15:55:25 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:55:30 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-irc 15:55:31 meeting: RDF-Star WG biweekly meeting 15:55:48 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240321T120000/ 15:55:48 clear agenda 15:55:48 agenda+ Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html , -> 2 https://www.w3.org/2024/03/14-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:55:48 agenda+ Proposal for next week's discussion -> 3 https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240321T120000/TBD 15:55:49 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 4 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 15:55:51 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at -> 5 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 15:55:54 agenda+ Issue Triage, available at -> 6 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/5 15:55:56 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 15:57:05 Regrets: enrico, Dominik_T 15:58:02 present+ 15:58:31 present+ 16:00:18 eBremer has joined #rdf-star 16:00:32 olaf has joined #rdf-star 16:00:34 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 16:00:46 fsasaki has joined #rdf-star 16:00:51 Regrets for today 16:01:14 ora has joined #rdf-star 16:01:20 Regrets+ Tpt 16:02:01 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 16:02:01 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:06 present+ 16:02:09 present+ 16:02:09 present+ 16:02:09 Scribe: tl 16:02:12 present+ 16:02:15 chair: ora 16:03:11 Regrets: gkellog 16:03:43 Zakim, open item 1 16:03:43 agendum 1 -- Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html , -> 2 https://www.w3.org/2024/03/14-rdf-star-minutes.html -- 16:03:46 ... taken up [from agendabot] 16:03:48 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:03:48 Present: AndyS, tl, olaf, niklasl, pfps, eBremer, ora, fsasaki, doerthe 16:03:59 pchampin has changed the topic to: RDF-Star WG -- 2024-03-21 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240321T120000/ 16:04:08 Both minutes look fine. 16:04:09 ora: look at minutes - any worries, concerns? 16:04:23 q? 16:04:42 LGTM 16:04:43 PROPOSAL: Accept last week's minutes https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:04:50 +1 16:04:52 +1 16:04:53 +1 16:04:53 +1 16:04:54 +1 16:04:54 +1 16:05:02 And two weeks ago minutes 16:05:06 AZ has joined #rdf-star 16:05:19 present+ 16:05:20 The pointer it to two weeks ago, not last week. 16:05:26 s/it/is/ 16:05:35 +1 16:05:47 PROPOSAL: Accept last week's and two week's agos minutes https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:06:12 PROPOSAL: Accept last week's and two week's agos minutes https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html and https://www.w3.org/2024/03/14-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:06:16 +1 16:06:21 +1 16:06:23 +1 16:06:23 +1 16:06:24 +1 16:06:28 s/agos/ago 16:06:28 +1 16:06:43 +1 16:06:49 +1 16:06:53 +1 16:06:59 +1 16:07:04 +1 16:07:10 RESOLUTION: Accept last week's and two week's agos minutes https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html and https://www.w3.org/2024/03/14-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:07:19 Zakim, next item 16:07:19 agendum 2 -- Proposal for next week's discussion -> 3 https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240321T120000/TBD -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:07:37 The link for "next week's discussion" is broken. 16:07:38 ora: topic for next week 16:07:38 q? 16:07:44 q+ 16:08:06 ack AndyS 16:08:20 andy: meta suggestion - do we need 2 hours? 16:08:49 q+ 16:08:56 ack ktk 16:09:20 ktk: alternating? 16:09:29 andy: yes, still alternating 16:10:00 +1 to alternate admin/tech. I think 1 h still may be a bit too little at times? 1.5? 