Meeting minutes
Minutes
McCool: (goes through the minutes)
… look fine
(approved)
Publications
Kaz: talked with PLH and he also agreed with using www.w3.org/ns/wot
… note that these days, the trend for Namespace management is putting all the resources under w3c.github.io/w3c/ns and redirect to it from www.w3.org/ns
… w3c.github.io/w3c/wot-resources repository can be mapped to w3c.github.io/ns/wot
McCool: that's fine
… but still need to think about the content negotiation
Kaz: why do we need content negotiation for Discovery resources if all the five files just to be mapped to one specific file for each?
… for example, if discovery-ontology.ttl file has an HTML description, whose name is discovery-ontology.html, we need content-negotiation
… but if it's just one file, we don't need content negotiation based on the content-type
McCool: I'm OK with the direction
… since we need to change the mechanism at some point (e.g., for WoT 2.0)
… in that case, would be better to have "discovery/did" instead of "discovery-did"
… can you make a concrete PR for that purpose?
… or myself can do
Kaz: whichever is fine
github.com/w3c/ns - W3C Namespaces repository
wot-resources repository for WoT WG
www.w3.org/ns/wot (which doesn't exist at the moment)
McCool: we should look into the filenames of the resources again
… we could/should remove redundancy within the filenames too
… for example, "td-discovery-extensions-json-schema" is kind of too long
… so could make it shorter
Kaz: note that the pathname without the suffix should be identical between the published url and the local file
McCool: (changes the published URL and the local file path)
… that would make the things much simpler
Kaz: right
resulted PR 13 on wot-resources - Update URLs
McCool: btw, another question is that we don't have HTML description for Discovery ontologies yet...
Kaz: that's fine at the moment
McCool: but we do need them in the future
wot-resources Issue 15 - Clean up Discovery Resources
McCool: now you're happy. right?
Kaz: yes, and I believe everybody would be also happy later when we need to maintain the resources
McCool: the remaining question is that we need to convince the TD TF as well
… TD 1.1 should use the same mechanism
Kaz: right
[adjourned]