy_]
- subtopic: Use v2 context for the data-integrity
- 14:22:34 [Roy_]
- - issue: https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/pull/147
- 14:22:44 [Fazio]
- Fazio has joined #apa
- 14:23:07 [Fazio]
- present+
- 14:23:18 [JenStrickland]
- +1
- 14:24:19 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:24:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 -- Explicit Review Requests https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:25:35 [matatk]
- janina: RQTF doesn't have any concerns
- 14:26:09 [matatk]
- Paul raised an issue on our call last week: https://www.w3.org/2024/04/24-apa-minutes#t06
- 14:26:34 [matatk]
- s/doesn't have any concerns/doesn't have any concerns about the TAG Privacy Principles/
- 14:27:43 [matatk]
- PaulG: It was around ensuring the most vulnerable have the same access and privacy protections.
- 14:32:16 [matatk]
- PaulG: There is a section, 1.2, about vulnerability. Doesn't mention disability specifically but it is good. I'll check whether my comments were addressed and follow up if need be.
- 14:32:29 [matatk]
- janina: It is a big document - maybe needs an index?
- 14:33:12 [matatk]
- PaulG: I'll probably come back to it - there is mention of 'additional' protections, but my point is that also the _standard_ ones need to be available to vulnerable people.
- 14:33:42 [matatk]
- janina: What's the timeframe?
- 14:36:23 [matatk]
- matatk: Need to sign off - if we are happy for it to be published - today.
- 14:36:47 [matatk]
- PaulG: It's a great document - but we need to make sure, e.g. that we don't end up with CAPTCHA 3.0 in the race to make things more private/secure.
- 14:37:27 [matatk]
- janina: We have an update pending to our CAPTCHA document from 2019.
- 14:37:44 [matatk]
- janina: Any objection to signing off on this, modulo the foregoing discussion?
- 14:37:57 [matatk]
- Fazio: No objection - doesn't WCAG 2.2 Accessible Authentication help here?
- 14:38:10 [matatk]
- PaulG: Specifically for auth yes, but the principles in this document are much wider.
- 14:38:20 [matatk]
- PaulG: Would like to borrow some of that language.
- 14:38:29 [janina]
- Q?
- 14:38:57 [matatk]
- PaulG: Access comes up in Transparency section; not Consent/Widthdrawl. Need to make sure that APIs developed are carrying appropriate data.
- 14:39:13 [matatk]
- Fazio: John Rochford was the main person on the accessible auth stuff - suggest connecting with him.
- 14:40:15 [Fazio]
- John Rochford is the point person for accessible authentication
- 14:41:07 [matatk]
- q?
- 14:41:13 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:41:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 -- new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:41:23 [matatk]
- zakim, close this item
- 14:41:23 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 closed
- 14:41:24 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 14:41:24 [Zakim]
- 7. CSS Update (Paul) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues [from janina]
- 14:41:25 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:41:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 7 -- CSS Update (Paul) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:42:03 [PaulG]
- https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10244
- 14:42:29 [matatk]
- subtopic: prefers-interaction-side
- 14:42:56 [matatk]
- PaulG: This was posted in the accessibility Slack channel. I'd like to hear some feedback from the community.
- 14:43:50 [matatk]
- ... The concept is a media query that would allow specific controls to move from one side of the UI to another, for disability and preference reasons. Could be something like dark mode - widely used - but it's really for someone who struggles with controls on a specific side.
- 14:43:51 [matatk]
- q?
- 14:43:53 [matatk]
- q+
- 14:44:00 [matatk]
- ack me
- 14:46:05 [matatk]
- matatk: I was thinking about widescreen monitors and space wasted by toolbars on the top. Used to be options in various Linux/UNIX GUIs to have toolbars on the side or bottom instead. Related?
- 14:46:08 [matatk]
- PaulG: +1
- 14:46:11 [roy__]
- roy__ has joined #apa
- 14:46:22 [matatk]
- PaulG: There's not really mention of that in the issue; suggest you comment.
- 14:47:02 [matatk]
- ... For Dark Mode it starts with a system preference. This is more web-focused. Coudl be adopted by others for other use cases?
- 14:47:15 [matatk]
- q?
- 14:47:36 [matatk]
- PaulG: Is this something that Adapt TF would want to talk about?
- 14:47:47 [matatk]
- ... and maybe communities they talk to?
- 14:48:52 [matatk]
- matatk: Worth mentioning in the call and hearing thoughts on this - I'll raise it with them
- 14:49:01 [matatk]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:49:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-apa-minutes.html matatk
- 14:49:12 [matatk]
- PaulG: Could be good for generating use cases.
- 14:49:36 [matatk]
- matatk: RQTF too maybe - let's spread the news within APA
- 14:50:09 [matatk]
- ... Maybe worth announcing there. Maybe ARIA will be interested.
- 14:51:07 [matatk]
- PaulG: All the examples given are left/right. But your new use case is e.g. top to left - need JS for that now. Need to link to Media Queries, API, observer, accessibility properties. Lots of steps; need other groups to weigh in.
- 14:51:17 [matatk]
- q?
- 14:51:27 [matatk]
- zakim, next item
- 14:51:27 [Zakim]
- agendum 8 -- Actions Checkin (Specs) https://github.com/issues/assigned -- taken up [from janina]
- 14:54:59 [PaulG]
- https://toolbox.humandeluxe.com/marissa-mayer-principles/
- 14:55:55 [matatk]
- *general discussion on the CSS color/shape issues from prior weeks*
- 14:56:01 [matatk]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:56:02 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-apa-minutes.html matatk
- 15:42:05 [PaulG]
- PaulG has left #apa
- 15:55:44 [wendyreid]
- wendyreid has joined #apa
- 18:18:54 [janina]
- zakim, bye
- 18:18:55 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been janina, PaulG, matatk, Nichole, JenStrickland, alisa_smith, Fazio
- 18:18:55 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #apa
- 18:19:05 [janina]
- rrsagent, bye
- 18:19:05 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items