00:22:55 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 00:49:55 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 02:20:49 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 04:00:19 kaz has joined #wot-td 04:17:25 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 04:42:10 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 05:43:44 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 07:45:31 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 09:02:22 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 09:47:52 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 10:48:29 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 12:50:16 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 12:58:51 mjk has joined #wot-td 13:00:04 Zakim has joined #wot-td 13:00:07 rrsagent, bye 13:00:07 I see no action items 13:00:11 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 13:00:11 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-irc 13:00:20 Ege has joined #wot-td 13:00:26 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF - Slot 2 13:00:35 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Michael_Koster 13:01:21 mahda has joined #wot-td 13:01:32 present+ Mahda_Noura 13:01:40 scribenick: Ege 13:01:43 chair: Koster 13:05:30 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#April_24_and_25_2024 13:05:37 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 13:07:59 Tomo has joined #wot-td 13:08:15 present+ Jan_Romann, Kunihiko_Toumua 13:08:21 s/Toumua/Toumura/ 13:08:30 rrsagent, make log public 13:08:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:08:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:08:44 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 13:09:25 topic: Agenda 13:10:06 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#April_24_and_25_2024 agenda for today 13:10:16 mjk: there are some priorities 13:10:40 ... like refactoring 13:10:46 topic: Minutes 13:10:58 mjk: if you see something, shout otu 13:11:03 i|topic:|[ Refactoring (Binding to TD), Small PRs, if time left: Resource Management and Registry Requirements ]| 13:11:03 s/otu/out 13:11:08 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:11:09 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:11:28 i|if you|-> https://www.w3.org/2024/04/18-wot-td-minutes.html Apr-18| 13:12:46 luca_barbato has joined #wot-td 13:13:01 mjk: any comments on the minutes? 13:13:09 q? 13:13:24 mjk: minutes are approved 13:14:05 topic: Refactoring 13:15:17 mjk: So you have a PR on it right? 13:15:26 ek: yes we have PR 2000 that makes the move 13:15:58 ... also a small PR on binding templates 13:16:12 subtopic: PR 360 in Bindings 13:16:41 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/pull/360 Binding PR 360 - Header Alignment 13:16:48 q? 13:16:51 q+ 13:17:33 -> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/360/b0600ce...02895f9.html diff 13:17:35 q+ 13:18:21 ek: I had to clean up some headers. I think we should be careful with simple HTML formatting stuff 13:18:25 q- kaz 13:18:28 mjk: ok I see 13:18:35 kaz: Let's look at the diff version 13:18:50 ack lu 13:19:14 lb: changes are fine, please merge 13:19:39 ... I think we will solve this issue when we adopt markdown and use bikeshed to turn things into html 13:20:31 mjk: so it won't be an issue going forward 13:21:22 ... so let's quickly go over it 13:21:31 ... ok so it looks good 13:21:35 q? 13:22:10 q+ 13:22:44 q+ 13:22:45 ack k 13:23:06 kaz: from respec point of view, it is not an issue 13:23:28 ktoumura has joined #wot-td 13:23:28 ... from html point of view, it is good to change that 13:24:20 q? 13:24:33 ack e 13:24:46 ek: it was rendering fine but it was wrong in the beginning 13:24:51 mjk: let's merge this PR 13:24:57 subtopic: PR 2000 in TD 13:25:36 s/change that/change that. BTW, regarding the extra subsection title for introductory text, it was jus our chosen style was redundant./ 13:26:08 mjk: so all the headers got shifted 13:26:15 i|so all|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2000 TD PR 2000 - Binding mechanism refactoring| 13:26:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:26:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:27:10 i|so all|-> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/2000/1e16b24...b292166.html diff| 13:27:27 ... otherwise nothing else has changed at this moment 13:28:53 q+ 13:28:59 Ktoumura has joined #wot-td 13:30:06 ek: I think I should have checked the references since now all references became informative 13:30:34 q? 13:31:06 ... I can change the references 13:31:31 ack k 13:31:31 kaz: I am fine with the PR as is and we can do small changes 13:31:39 ... since it is just the first PR 13:31:46 s/changes/changes after merging this/ 13:32:50 q+ 13:33:38 ack e 13:33:53 ek: we can open issues now for the follow up points 13:34:05 mjk: merged 13:35:11 subtopic: Issue 1987 for TD 13:35:26 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1987 TD Issue 1987 - Moving Binding Mechanism Text to TD 13:35:36 scribe+ 13:35:51 ek: maybe we can close this issue and then create another issue for follow-up 13:36:24 https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/#sec-payload-examples 13:36:26 ... btw, we need to discuss how to handle the appendix of the Binding Templates spec 13:36:43 s|https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/#sec-payload-examples|| 