12:03:13 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-script
12:03:18 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-irc
12:03:18 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #wot-script
12:03:27 <Mizushima> Mizushima has joined #wot-script
12:06:41 <JKRhb> JKRhb has joined #wot-script
12:07:18 <kaz> meeting: WoT Scripting API
12:07:37 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Jan_Romann, Tomoaki_Mizushima
12:10:22 <cris__> cris__ has joined #wot-script
12:10:59 <cris__> topic: minutes
12:11:04 <cris__> dape: looks fine
12:11:15 <dape> --> Nov 11 -> https://www.w3.org/2023/11/06-wot-script-minutes.html
12:11:22 <cris__> ... we merged
12:11:28 <cris__> ... PRs and issues
12:11:38 <kaz> q+
12:11:43 <cris__> ... ok we can approved them
12:11:53 <cris__> s/issues/look issues/
12:12:07 <kaz> s/11/6/
12:12:10 <dape> s/Nov 11/Nov 6
12:12:25 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
12:12:30 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:12:32 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:12:39 <cris__> topic: Next calls
12:13:00 <cris__> dape: first of all, xmas is near. We should decide if there will be cancellations
12:13:09 <kaz> i/Next calls/(approved)/
12:13:21 <kaz> i/looks fine/scribenick: cris__/
12:13:23 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:13:24 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:13:30 <cris__> ... it seems that in other calls they already cancelled calls.
12:14:09 <cris__> ... is the plan ok
12:14:18 <cris__> s/ok/ok?/
12:14:38 <cris__> ... no call the 25th of december and first of January
12:14:44 <cris__> ... let us know if you don't agree
12:15:07 <cris__> subtopic: 2 weeks slot call?
12:15:15 <cris__> dape: 2 calls in a month?
12:15:24 <cris__> q+
12:15:28 <kaz> q-
12:15:32 <JKRhb> q+
12:16:23 <cris__> cris: 2 weeks slot make sense. We don't have that much topics to discuss
12:16:44 <cris__> dape: agree
12:16:48 <dape> ack cris__
12:17:07 <cris__> jan: second that, we are corrently working mostly async anyway. We can still merge PR once every two weeks
12:17:17 <cris__> ... we can also always switch back
12:18:01 <cris__> dape: suggestion keep weekly slot but use the wiki to cancel it
12:20:07 <dape> PROPOSAL: For the near future the Scripting task force is going to have a 2-week schedule. Ahead of time it will be made public the when the next call will take place. W3C calendar entries remain as is for now.
12:20:12 <Mizushima> q+
12:20:26 <cris__> +1
12:20:30 <kaz> q+
12:20:33 <kaz> ack jk
12:20:36 <dape> ack JKRhb
12:21:13 <kaz> ack mi
12:21:49 <kaz> chair: Daniel
12:22:24 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:22:25 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:23:01 <kaz> present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi, Zoltan_Kis
12:23:01 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:23:02 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:25:14 <cris__> q+
12:25:19 <kaz> ack k
12:28:41 <kaz> ack c
12:28:42 <cris__> ack c
12:29:07 <cris__> dape: changing to intention. Meanwhile we discuss the plan
12:29:19 <cris__> let's see if we can came up with a plan
12:29:22 <kaz> q+
12:29:41 <cris__> ... and cancel the next call if needed
12:30:16 <cris__> kaz: if you have a clear time span when you want to have a bi-weekly call you should say it in the text
12:30:22 <cris__> ... near future is vague
12:30:34 <kaz> ack k
12:30:34 <dape> INTENTION: For a while the the Scripting API task force might want to have a bi-weekly schedule. Meeting cancellations will be made official ahead of time. W3C calendar entries remain as is for now.
12:31:21 <cris__> topic: PRs
12:31:25 <cris__> dape: no updates
12:31:52 <cris__> ... one about improvements, we are stuck and we need time to look into it
12:32:00 <kaz> s/near future is vague/"near future" is vague. also if your intention is actually "for a while until the work on TD 2.0 and Discovery 1.1 starts", you should say so./
12:32:11 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:32:12 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:32:18 <kaz> q?
