IRC log of wot-script on 2023-11-20
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:03:13 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wot-script
- 12:03:18 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-irc
- 12:03:18 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #wot-script
- 12:03:27 [Mizushima]
- Mizushima has joined #wot-script
- 12:06:41 [JKRhb]
- JKRhb has joined #wot-script
- 12:07:18 [kaz]
- meeting: WoT Scripting API
- 12:07:37 [kaz]
- present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Jan_Romann, Tomoaki_Mizushima
- 12:10:22 [cris__]
- cris__ has joined #wot-script
- 12:10:59 [cris__]
- topic: minutes
- 12:11:04 [cris__]
- dape: looks fine
- 12:11:15 [dape]
- --> Nov 11 -> https://www.w3.org/2023/11/06-wot-script-minutes.html
- 12:11:22 [cris__]
- ... we merged
- 12:11:28 [cris__]
- ... PRs and issues
- 12:11:38 [kaz]
- q+
- 12:11:43 [cris__]
- ... ok we can approved them
- 12:11:53 [cris__]
- s/issues/look issues/
- 12:12:07 [kaz]
- s/11/6/
- 12:12:10 [dape]
- s/Nov 11/Nov 6
- 12:12:25 [kaz]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 12:12:30 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:12:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:12:39 [cris__]
- topic: Next calls
- 12:13:00 [cris__]
- dape: first of all, xmas is near. We should decide if there will be cancellations
- 12:13:09 [kaz]
- i/Next calls/(approved)/
- 12:13:21 [kaz]
- i/looks fine/scribenick: cris__/
- 12:13:23 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:13:24 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:13:30 [cris__]
- ... it seems that in other calls they already cancelled calls.
- 12:14:09 [cris__]
- ... is the plan ok
- 12:14:18 [cris__]
- s/ok/ok?/
- 12:14:38 [cris__]
- ... no call the 25th of december and first of January
- 12:14:44 [cris__]
- ... let us know if you don't agree
- 12:15:07 [cris__]
- subtopic: 2 weeks slot call?
- 12:15:15 [cris__]
- dape: 2 calls in a month?
- 12:15:24 [cris__]
- q+
- 12:15:28 [kaz]
- q-
- 12:15:32 [JKRhb]
- q+
- 12:16:23 [cris__]
- cris: 2 weeks slot make sense. We don't have that much topics to discuss
- 12:16:44 [cris__]
- dape: agree
- 12:16:48 [dape]
- ack cris__
- 12:17:07 [cris__]
- jan: second that, we are corrently working mostly async anyway. We can still merge PR once every two weeks
- 12:17:17 [cris__]
- ... we can also always switch back
- 12:18:01 [cris__]
- dape: suggestion keep weekly slot but use the wiki to cancel it
- 12:20:07 [dape]
- PROPOSAL: For the near future the Scripting task force is going to have a 2-week schedule. Ahead of time it will be made public the when the next call will take place. W3C calendar entries remain as is for now.
- 12:20:12 [Mizushima]
- q+
- 12:20:26 [cris__]
- +1
- 12:20:30 [kaz]
- q+
- 12:20:33 [kaz]
- ack jk
- 12:20:36 [dape]
- ack JKRhb
- 12:21:13 [kaz]
- ack mi
- 12:21:49 [kaz]
- chair: Daniel
- 12:22:24 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:22:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:23:01 [kaz]
- present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi, Zoltan_Kis
- 12:23:01 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:23:02 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:25:14 [cris__]
- q+
- 12:25:19 [kaz]
- ack k
- 12:28:41 [kaz]
- ack c
- 12:28:42 [cris__]
- ack c
- 12:29:07 [cris__]
- dape: changing to intention. Meanwhile we discuss the plan
- 12:29:19 [cris__]
- let's see if we can came up with a plan
- 12:29:22 [kaz]
- q+
- 12:29:41 [cris__]
- ... and cancel the next call if needed
- 12:30:16 [cris__]
- kaz: if you have a clear time span when you want to have a bi-weekly call you should say it in the text
- 12:30:22 [cris__]
- ... near future is vague
- 12:30:34 [kaz]
- ack k
- 12:30:34 [dape]
- INTENTION: For a while the the Scripting API task force might want to have a bi-weekly schedule. Meeting cancellations will be made official ahead of time. W3C calendar entries remain as is for now.
- 12:31:21 [cris__]
- topic: PRs
- 12:31:25 [cris__]
- dape: no updates
- 12:31:52 [cris__]
- ... one about improvements, we are stuck and we need time to look into it
- 12:32:00 [kaz]
- s/near future is vague/"near future" is vague. also if your intention is actually "for a while until the work on TD 2.0 and Discovery 1.1 starts", you should say so./
- 12:32:11 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:32:12 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:32:18 [kaz]
- q?