13:37:04 -> https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/#sec-payload-examples Appendix B. Examples of Payloads and Data Schemas from IoT Platforms and Standards 13:37:06 mjk: let's see the appendix 13:37:22 i/let's/scribenick: Ege/ 13:37:39 mjk: so only the 3 example pairs are missing 13:39:00 q+ 13:39:09 mjk: should we create an issue 13:39:15 ek: yes otherwise I will forget 13:40:02 ack k 13:42:15 scribe+ 13:42:22 ek: let's see the project also 13:42:25 -> https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/80 TD Project 13:42:49 ek: then we can categorize and assign 13:43:04 i/ek:/ek: Issue 2005 is listed on the "Categorized" column/ 13:43:11 i/then/scribenick: Ege/ 13:43:17 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:43:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:43:24 scribe+ 13:43:48 ek: after assigning the issue to me, we can move it to the "Assigned" column 13:44:04 ... then the "In Progress" column 13:44:10 ek: since I know that I can work on it 13:44:21 i/since/scribenick: Ege/ 13:44:27 mjk: Ok we can move back to the other issues 13:45:27 mjk: then we can create new issue for the overlaps 13:46:07 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2006 Issue 2006 - Fix overlaps between TD and Bindings content 13:46:12 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:46:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:46:44 subtopic: Binding Core Document 13:46:55 mjk: We will create other documents for registry and policy 13:47:41 q? 13:47:49 i|let's see|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2005 TD Issue 2005 - Add Appendix B from the Binding Templates document to the merged TD document| 13:48:04 s/Issue 2006 -/TD Issue 2006 -/ 13:48:06 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:48:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:48:14 ek: we can delete it or turn into a registry definition 13:48:22 q? 13:48:28 mjk: yeah or the registry can be in the TD 13:48:36 q+ 13:48:56 i|We will cr|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1987 TD Issue 1987 - Moving Binding Mechanism Text to TD| 13:48:58 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:49:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:49:20 ... what are the tradeoffs between having the registry in the TD or binding template 13:49:34 ... having it in the TD will make the TD longer 13:50:09 lb: the TD document may end up being way too big 13:50:28 ... on the other hand, the protocol binding and registry should be a small section 13:51:23 i|the TD doc|-> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-profile-registry/#registry FYI, Registry section of "TTML Media Type Definition and Profile Registry" Note 13:51:30 ... if you want to write a binding, you have to be aware of TD 13:51:32 q+ 13:51:37 ... so there is no separation of concerns 13:51:41 ack l 13:51:42 q? 13:52:17 q+ 13:52:27 kaz: I tend to agree with luca 13:52:32 ack k 13:52:53 ... starting separately would be fine in the beginning 13:52:55 ... separating them would be easier to manage 13:53:00 ... we can change later as well 13:53:01 q+ 13:53:04 q+ 13:53:09 q? 13:54:37 lb: there is no real pros or cons, there will be an entry point 13:54:45 ... it depends on how intense the whole section will be 13:55:28 ack lu 13:55:30 ack e 13:55:55 q+ 13:56:53 -> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-profile-registry/#registry FYI (again), Registry section of "TTML Media Type Definition and Profile Registry" Note 13:56:55 https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/discussions/241 13:57:15 q? 13:57:25 ek: there can be issues with having a coupling between td version and a binding 13:57:41 ... it is easier to manage that if the registry is in a td document 13:58:04 ... probably we need to agree on how the registry table looks like first 13:58:07 kaz: we should think about our requirements 13:58:08 ack k 13:58:51 ... and have a look at ttwg work 13:59:10 lb: if we have td 3.0, all the bindings will need to update 13:59:35 ... so there needs to be a registry per td spec version 13:59:35 s/kaz: we should think about our requirements/kaz: basically, agree but we can make decision about "how to describe the registry mechanism" later, and we should clarify our requirements first/ 13:59:38 q+ 14:00:26 s/and have a look at ttwg work/for that purpose, we can take a look at the TTWG's work again./ 14:00:36 ek: I think we can agree that the binding core document will be empty or non-existent if the binding registry lives in the TD spec 14:00:45 s/need to update/need to get updated/ 14:00:58 mjk: aob? 14:01:21 mjk: no call on wednesday, we meet next week thursday 14:01:32 [adjourned] 14:01:37 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:01:38 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:32:06 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 14:32:14 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 16:00:50 Zakim has left #wot-td 16:07:26 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 16:36:45 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 17:59:28 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:16:05 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:39:34 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:55:38 JKRhb has joined #wot-td