16:11:04 ora: would like to have the option to talk longer when the need arises 16:11:37 ... and we do know in advance what we talk about, so could plan accordingly 16:12:15 ... proposal: go for 1 hour meetings every time, extend if needed, always start at the same time 16:12:49 PROPOSAL: Let's go back to 1 hr per week, still alternating between administrative and substantive discussions 16:13:01 Regrets+ souri 16:13:03 +1 16:13:06 +1 16:13:07 +1 16:13:09 +1 16:13:12 +1 16:13:12 +1 16:13:15 +1 16:13:17 +1 16:13:17 +1 16:13:24 present+ 16:13:32 +1 16:13:34 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:13:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk 16:13:37 +1 16:13:44 RESOLVED: Let's go back to 1 hr per week, still alternating between administrative and substantive discussions 16:13:46 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:14:02 q+ 16:14:07 ora: what do want to talk about next week? 16:14:32 Regrets+ Dominik_T, enrico 16:14:56 ... proposal: talk about if a single id can name more than one triple occurrence 16:15:04 ... a bit worried about that 16:15:45 q? 16:16:31 ack niklasl 16:16:34 s/one triple occurrence/one triple term 16:16:35 +1, "one triple" rather than "one triple occurrence" 16:16:38 indeed, "... more than one triple term" 16:17:24 niklasl: un-starring a related topic, also RDF/XML 16:17:47 ... s/name/reify 16:19:04 s/single id can name/single id can reify 16:19:36 I think you need to add a "/" at the end 16:20:21 s|... s/name/reify|| 16:20:44 PROPOSAL: Discuss if a single id can reify more than one triple? 16:21:06 +1 16:21:07 +1 16:21:10 +1 16:21:13 +1 16:21:15 +0 16:21:16 +1 16:21:16 +1 16:21:19 +1 16:21:20 +1 16:21:24 +1 16:21:29 +1 16:21:41 RESOLUTION: Discuss if a single id can reify more than one triple? 16:21:53 Zakim, next item 16:21:53 agendum 3 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 4 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:21:58 q? 16:22:27 Zakim, next item 16:22:27 agendum 3 was just opened, ktk 16:22:32 Zakim, close item 3 16:22:32 agendum 3, Review of open actions, available at -> 4 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3, closed 16:22:34 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:22:34 4. Review of pull requests, available at -> 5 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 [from agendabot] 16:22:45 Zakim, open item 4 16:22:45 agendum 4 -- Review of pull requests, available at -> 5 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:23:06 q? 16:23:06 q+ 16:23:36 w3c/sparql-query#143 16:23:37 https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/pull/143 -> Pull Request 143 RDF is a model, not a format (by TallTed) [spec:editorial] 16:23:44 andy: will handle editorial issue in line 4 16:23:47 ack pfps 16:24:12 peter: mobile phone fiasco doesn't disappear 16:24:21 q+ 16:24:58 ack niklasl 16:25:03 ... most of our documents currently have very bad user interface 16:25:04 q+ 16:25:11 ... proposal to do it right 16:25:31 niklasl: trurtle and trig not ready because of semantics issue 16:25:42 ... naming of annotations 16:25:53 s/trurtle/turtle 16:25:57 ack ktk 16:26:08 ... (not related to mobile phone issue) 16:27:01 ktk: we would have to go through different documents (the vast majority of them) 16:27:17 w3c/sparql-federated-query#17 16:27:18 https://github.com/w3c/sparql-federated-query/pull/17 -> Pull Request 17 again... model, not format (by TallTed) [spec:editorial] 16:27:27 peter: can we undo old commits that cause problems? 16:27:58 ktk: should we fix one document, and then follow through with all the others? 16:28:27 peter: that was the plan, with the semantics document, but we never had an agreement about the desired end state 16:28:38 ... and my proposal would be "no change" 16:28:44 TallTed has joined #rdf-star 16:28:52 ... which would mean revert all changes 16:29:36 ora: we need good user experience also on mobile devices 16:29:46 ... and we need consistency across all documents 16:30:04 ... but, how to do that is not clear to me 16:30:24 ... does that involve changes to what we had before? 16:31:05 peter: how to handle small view ports is a contentious issue 16:31:08 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/pull/30#issuecomment-1611284097 16:31:08 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/pull/30 -> Pull Request 30 improve display on mobile phones (by domel) [spec:editorial] 16:31:40 ktk: pchampin, can you (???) 16:31:57 pchampin: not sure how to assess what a good solution is 16:32:02 RRSAgent, pointer? 16:32:02 See https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-irc#T16-32-02 16:32:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:32:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:32:22 ... leaning towards reverting the changes, as peter suggests 16:32:42 ... dominique's changes (???) 16:32:54 i/RRSAgent, pointer?