13:01:58 RRSAgent has joined #wot-discovery 13:02:02 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/01/15-wot-discovery-irc 13:02:18 McCool has joined #wot-discovery 13:02:22 ktoumura has joined #wot-discovery 13:02:25 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Kunihiko_Toumura 13:03:30 present+ Jan_Romann 13:03:48 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#11_December_2023 13:06:43 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 13:06:47 JKRhb has joined #wot-discovery 13:06:54 scribenick: JKRhb 13:07:00 topic: Minutes Review 13:07:14 mm: (Goes over the minutes of last time) 13:07:19 s|https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#11_December_2023|https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#15_January_2024| 13:07:20 ... did not see anything critical 13:07:34 i|Goes|-> https://www.w3.org/2023/12/11-wot-discovery-minutes.html Dec-11| 13:08:01 ... (summarizes the last meeting) 13:08:09 ... any objections to publishing? 13:08:19 ... hearing no objections, minutes are approved 13:08:30 topic: Logistics 13:08:49 mm: I'd like to archive all the old agendas in the Wiki, as they are taking up space 13:09:05 ... hearing no objections, will edit the Wiki and link them from the main page 13:09:12 subtopic: Meeting Schedule 13:09:29 mm: I don't have the time to be the TF lead of four taskforces 13:09:52 ... want to step down as TF lead of discovery and security 13:10:14 ... can ask the group if someone wants to take over the TF lead of one of them 13:10:42 ... if no one volunteers, I can continue as TF lead of either discovery or security 13:10:54 ... I also want to focus more on use cases in the future 13:11:31 ... I kind of want to pause our meetings until the end of January, to make space for the work on use cases 13:11:33 q+ 13:12:07 kaz: We can pause the work on security and discovery for a while based on the current state of the TFs 13:12:20 q- 13:12:22 ... but we should think about who should take the lead of these two TFs 13:12:39 mm: Yeah, we will need to go through process of electing new leads 13:12:45 ... need to define the policy here 13:13:13 ... should not pause the meetings undefinitely but define a concrete date when we are going to resume 13:13:25 ... we could, for example, resume on February 19 13:13:34 ... that would give us a month to work on use cases 13:13:39 ... does that make sense? 13:13:44 kaz: Yeah 13:13:55 mm: Let me add that to the agenda to remind myself 13:14:04 ... (edits the agenda in the wiki) 13:14:21 topic: Resources 13:14:29 subtopic: HTML for ontology 13:14:36 mm: There is a PR 13:14:46 https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/535 13:15:03 ... this is related to issue 533 13:15:04 https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/533 13:15:20 ... there are two things 13:15:53 ... setting up the scripts and rendering the ontology and then pushing it to wot-resources 13:16:46 jr: (describes the PR 535) 13:18:07 ... actual logic is written in "renderOntology.js" 13:18:55 ... something is missing at the moment 13:19:06 i/desc/scribenick: kaz/ 13:21:24 ... asking Farshid and @@@ for review but have not got response yet 13:21:36 mm: where the DID description come from? 13:21:43 q+ 13:21:58 jr: you can look into the diff 13:22:31 mm: so you're modifying the TTL file (discovery-ontology.ttl) 13:22:49 ... do we update it on site? or add any versions? 13:23:23 ... these are almost annotations 13:23:25 jr: yes 13:23:52 mm: defined the prefix 13:23:54 jr: yes 13:24:26 mm: default prefix to be described as ":" 13:24:30 jr: rith 13:24:36 s/rith/right/ 13:24:56 mm: modifying the content in the root directory 13:25:11 ... not "publication" 13:25:57 ... we need to update the resources until the they're completely fixed 13:26:08 ... shouldn't break any things 13:26:21 ... doesn't change any existing names 13:26:53 ... good opportunity for us all as the WG to think about how to manage the changes 13:27:10 ... guess we could do this right now 13:27:24 ... because this is updating the resources in-place 13:27:43 ... but one question is how to identify the versions 13:27:45 q+ 13:27:58 jr: should go to the TTL file? 13:28:16 mm: we have the status of the document 13:29:09 ... where did the status information come from? 13:30:53 jr: should the information go to the status section? 13:31:00 ... or some dedicated appendix section? 