13:49:08 RRSAgent has joined #pmwg 13:49:12 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/01/05-pmwg-irc 13:49:12 RRSAgent, make logs Public 13:49:13 Meeting: Publishing Maintenance Working Group 13:49:18 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2024-01-05: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pm-wg/2024Jan/0000.html 13:49:19 Chair: wendy 13:49:19 Date: 2024-01-05 13:49:19 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pm-wg/2024Jan/0000.html 13:49:20 Meeting: Publishing Maintenance Working Group Telco 13:50:31 dhall has joined #pmwg 13:51:51 wendyreid has joined #pmwg 13:56:36 present+ 13:56:41 present+ george 13:56:53 present+ 13:57:35 George has joined #pmwg 13:59:35 tzviya has joined #pmwg 13:59:57 shiestyle has joined #pmwg 13:59:59 toshiakikoike has joined #pmwg 14:00:17 present+ 14:00:22 present+ 14:00:25 gautierchomel has joined #pmwg 14:00:45 present+ gautierchomel 14:00:52 present+ brady 14:00:54 AvneeshSingh has joined #pmwg 14:01:02 present+ avneesh 14:01:02 present+ 14:01:06 present+ 14:01:30 present+ 14:01:39 duga has joined #pmwg 14:01:52 scribe+ gautierchomel 14:01:54 scribe+ 14:02:14 present+ shiestyle 14:02:25 present+ 14:03:48 https://github.com/w3c/tdm-reservation-protocol/issues/33 14:03:53 https://w3c.github.io/tdm-reservation-protocol/spec/tdmrep-epub.html#sec-epub 14:04:26 shiestyle has joined #pmwg 14:05:01 wendyreid: there's a proposal to have tdm in EPUB files. 14:05:05 guest+ James_Yanchak 14:07:08 James_Yanchak: tdm working group has covered many formats, EPUB is the final primory format to deal with. Do we do it a book level, file level? File level is easy as it's HTML, book levl would be more accurate, but it's adding a namespace in the OPF. 14:08:06 q+ to ask if this for rdm or ai or both 14:08:20 ack tzviya 14:08:20 tzviya, you wanted to ask if this for rdm or ai or both 14:08:57 This is how it would look side on the HTML side: 14:09:00 1 14:09:00 https://provider.com/policies/policy.json 14:09:04 tzviya: what's he urgency? 14:09:51 leonardr has joined #pmwg 14:10:04 present+ leonardr 14:10:16 q+ 14:10:23 q+ 14:10:53 James_Yanchak: it's related to the EU directive. More and more complains appears about files used for AI training. So it's important now. 14:10:58 present+ leonardr 14:11:19 ack duga 14:12:03 duga: lot of different groups are working of the subject, what are the interactions? 14:13:13 James_Yanchak: I would say we are focusing about publishing in the EU, I hope the other groups will follow us when it comes to EPUB. 14:13:16 q+ 14:13:45 ack leonardr 14:14:34 q+ to ask if reading systems will support this 14:14:42 James_Yanchak: the main question, is about can we add a namespace? It causes EPUBs to be invalids. Original TDM is adding a namespace. But we can have a Prefix without adding a namespace (like DC:. 14:15:00 q+ 14:18:56 leonardr: I represent C2PA wich also work on the subject. C2PA supports EPUB. Regarding others industries (images, videos, audios), are not going the way to add something to the file. Also to know, many countries are working on legislations, the paysage is changing. 14:19:00 ack ivan 14:19:44 EPUB support in C2PA - https://c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/1.4/specs/C2PA_Specification.html#_embedding_manifests_into_zip_based_formats 14:20:13 ivan: back to the original question, prefix mecanism on the package document is easy because we have nothing to do. The question is do we need to add something to spec but it's not urgent. 14:20:13 ack tzviya 14:20:13 tzviya, you wanted to ask if reading systems will support this 14:20:44 MasakazuKitahara has joined #pmwg 14:20:47 q+ 14:21:36 tzviya: the question is would RS support one or another method. What will happen at the RS level? Can they process this information? 14:21:37 ack wendyreid 14:21:41 q+ 14:23:40 q+ 14:23:47 wendyreid: reatilers and distributors will be looking at this information. OPF level looks the easier method to process this information. On the retail side, contracts are also playing a role, we won't do anything without a previous discussion with publishers. 14:23:48 ack ivan 14:23:49 q- 14:23:53 q+ 14:24:44 ivan: in the standards we do not define what RS may should or must do with the metadatas. So we don't have to change anything in the standard. 