00:13:56 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 00:38:27 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 00:58:07 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 01:43:13 gb has joined #rdf-star 01:53:37 gb has joined #rdf-star 04:10:24 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 04:23:34 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 04:56:15 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 05:21:02 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 05:41:04 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 06:10:19 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 06:27:10 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 06:34:52 RRSAgent, leave 06:34:52 I see no action items 15:13:38 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:13:38 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/02/02-rdf-star-irc 15:13:40 Zakim has joined #rdf-star 15:13:50 present+ 15:14:28 present+ 15:14:41 present+ 15:14:44 present+ 15:14:55 present+ 15:14:58 present+ 15:15:02 meeting: RDF-star Semantics TF 15:15:24 chair: ora 15:15:30 present+ gkellogg 15:15:32 present+ 15:16:10 present+ pfps 15:16:20 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:16:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/02-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 15:16:26 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:17:04 q+ 15:17:11 pfps has joined #rdf-star 15:17:13 present+ 15:17:56 q+ 15:18:07 q+ 15:18:10 q- 15:19:19 ack pchampin 15:20:06 q+ 15:21:13 q+ 15:21:19 ack niklasl 15:21:40 q- 15:23:13 q+ 15:24:56 ack gkellogg 15:25:25 niklas: in proposal 1 just add some :e :partOf :g to "fake" a graph containement 15:26:00 q+ to ask about compliance levels 15:26:01 yes, I could go with that too if that's where we end up 15:26:35 +1 to gregg's point about working with existing RDF 1.1 systems 15:27:07 ack AndyS 15:28:41 q+ 15:29:04 q- 15:29:46 +1, it's too early to talk about optimization :-> 15:30:13 enrico has joined #rdf-star 15:30:15 present+ 15:30:23 q+ 15:30:30 +1, more about well-formedness / integrity perhaps? 15:30:30 ack pchampin 15:30:30 pchampin, you wanted to ask about compliance levels 15:33:05 ack tl 15:37:54 +1 for a very neutral name for what is currently rdfx:nameOf 15:38:18 q+ to talk about renaming reification vocabulary 15:40:11 double chevron == `<< >>` 15:40:15 properly, "double angle brackets" 15:40:22 q+ to ask about <<()>> in concrete syntaxes 15:40:25 ack AndyS 15:40:25 AndyS, you wanted to talk about renaming reification vocabulary 15:41:12 q+ 15:41:21 ack gkellogg 15:41:21 gkellogg, you wanted to ask about <<()>> in concrete syntaxes 15:42:47 q+ 15:42:50 ack pchampin 15:46:08 ack AndyS 15:46:08 q+ 15:47:13 A way to "control" sugar+: rdfx:triple rdfs:range [ owl:intersectionOf ( [ owl:onProperty rdf:subject ; owl:cardinality 1 ] [ owl:onProperty rdf:predicate ; owl:cardinality 1 ] [ owl:onProperty rdf:object ; owl:cardinality 1 ]) ] . 15:48:50 ack tl 15:53:43 i|meeting: RDF-star Semantics TF|topic: continuing discussion of https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.md| 15:53:48 q+ 15:54:08 ack TallTed 15:54:24 q+ 15:54:31 ack gkellogg 15:56:49 enrico has joined #rdf-star 15:58:33 hmmmm... the htmlpreview doesn't update when the html it previews is updated? https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.html 15:59:20 TallTed you might need to "strong-refresh" 15:59:39 q+ 16:00:05 q+ 16:00:06 q+ 16:01:11 q+ 16:03:02 ack niklasl 16:04:41 ack pchampin 16:04:41 q+ 16:04:53 well-formed-ness constraint: "the object of rdf:nameOf must have exactly one rdf:subject, one rdf:predicate, one rdf:object, and no two distinct nodes in the object of rdf:nameOf can have the same subject, predicate and object" 16:08:35 ack doerthe 16:10:28 ack AndyS 16:12:22 enrico has joined #rdf-star 16:12:28 present+ 16:12:37 q+ 16:14:39 ack gkellogg 16:14:59 thank you andy, I was really just curious 16:17:01 q+ 16:17:32 +1 to Gregg 16:17:57 ack enrico 16:20:09 :e1 rdf:nameOf <<( :s :p :o )>> . :e2 rdf:nameOf <<( :s :p :o )>> . matches :e1 rdf:nameOf ?Z . :e2 rdf:nameOf ?Z . -- one term in the object position, used twice. 16:21:02 + 1 AndyS 16:21:14 +1 to AndyS's example; that is what we need. 16:21:37 q+ 16:24:32 ack pchampin 16:25:52 q+ 16:28:04 ack AndyS 16:28:22 q- 16:29:03 ack enrico 16:29:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:29:45 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/02-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:30:53 I stand corrected, this goes beyond the problem of leanness 16:31:09 s|hmmmm... the htmlpreview doesn't update when the html it previews is updated? https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.html|| 16:31:09 s/TallTed you might need to "strong-refresh"// 16:31:21 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:31:23 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/02-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:32:52 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/02/01-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:33:09 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/02/08-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:33:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:33:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/02/02-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:40:20 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 16:44:53 gb has joined #rdf-star 16:50:09 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:23:37 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:23:57 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:29:09 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:43:33 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:19:24 TallTed has joined #rdf-star 18:25:26 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:56:06 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:29:44 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 20:28:25 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 20:43:38 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 20:55:24 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 20:58:06 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:19:01 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:54:23 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 22:11:22 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 22:50:11 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 23:14:29 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 23:31:24 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star