/present+ TallTed 16:32:55 ... CSS should be reverted to W3C standard 16:33:24 q? 16:33:29 ktk: pchampin and me will give it a try 16:33:32 q+ 16:33:41 ack TallTed 16:34:24 tallted: other groups probably have the same issues, maybe pchampin can gather some feedback from there 16:35:23 ora: let's revert, and then lets figure out who we need to go to to reach closer to perfection 16:35:31 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:35:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:38:13 q+ 16:38:45 q+ 16:38:47 Niklasl: added comment to PR mentioned in Dominik's mail from today 16:39:18 q+ to talk about sparql-federated-query PR 16:39:31 w3c/rdf-concepts#66 16:39:32 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/66 -> Pull Request 66 Updates rdf:JSON value space. (by gkellogg) [spec:substantive] 16:39:43 ktk: will get back to gregg and peter disagreeing on JSON value space 16:39:53 ack AndyS 16:39:53 AndyS, you wanted to talk about sparql-federated-query PR 16:39:55 The issue for rdf:JSON value space is that there needs to be an absolutely firm definintion of the value space and I don't see one now. 16:40:12 ack pfps 16:40:33 peter: can't see a definition of the value space 16:40:43 ... sorry, lexical space 16:41:28 ... lexical space is decimal and doesn't work with binary precision 16:42:09 ... text is defering to unspecified procedures 16:42:41 q+ 16:42:55 ack pchampin 16:43:03 https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/ 16:43:15 ... procedures not precisely defined 16:43:51 q+ 16:43:58 pchampin: this doc defines a transformation, maybe this could be brought in to help 16:44:04 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754-1985 16:44:26 ktk: is this something different? 16:45:17 also - https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#double (esp last para) 16:45:29 peter: this talks about some of the issues, but again doesn't say which decimal numbers should be used to represent a floating point number 16:46:09 andy: xml schema says something about that 16:46:32 ora: hates floating point numbers and suggests to get rid of them entirely 16:47:10 ktk: will try to work out a solution together with gregg and peter 16:47:51 peter: xml schema doesn't have a canonical representation for floating point 16:48:15 https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/datatypes.xml#float-canonical-representation 16:48:36 https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-31/ 16:48:48 https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/ 16:49:12 s/peter/pfps 16:49:58 https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#f-doubleCanmap 16:51:32 s/peter:/pfps:/g 16:52:13 pfps: will add comment to issue 16:52:21 ora: to be revisited 16:52:55 w3c/sparql-federated-query#17 16:52:56 https://github.com/w3c/sparql-federated-query/pull/17 -> Pull Request 17 again... model, not format (by TallTed) [spec:editorial] 16:54:35 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:54:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:55:14 present+ 16:55:16 present+ 16:55:22 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:55:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:55:30 Zakim, who's here? 16:55:30 Present: AndyS, tl, olaf, niklasl, pfps, eBremer, ora, fsasaki, doerthe, AZ, ktk, pchampin, gtw 16:55:30 On IRC I see TallTed, AZ, niklasl, ora, fsasaki, doerthe, olaf, eBremer, RRSAgent, Zakim, AndyS, pfps, tl, agendabot, ktk, Tpt, pchampin, driib5, gb, gtw, csarven, rhiaro, 16:55:30 ... AnthonySpencer, VladimirAlexiev, SintayewGashaw, Timothe, smoothsalt, joraboi445 16:56:13 Regrets+ Tpt 16:57:45 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:57:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk 16:58:14 olaf has left #rdf-star 16:59:01 heh 16:59:06 pchampin: can you add that to the issue? 16:59:55 that seems to contain quite some research 17:00:58 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/03/15-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:01:04 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/03/22-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:01:09 RRSAgent, make minutes 17:01:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/21-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 17:02:46 ah ok 17:02:59 RRSAgent, bye 17:02:59 I see no action items