17:04:47 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 17:04:52 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-irc 17:04:52 Zakim has joined #rdf-star 17:04:52 all the present, scribe, etc., will need to repeat after the bots arrive 17:04:53 I've invited them 17:04:54 present+ 17:04:56 present+ 17:04:58 present+ 17:04:59 present+ 17:05:00 present+ 17:05:01 present+ 17:05:01 present+ 17:05:04 chair: ora 17:05:04 present+ 17:05:04 present+ 17:05:05 present+ 17:05:10 present+ 17:05:45 scribe olaf 17:05:49 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240222T120000/ 17:05:50 clear agenda 17:05:50 agenda+ Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: [1] 17:05:50 agenda+ Proposal for next week's discussion [2] 17:05:50 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at [3] 17:05:51 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at [4] 17:05:53 agenda+ Issue Triage, available at [5] 17:05:56 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 17:05:59 TallTed has changed the topic to: RDF Star WG - 2024-02-22 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240222T120000/ 17:06:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:06:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:06:19 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:06:47 last meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/02/16-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:06:48 ora: approval of minutes 17:06:49 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/02/23-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:07:10 ... first one is the one from Feb.8 17:07:14 https://www.w3.org/2024/02/08-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:07:21 ... any complaints? 17:07:39 present+ 17:07:49 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:07:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:07:59 ... No complaints! Approved! 17:08:14 ... The second one is the one from Feb.15 17:08:23 https://www.w3.org/2024/02/15-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:08:24 +1 for the minutes of the 8th Feb 17:09:26 scribe+ 17:09:38 i/approval of minutes/topic: Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: [1]/ 17:09:43 Zakim, skip item 1 17:09:43 agendum 1, Approval of minutes from the last two meetings:, skipped 17:10:11 +1 17:10:12 ora: No comments or worries about Feb.15 minutes, approved as well. 17:10:15 Zakim, open item 2 17:10:15 agendum 2 -- Proposal for next week's discussion -- taken up [from 2 via agendabot] 17:10:25 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:10:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:10:39 ora: Ideas for next week's discussion? 17:10:42 q+ 17:10:47 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 17:10:52 present+ 17:10:58 ack enrico 17:11:00 i/approval of minutes/scribe: olaf/ 17:11:07 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:11:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:11:14 enrico: I have new version of the semantics 17:11:18 ... minimalistic version for option 3 17:11:22 Semantics for option 3: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF%E2%80%90star-semantics:-option-3 17:11:32 ... we can discuss them tomorrow in the Sem TF meeting 17:11:39 q+ 17:11:46 ack olaf 17:11:53 scribe+ 17:12:30 q+ 17:12:30 olaf: RDF concepts PR - (1) what is the name of the predicate (2) triple term in object or object+subject 17:12:45 ack enrico 17:13:24 enrico: I have a basic version for the free version in my semantics doc 17:13:24 enrico - free RDF and best practice / well-formedness condition 17:13:40 scribe- 17:13:53 s/enrico - free/enrico: free/ 17:13:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:13:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:14:06 ora: we may also discuss naming in general (e.g., names for "triple term" and for "occurrence") 17:14:14 for this nameOf predicate, will we have a short hand like "a" for "rdf:type"? 17:14:31 AndyS: yes, we should sort out the naming sooner than later 17:14:55 ... It frees up frequent changes to the documents 17:15:13 ora: Additionally, we can/should do a little status check regarding editors 17:15:20 q+ 17:15:23 ... so that editors can actually do their work 17:15:25 ack AndyS 17:15:35 AndyS: I am good with that. 17:15:40 The shorthand is in the syntax (<< s p o >> => [] <<(s p o)>> and corresponding annotation form). 17:16:11 I meant => [] :nameOf <<(s p o)>> 17:16:12 ... for the SPARQL subgroup, we need to look into the issue of EXISTS 17:16:36 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 17:16:59 ora: We only pchampin's stuff as open actions 17:17:06 s/last meeting:/previous meeting:/ 17:17:10 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 17:17:12 ... since he is not here, skip to PRs 17:17:16 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:17:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:17:34 q+ 17:17:40 Zakim, next item 17:17:40 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, TallTed 17:17:58 scribe+ 17:18:05 Zakim, close item 3 17:18:05 agendum 3, Review of open actions, available at, closed 17:18:06 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:18:06 2. Proposal for next week's discussion [from 2 via agendabot] 17:18:06 olaf: 2 PR on SPARQL spec 17:18:14 Zakim, close item 2 17:18:14 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, TallTed 17:18:34 ... last week, after consensus, did a PR for RDf concepts for option 3. 