Meeting minutes
<lisa> Agenda
<lisa> https://
<lisa> next item
Lisa: General Research (Becca), Lisa has updated general research
Abbey: Has quickly reviewed research and will present more next week
Eric: Will present remaining github issues next week
Lisa: Abbey to present the research update
Lisa: These two preceding will be reviewed next week
Tiffany: For my asignment there are a significant number of issues. EA has provided email to Lisa to coordinate.
Rashmi: Mental health table updates continuing; tasks within include suggestion, trigger draft, social media, draft for safety
Rashmi: Directly working on first two issue papers
Rashmi: David also working on the first two issue papers
Rain: Structure; working on prototype, then onto qualitative testing. Images needs an update with John K
Lisa: WCAG 3; how to do and get feedback?
Julie: Setting up a tracker for WCAG 3 but needs to connect with Rachael.
Lisa: Internationalization, progressing well. Julie, Addison, Alasdair but not Richard trying to coordinate a meet. Rachael feels that getting more internationalization people would be good.
Julie: Goal of this meeting is to get buy in on the 5 language plan.
<Rachael> Based on all that. I agree with Lisa that you could use the first meeting to discuss best way to communicate and discuss Addison's comments.
Lisa: Other group requests need a discussion about collaborative tools; there is a document around comments processes. An open tag system to alert screen readers has been trialed; we are waiting for APA feedback around whether or not the comment issues were copied to github issues
Lisa: At this point, we aren't sure if these comments are flowing through. Asking if David can liaison between groups
David: Yes, am willing to check on this process in the APA group and will report back if there are issues or if communications haven't really been working.
Lisa: Asking David to check back with this group in two weeks to make sure this technique is working.
<lisa> next item
Lisa: When is the right time to inject comments from COGA into the subgroups?
<julierawe> https://
Julie: We know of multiple venues to work with other groups, it's feeling diffuse. Julie has a proposal (google doc) to know what's coming up, as it is difficult to know whats urgent and whats coming up.
<lisa> this is a better link https://
Rachael: Best way to engage is to join the subgroup; it is difficult to avoid last minute adjustments. Often as little as 6 days before. It isn't likely that the subgroups will change their process in the short term.
Rachael: Exploratory drafts for review will be made available; and there is a chance to review even before that to review and comment
Lisa: We have done some scratchpad level review for each group already.
<lisa> https://
Lisa: The provided doc has links to other useful/usable subgroup information like meeting times, agendas, etc. They seem to be about 2.5 weeks planning ahead
Rachael: We can discuss adding additional states in the document.
Julie: Knowing whats ahead could be helpful to encourage joining the subgroups.
<lisa> next item
<julierawe> +1 to Eric's comment, thanks!
Lisa: Review of Guidance for lit review (COGA 2 literature review and update). Added columns for New Ideas (classification of the kind of idea; new, backs up, etc) and column for subtopics that contain discovered themes or patterns that reoccur.
<kirkwood> could you put literature review link in for minutes
<lisa> next item
Lisa: Agenda 3 and 4 update, Agenda 3 was the Rain's research plan. Agenda 4 relates to the research plan draft outline.. which includes search and research, reading articles thoroughly, analysis, search terms.
<Rain> +1 thank you for adding that
RESOLUTION: is the reserch plan V1 ready
<lisa> +1
+1
<Jennie> +1
<rashmi> +1
<lisa> next item
Lisa: Research plan v1 is OK, no objections.
Lisa; Proposal 3 for mental health
Rashmi: Proposal 3 Add sentence or paragraph for Keep the tone of content simple, positive, be respectful and do not talk down.
<rashmi> https://
Rashmi: Proposal to add as Use a Simple tense and voice pattern
<lisa> Proposal to add as Use a Simple tense and voice pattern
<lisa> +1
0
<lisa> (eric has no opinion
<lisa> john -1
John: This is a proposal to merge tense and respect; they feel like different concepts.
<lisa> changing to a 0
<tburtin> +1 John's opinion
<Rain> +1 agree as well
Lisa: No other strong opinions, will not enact the proposal to merge. These are separate isues
<rashmi> +1 to John's point
<lisa> rain is agreeing with John
<lisa> as does rashmi
<lisa> relution, new pattern
Lisa: Agreed that this will be a new pattern
<lisa> resolution, new pattern
<lisa> no objections
Rashmi: Next proposal #4. Add sentence or paragraph for "Choices of color can be an issue" Alternatively we can make this a pattern. This has strong localization implications
<kirkwood> red is very warm, if not hot. So not sure if this is correct. Think its too complicated and over simplified
Lisa: This one is complicated as there are implications to direct users to select particular colors.
Rain: Applying a tangible concept to color choices; such as evaluate the impact of contrasting/saturation colors?
<Jennie> Apologies - have to drop. Have a good week!
John: Even different industries tend towards color that grab attention; via color relationships.
Lisa: Believe that part of Johns thoughts are that colors can be a distraction, rather than a help
<julierawe> I have to drop, thanks everyone
Rashmi: Row 16 research emphasized warm / vivid colors
Rashmi: Sometimes colors have negative associations; emotional connection for different individuals
Tiffany: If we want to prevent harm, the extremes (of color contrast) can create positive states and negative states (like color extremes for individuals with astigmatisms)
Lisa: Summary, colors are an issue. Maybe we need to lookup or research more on colors, there's more that we want to do.