12:32:18 <cris__> ... the next twos are about discovery
12:32:19 <cris__> ... and how to align
12:32:51 <cris__> subtopic: PR 513
12:33:53 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/513 PR 513 - feat!(typescript): align TypeScript definitions with Discovery API
12:35:31 <cris_> cris_ has joined #wot-script
12:35:39 <cris_> cris: looks good to me
12:36:03 <dape_> dape_ has joined #wot-script
12:36:13 <cris_> dape: merging PR
12:36:25 <kaz2> kaz2 has joined #wot-script
12:36:51 <cris_> scribenick: cris_
12:37:11 <cris_> dape: we can now start working with node-wot
12:37:20 <cris_> jan: it was a blocker, great to merge
12:37:41 <cris_> dape: thank you jan
12:38:06 <cris_> subtopic: PR 517
12:38:20 <cris_> dape: we are using constructors in the webIDL
12:38:34 <cris_> ... it wasn't in the TS definitions
12:38:46 <cris_> ... it is not what we intended
12:39:02 <cris_> ... we should also use the term creating instead of contracting
12:39:20 <cris_> zoltan: do we have the expose method still ?
12:39:24 <cris_> dape: yes
12:39:24 <kaz> i|we are|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/517 PR 517 - feat!: remove constructor from ConsumedThing interface|
12:39:39 <kaz> q+
12:39:43 <cris_> q+
12:39:54 <cris_> zoltan: consistent deciding
12:39:55 <kaz> s/contract/construct/
12:40:15 <cris_> ... it is a complication and it is misunderstanding
12:41:04 <cris_> dape: it was there for hystorical reasons
12:41:42 <cris_> q?
12:41:52 <cris_> zoltan: ok to merge
12:43:04 <cris_> kaz: what is the intention? given the current sample code we can remove the constructor code but the text can still say construct
12:44:00 <cris_> dape: we don't change anything else, but just align the text
12:44:33 <cris_> kaz: it sounds ok, who and when the object it self is created?
12:45:18 <cris_> ... was it a bug?
12:45:26 <cris_> dape: it was a leftover from old days
12:45:39 <cris_> ... it was also in ExposeThing
12:49:08 <cris_> cris: two comments. It is true that creates confusion. In the CG we got feedback about how it was not clear the process to create a ConsumedThing. Second I recall that the constructor was there for facilitating testing, still we can remove it
12:49:18 <cris_> dape: ok, merging
12:49:30 <cris_> subtopic: PR #512
12:49:52 <cris_> dape: kaz created a script to handle duplicated ids created by a bug in respect
12:49:53 <kaz> s/PR/Issue/
12:50:21 <kaz> i|kaz cre|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/512 Issue 512 - Add perl script (for fixing duplicate IDs) to master/release folder
12:50:37 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:50:38 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:50:47 <cris_> dape: added also readme
12:50:49 <cris_> q+
12:50:58 <kaz> i/Issue #512/PR #518 and Issue #512/
12:51:00 <kaz> q-
12:51:06 <cris_> ack c
12:51:38 <cris_> ... similar to what other repos have
12:51:44 <cris_> ... is that ok to merge it?
12:52:08 <kaz> q+
12:52:22 <cris_> zoltan: ok
12:52:30 <kaz> ack k
12:52:30 <cris_> kaz: ok too, thank you
12:52:33 <cris_> jan: ok too
12:52:55 <kaz> s/ok too,/ok too. if needed, we can modify the description later./
12:53:01 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:53:02 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:53:23 <Mizushima> +1  me too
12:53:37 <kaz> i|Issue 512 -|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/518 PR 518 - refactor: add readme and perl script for publication/release|
12:53:42 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:53:43 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:54:10 <cris_> jan: should we add a followup issue?
12:54:21 <cris_> cris: I little bit overkill but that's ok
12:54:23 <kaz> s/Issue #512/PR #518 and Issue #512/
12:54:24 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:54:26 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:54:45 <cris_> dape: it already there
12:54:57 <kaz> s/I little bit/a little bit/
12:54:59 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:55:00 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:55:06 <cris_> ... Issue 480
12:56:05 <cris_> subtopic: PR 489
12:56:23 <cris_> dape: cristiano worked on better typings
12:56:32 <cris_> ... there were problems
12:58:05 <kaz> i|cristiano worked|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/489 PR 489 - Better types for Scripting API|
12:58:08 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:58:09 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
13:00:08 <cris_> cris: there are tricky parts
13:00:26 <cris_> zoltan: we should take care to not make more restrictions
13:00:36 <cris_> ... than the one are in the algorithms
13:02:15 <JKRhb> I will also have another look into it :) I hadn't had found a solution for the problem so far as well :/
13:03:02 <JKRhb> s/had//
13:03:24 <kaz> [adjourned]
13:03:26 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
13:03:27 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/11/20-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
13:58:37 <mahda-noura> mahda-noura has joined #wot-script
15:27:54 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wot-script