- 12:32:18 [cris__]
- ... the next twos are about discovery
- 12:32:19 [cris__]
- ... and how to align
- 12:32:51 [cris__]
- subtopic: PR 513
- 12:33:53 [kaz]
- -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/513 PR 513 - feat!(typescript): align TypeScript definitions with Discovery API
- 12:35:31 [cris_]
- cris_ has joined #wot-script
- 12:35:39 [cris_]
- cris: looks good to me
- 12:36:03 [dape_]
- dape_ has joined #wot-script
- 12:36:13 [cris_]
- dape: merging PR
- 12:36:25 [kaz2]
- kaz2 has joined #wot-script
- 12:36:51 [cris_]
- scribenick: cris_
- 12:37:11 [cris_]
- dape: we can now start working with node-wot
- 12:37:20 [cris_]
- jan: it was a blocker, great to merge
- 12:37:41 [cris_]
- dape: thank you jan
- 12:38:06 [cris_]
- subtopic: PR 517
- 12:38:20 [cris_]
- dape: we are using constructors in the webIDL
- 12:38:34 [cris_]
- ... it wasn't in the TS definitions
- 12:38:46 [cris_]
- ... it is not what we intended
- 12:39:02 [cris_]
- ... we should also use the term creating instead of contracting
- 12:39:20 [cris_]
- zoltan: do we have the expose method still ?
- 12:39:24 [cris_]
- dape: yes
- 12:39:24 [kaz]
- i|we are|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/517 PR 517 - feat!: remove constructor from ConsumedThing interface|
- 12:39:39 [kaz]
- q+
- 12:39:43 [cris_]
- q+
- 12:39:54 [cris_]
- zoltan: consistent deciding
- 12:39:55 [kaz]
- s/contract/construct/
- 12:40:15 [cris_]
- ... it is a complication and it is misunderstanding
- 12:41:04 [cris_]
- dape: it was there for hystorical reasons
- 12:41:42 [cris_]
- q?
- 12:41:52 [cris_]
- zoltan: ok to merge
- 12:43:04 [cris_]
- kaz: what is the intention? given the current sample code we can remove the constructor code but the text can still say construct
- 12:44:00 [cris_]
- dape: we don't change anything else, but just align the text
- 12:44:33 [cris_]
- kaz: it sounds ok, who and when the object it self is created?
- 12:45:18 [cris_]
- ... was it a bug?
- 12:45:26 [cris_]
- dape: it was a leftover from old days
- 12:45:39 [cris_]
- ... it was also in ExposeThing
- 12:49:08 [cris_]
- cris: two comments. It is true that creates confusion. In the CG we got feedback about how it was not clear the process to create a ConsumedThing. Second I recall that the constructor was there for facilitating testing, still we can remove it
- 12:49:18 [cris_]
- dape: ok, merging
- 12:49:30 [cris_]
- subtopic: PR #512
- 12:49:52 [cris_]
- dape: kaz created a script to handle duplicated ids created by a bug in respect
- 12:49:53 [kaz]
- s/PR/Issue/
- 12:50:21 [kaz]
- i|kaz cre|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/512 Issue 512 - Add perl script (for fixing duplicate IDs) to master/release folder
- 12:50:37 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:50:38 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:50:47 [cris_]
- dape: added also readme
- 12:50:49 [cris_]
- q+
- 12:50:58 [kaz]
- i/Issue #512/PR #518 and Issue #512/
- 12:51:00 [kaz]
- q-
- 12:51:06 [cris_]
- ack c
- 12:51:38 [cris_]
- ... similar to what other repos have
- 12:51:44 [cris_]
- ... is that ok to merge it?
- 12:52:08 [kaz]
- q+
- 12:52:22 [cris_]
- zoltan: ok
- 12:52:30 [kaz]
- ack k
- 12:52:30 [cris_]
- kaz: ok too, thank you
- 12:52:33 [cris_]
- jan: ok too
- 12:52:55 [kaz]
- s/ok too,/ok too. if needed, we can modify the description later./
- 12:53:01 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:53:02 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:53:23 [Mizushima]
- +1 me too
- 12:53:37 [kaz]
- i|Issue 512 -|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/518 PR 518 - refactor: add readme and perl script for publication/release|
- 12:53:42 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:53:43 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:54:10 [cris_]
- jan: should we add a followup issue?
- 12:54:21 [cris_]
- cris: I little bit overkill but that's ok
- 12:54:23 [kaz]
- s/Issue #512/PR #518 and Issue #512/
- 12:54:24 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:54:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:54:45 [cris_]
- dape: it already there
- 12:54:57 [kaz]
- s/I little bit/a little bit/
- 12:54:59 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:55:00 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 12:55:06 [cris_]
- ... Issue 480
- 12:56:05 [cris_]
- subtopic: PR 489
- 12:56:23 [cris_]
- dape: cristiano worked on better typings
- 12:56:32 [cris_]
- ... there were problems
- 12:58:05 [kaz]
- i|cristiano worked|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/489 PR 489 - Better types for Scripting API|
- 12:58:08 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 12:58:09 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 13:00:08 [cris_]
- cris: there are tricky parts
- 13:00:26 [cris_]
- zoltan: we should take care to not make more restrictions
- 13:00:36 [cris_]
- ... than the one are in the algorithms
- 13:02:15 [JKRhb]
- I will also have another look into it :) I hadn't had found a solution for the problem so far as well :/
- 13:03:02 [JKRhb]
- s/had//
- 13:03:24 [kaz]
- [adjourned]
- 13:03:26 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 13:03:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
- 13:58:37 [mahda-noura]
- mahda-noura has joined #wot-script
- 15:27:54 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wot-script