Meeting minutes
Work Statement - Focus on Native Mobile vs. Mobile
JJ: We received feedback on the Work Statement from people outside our Task Force. We probably have to broaden our scope to include Web.
The Mobile Accessibility Mapping document (https://
We probably won't be able to publish tecniques for native mobile apps; remove bullet point (5) in the Work Statement
Contributing to the ACT Rules from native mobile app contexts might also be difficult - will have to set up meeting with the ACT TF.
We discussed how the MATF participants feel about broadening the scope. General consensus seems to be that it's OK, as long as our main focus remains to be native mobile apps.
Success Criteria mapping
JJ: We discussed what gaps exists in applying WCAG to (native) mobile. We also discussed how to write guidance. There is a need for clarification on Android, iOS that goes deeper than WCAG2ICT.
Investigate if/how we can link to external resources, such as code samples or techniques that are published outside the W3C domain.
It would be great to have step-by-step testing available to validate WCAG requirements
Collaboration with Google and Apple
Jamie Herrera mentioned that she will be at CSUN next week. Representatives from Apple and Google will be attending. She will try to talk to them and see if they are willing to contribute to the guidance we are creating.
At CSUN a company named Evinced will also present a set of guidelines for native mobile apps.