Meeting minutes
Drug ID ontology
DBooth: Will follow up with Heiner about scheduling this
Turtle examples
tim: Sent PR and mentioned it zulip.
eric: That will allow us to test shex better.
ACTION: tim to ping grahame on zulip
tim: the other changes i have add things that make it easier to gen all the exapmles without genning the entire FHIR spec.
tim: "I made some progress towards adding extra unit tests for generating examples tmprd/
eric: Could put them on github so I can grab them.
… I'll give you permission to put in in fhircat repo
http://
dbooth: Will these changes fix all known issues in the Turtle examples?
tim: Fixes missing datatype annotations, duplication of root properties. I loaded a lot of these w protege and it told me a lot were not correct. Also there was an issue w URLs having bad chars.
… Some have a vertical bar in them.
tim: Current fixes lined up HL7/
… w3c/
eric: Does FHIR protocal accept accepts the percent-encoded vertical bar in a request?
rob; Depends on how the operation is defined.
… If' it's looking for a URI you have to strip it out.
eric: canonical: http://
encoded: http://
REST API: http://
ACTION: Eric to follow up on the zulip thread
Imaging metadata
erich: Also similar to features pulled from deep learning pipelines. How far does FHIR go to having vocab to describe them?
… Geo groups say it doesn't need to be limited to geo.
… Dicom has a lot of vocab for radiology images, and now has pathol vocab. Recently added annotation capabilities. But there's no official RDF casting to it.
… Which group handles this, and how do i connect it to FHIR RDF data?
rob: in RDF, no clear answer. Between imaging WG and FHIR infra and this group, we'll need to figure it out. Not sure anybody's explored it.
erich: Can do demo in a few weeks.
tim: Have you seen the imaging study resource, and how it connects to DICOM?
erich: Not yet.
https://
erich: Some casting from DICOM to RDF have been done, but nothing official. Seems like an opportunity.
dbooth: identified others with similar interest?
erich: OMOP group is interested, but again no official RDF casting.
eric: Where do you want to go?
erich: Based on problems I need to solve.
… Want to base it on standard where possible.
eric: if you ask how to connect to external resources, the FHIR folks will say "let's make FHIR resources for it"
… There's bound to be a boundary on that. Better to have DICOM on the inside or the outside of that boundary?
eric: There will be a swat4ls conference in a couple months. Scott Marshall will be there. Maybe get together there? Maybe push the DICOM people to annoint?
eric: Seems like we need an annointed DICOM RDF
ACTION: EricP to ping Scott Marshall about DICOM RDF
tim: Laterality refers to DICOM. Maybe make an extension of the ImagingStudy resource?
eric: If we already know how to connect the two ontologies, then in theory we can do what we need. FHIR Extensions are not very friendly to RDF use.
ADJOURNED