17:18:36 q? 17:18:39 ack olaf 17:18:40 Zakim, close item 2 17:18:42 agendum 2, Proposal for next week's discussion, closed 17:18:42 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:18:42 4. Review of pull requests, available at [from 4 via agendabot] 17:18:43 ack olaf 17:18:52 ... discussion happening 17:18:58 Zakim, open item 4 17:18:58 agendum 4 -- Review of pull requests, available at -- taken up [from 4 via agendabot] 17:19:16 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:19:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:19:26 ... descriptive section on in this PR not done. Waiting for formal section to go in. 17:19:44 ... please look at https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/78 17:19:45 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/78 -> Pull Request 78 Proposal to adapt the abstract syntax to option 3 (by hartig) [spec:substantive] 17:19:57 scribe- 17:20:12 ora: What about the other PRs? 17:21:15 i|since he is not here|topic: Review of pull requests, available at https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4| 17:21:24 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:21:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:21:42 AndyS: These SPARQL PRs are on the test repo 17:22:01 gkellogg: these have approval and can be merged 17:22:03 s/agendum 4 -- Review of pull requests, available at -- taken up [from 4 via agendabot]// 17:22:17 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:22:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:22:29 ora: okay, seems we can merge them 17:22:40 gkellogg: yes, owners should merge them 17:23:12 ora: What about the JSON valuespace? 17:23:35 gkellogg: We decided to defer until we have sufficient intellectual bandwidth 17:23:45 Zakim, next item 17:23:45 agendum 5 -- Issue Triage, available at -- taken up [from 5] 17:23:49 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/5 17:23:49 ... they are not critical 17:24:31 AndyS: one of them reported from mailing lists 17:24:38 q+ 17:25:03 q- 17:25:14 olaf: I have made a PR for that one 17:25:59 AndyS: regarding "where are triple terms allowed" - for next week's discussion 17:26:27 ... formerly conflated with triple terms ? ;) 17:26:27 q+ if https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/79 should be in that table 17:26:28 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/79 -> Issue 79 Reconsider bidi tags? (by termontwouter) [wr:open] 17:26:44 q+ 17:27:24 q- 17:27:30 Found it! 17:27:41 ora: everyone, pick up issues from this list! 17:28:08 gkellogg: issue 63 is still waiting for some response from the i18n group 17:28:22 ora: I will ping Ellison (?) about that 17:28:44 AndyS: What is the status of ??code these days? 17:28:54 ora: I don't even know what that is. 17:29:09 s/??code/puny code 17:29:13 AndyS: It is a way to encode ... names. 17:29:22 wikipedia says "Punycode is a representation of Unicode with the limited ASCII character subset used for Internet hostnames. Using Punycode, host names containing Unicode characters are transcoded to a subset of ASCII consisting of letters, digits, and hyphens, which is called the letter–digit–hyphen (LDH) subset." 17:29:23 ... put seems to be used only in specs. 17:29:39 ... Seems time has moved on. 17:30:04 gkellogg: regarding issue 69, there was an external comment coming in. 17:30:15 q+ 17:30:16 ... but we already spent so much time on this 17:30:29 ... the comment rejects our proposal 17:30:52 s|issue 69|https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/79 | 17:30:57 ... Given that it is an external comment, it requires to be dealt with in some way. 17:31:17 ... Put the proposal is a matter of taste. 17:31:37 q+ 17:31:54 ... Maybe pchampin can take a look into this because he had some documents about it (with Ivan Herman) 17:32:10 ora: I will take a look into that one as well. 17:32:21 ack AndyS 17:32:49 ack niklasl 17:32:49 AndyS: His argument is fine but it starts from a different point. We start from a point where lang.tags already exist. 17:32:56 niklasl: I thought the same 17:33:17 ... interoperability for people comeing from different directions 17:33:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:33:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:34:13 ... we also had very comlex language codes in some earlier project 17:34:13 ... I have something that might help here 17:34:24 ... I would prefer explicit use cases and example that show why this is needed 17:34:35 ora: please dig a little deeper in this as well 17:34:40 niklasl: will do 17:34:50 s/in/into 17:34:59 s/comeing/coming/ 17:35:42 ora: my suggestion is that everyone takes a look at the issue list prior to meetings 17:36:02 ... to see whether there is something that you can pick up 17:36:10 s/comlex/complex/ 17:36:10 Zakim, next item 17:36:10 agendum 6 -- Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:36:14 ... now to 'other business' 17:36:35 ora: I have something, namely about the rechartering 17:36:43 ... getting an extension to our charter 17:37:06 ... pchampin had something about it but he wasn't in the recent chairs' meeting 17:37:08 s/puny code/punycode/ 17:37:21 ... nothing else anyone? 17:37:22 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:37:23 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:38:02 ... hope to see many of you tomorrow for the Semantics TF meeting 17:38:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:38:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:39:31 Zakim, end meeting 17:39:31 As of this point the attendees have been gtw, Souri, gkellogg, AndyS, ora, enrico, olaf, eBremer, AZ, niklasl, tl, TallTed, doerthe 17:39:31 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:39:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 17:39:37 I am happy to have been of service, TallTed; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 17:39:37 Zakim has left #rdf-star 17:39:37 RRSAgent, bye 17:39:37 I see no action items regrets+ ktk regrets+ pchampin regrets+ pfps