13:31:50 ... maybe link to the change log description at appendix 13:32:13 mm: suggestion is 13:32:25 ... Version 1.0.1 13:32:51 ... See [[ChangeLog]] 13:35:26 ... then description at the Change Log section within appendix 13:35:48 i/then/... within the Status section/ 13:38:35 q? 13:39:59 s/@@@/Andrea/ 13:40:45 ack k 13:41:37 kaz: TD TF is also discussing how to manage the changes using the version numbers 13:41:55 ... so should have joint discussion about version management with the TD TF too 13:42:23 ... McCool, do you think you can join the TD call at some point, Wed or Thu? 13:42:32 mm: have conflicts this week 13:42:39 ... maybe next week 13:42:49 ... meanwhile let's not merge this PR itself 13:42:53 ack k 13:43:10 s/Andrea/Andrea and Mahda/ 13:43:24 rrsagent, make log public 13:43:28 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:43:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/01/15-wot-discovery-minutes.html kaz 13:44:48 mm: how to proceed? 13:45:04 ... is there an Issue on the wot-thing-description repo already? 13:45:28 kaz: you can create an issue on wot-discovery side mentioning Ege's name :) 13:45:42 mm: seems there is an issue on wot repo 13:46:42 s/repo/repo about spec versions/ 13:47:07 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/1082 wot Issue 1082 - Versioning Discussion 13:47:18 scribenick: JKRhb 13:47:28 i/scribe/mm: (creates another issue around ontology versions)/ 13:47:37 rrsagetn, draft minutes 13:49:12 mm: I think we need a common way to manage resources 13:49:22 ... this is just a description, not a natural policy 13:49:35 ... but we can create one and then discuss it, linking back to this issue 13:49:42 ... does that make sense? 13:49:48 kaz: Yeah, is a good starting point 13:50:02 mm: The discovery thing can serve as a good example 13:50:57 ... can you continue working on the PR, Jan? 13:51:14 ... we can merge now and then fix the remaining issues later 13:51:23 jr: Yeah, applied some minor fixes 13:51:35 mm: We can merge now, then apply additional fixes to .ttl file 13:51:39 ... any objections to merging? 13:51:54 ... no objections, merging, then we can open an issue for the remaining issues 13:52:04 PR is merged 13:52:36 mm: (adjusts issue 533, adding another checkbox for updating the remaining TODO comments) 13:53:07 ... I think what that means is that we have the first one checked 13:53:13 ... (ticks the checkbox) 13:53:24 i|adjust|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/533 Issue 533 - Update HTML for Discovery ontology| 13:53:25 ... third one is partially done 13:53:29 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:53:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/01/15-wot-discovery-minutes.html kaz 13:54:07 ... (adds another ticked checkbox regarding the generation of an interim HTML output with TODOs) 13:54:40 ... after this interim step, we can make another PR in the discovery repo and then make a another PR in the wot-resources repository 13:55:00 topic: DID Registry 13:55:14 mm: Haven't looked into this PR in a while 13:55:22 ... so I asked for review 13:55:35 ... has been reviewed, they did some language tweaks 13:55:59 i|Haven't|-> https://github.com/w3c/did-spec-registries/pull/486 did-spec-registries PR 486 - Add WotThing and WotDirectory service types| 13:56:44 ... (reads through one suggestion) 13:57:04 ... this suggestion regarding "either" does not make sense to me 13:57:51 ... I will commit these changes and then make some minor tweaks (e.g., adding a comma) to get us past the review 13:58:28 ... (looks at the resulting PR diff, adds another suggestion regarding the comma) 13:58:34 ... (commits it) 13:59:17 ... so let's resolve the conversation 13:59:46 ... (adds a comment saying the suggested changes have been accepted with a minor tweak for clarity) 14:00:22 ... (adds another comment asking for a final review) 14:00:47 .... let's leave it for now and I will at it again in a while 14:01:03 topic: Use Case 14:01:08 mahda-noura has joined #wot-discovery 14:01:13 s/Case/Case Call/ 14:01:29 mm: Anything else? When is the use case call again 14:01:45 kaz: On Wednesday before the main call 14:02:08 mm: Let's continue the discussion there 14:02:13 [adjourned] 14:02:30 s/call/call. I'll allocate a Zoom, and then distribute it to the groups./ 14:02:41 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:02:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/01/15-wot-discovery-minutes.html kaz 14:02:57 McCool has left #wot-discovery 14:13:23 chair: McCool 14:13:24 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:13:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/01/15-wot-discovery-minutes.html kaz 16:08:31 Zakim has left #wot-discovery