14:25:18 ack dhall 14:25:21 ivan: if you choose the HTML level, you have to also consider media resosurces. 14:26:10 q= 14:26:13 q+ 14:26:16 s/resosurces/resources/ 14:27:27 q+ 14:27:41 dhall: there could be implications for what RS are allowed to do with the content. Specifically we may have to prevent usages depending on the specification of the restriction. 14:27:44 q+ 14:27:45 ack duga 14:29:25 q+ 14:29:29 duga: we don't have any control of what the TDM group doesthis sounds like managing digital rights. It sounds like DRM to me. 14:29:42 ack leonardr 14:31:40 JamesY has joined #pmwg 14:31:47 leonardr: the line is fine, true. part of the issue is we are not speaking about copy rights. We are responding to legislations, trying to technicaly solve a legislative process. Still it's usage restriction. 14:31:51 present+ 14:32:19 duga: we don't do DRM in the manifest, can we do TDM reservation? 14:32:25 ack wendyreid 14:32:34 q- 14:34:06 q+ 14:34:52 wendyreid: EPUB ecosystem is not only the file, we also have ONIX associated metadata. When we get to the content, that's where EPUB should be able to reflect the publisher request negociated in the contracts. 14:34:56 ack ivan 14:36:26 ivan: prefix respects the charter. We only acknowledge that another group does something which is doable in EPUB. 14:36:45 ack duga 14:37:55 q+ to respond to brady about tdm in package 14:38:16 duga: looking at the third choice, maybe we can just say don't do anything to the manifest. 14:39:51 duga: contracts and agrements with publishers don't allow you to break the law. the TDM implementation is over publishers arangements because it's legal. 14:39:58 ack tzviya 14:39:58 tzviya, you wanted to respond to brady about tdm in package 14:40:18 q+ 14:40:36 q+ 14:40:57 tzviya: it's important to meet with others people working on TDM. Maybe schedule a joint meeting. 14:41:48 tzviya: there may be a strong interest from publishers to have TDM not separated. 14:41:51 ack leonardr 14:43:15 leonardr: C2PA does not modify the structure. 14:44:36 q+ 14:44:42 leonardr: C2PA or TDM don't adress translation. There's a clear technical difference between translation or recomandation algorithms and training an AI. 14:44:49 ack wendyreid 14:46:03 ack George 14:46:43 q+ 14:46:48 q+ 14:47:20 George: some possible accessibility implications. Cognitive disability may request a simplified version of the text than can be offered by an AI. A blind person may want a more accurate description generated by AI. 14:47:27 ack ivan 14:48:57 ivan: parts of our discussions are relevant to the TDM group. Our focus should be how we answer the TDM communtity. 14:49:14 ack wendyreid 14:50:39 q+ 14:51:09 ack ivan 14:51:10 wendyreid: to respond the TDM group we need to talk with them. In the current state we don't have nothing to do but we may want to add a note to the EPUB spec. 14:51:44 q+ 14:51:47 q+ 14:52:38 ivan: we don't take side about the best protocol, we are only responding to the question of the TDM group. Is it ok for us to have something added to the manifest or no? 14:52:55 ack leonardr 14:53:10 q+ to suggest that we meet on TDM time 14:53:40 ack wendyreid 14:53:57 q+ 14:54:19 leonardr: I agree with the group remaining agnostic to technical solutions. 14:54:42 q+ 14:54:52 ack tzviya 14:54:52 tzviya, you wanted to suggest that we meet on TDM time 14:55:29 tzviya: as we have questions and concerns about how solutions will be implemented we should discuss with the TDM group 14:55:36 ack duga 14:56:26 duga: it looks like we see no problem with the prefix approach proposed by the TDM group 14:56:58 ack AvneeshSingh 14:57:00 ivan: my proposal is to say the TDM group yes, it works. 14:57:42 s/as we have questions and concerns about how solutions will be implemented we should discuss with the TDM group/ as we have questions and concerns about how solutions will be implemented we should discuss with the TDM group in one of their meetings 14:57:54 AvneeshSingh: maybe the Community Group will want to adress the side discussions. 14:59:41 wendyreid: we'll discuss with the TDM group to point our concerns and comment that the proposition is doable. 15:00:06 wendyreid: there's no blocker. 15:00:32 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:00:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/01/05-pmwg-minutes.html ivan