Meeting minutes
minutes review
<kaz> Oct-11
McCool: any objections to publish the minutes from October 11?
… no objections, publish
quick updates
McCool: no updates
planning
McCool: propose 2 hour meeting for next week
project planning
McCool: propose to finish the policy discussion, then discuss project management
Kaz: there is ongoing work in W3C around project management and something coming out soon
McCool: not clear if we will be able to use the W3C project management approach
Kaz: there is the W3C Process Document as the basics but the working groups still define their own management Note that there is a guideline page also.
<kaz> Gidebook page
face to face day
Kaz: planning for next year
Sebastian: we want to have an event like the 2019 Munich
… Siemens would organize it again, this time in Berlin
… we could combine the event with other WoT activities
… we are considering a W3C workshop
McCool: we don't need an official workshop, and it would be extra work
Kaz: the question is whether we will invite external contributors
Sebastian: we could have a plugfest and invite contributors
… there is a one day event and we can organize other activities around it
Kaz: an official W3C workshop would need to follow a complicated procedure
McCool: we need a proposal, in the meantime plan for June
IG charter
McCool: the IG expires this year (Dec. 31)
… we need to decide if we need the IG
… we need to schedule the charter discussion
… it takes 2 months for review
Kaz: the IG charter should be easier and we can probably copy the existing charter
McCool: let's have the discussion right away so there is enough time for review
… put it on the calendar
Ege: if we don't have an IG, can we transfer the marketing and use case work to the WG?
McCool: the discussion is whether the CG can take over some of the IG tasks
Kaz: transferring tasks is complicated
McCool: let's discuss it next week
meeting schedule changes
McCool: having special use case calls October 19 and 26
… waiting for the time change before rescheduling the TD meeting
… any other holidays or conflicts?
Sebastian: November 1
McCool: we are planning the policy discussion on November 1st
McCool: we should move the policy discussion to November 8th
… any other conflicts?
… reminder about the week of confusion time change
… for the use case meeting, mm will prepare a template and will discuss organizing use case work
… any other schedule changes or conflicts
Kaz: will reschedule the TD coordination call
publications
specs
McCool: is the TD rec ready for publication?
Ege: yes
<Ege> https://
McCool: let's do the resolution
<McCool> proposal: Proceed with REC transition for TD 1.1 based on version staged in https://
McCool: are there any changes or objections to the resolution?
Ege: forgot to fix McCool's affiliation
Daniel: similar issue on other documents
McCool: Intel has local companies and it is confusing, so we should use Intel Corp
McCool: any objections to the resolution?
RESOLUTION: Proceed with REC transition for TD 1.1 based on version staged in https://
McCool: resolved to publish the TD Recommendation
McCool: still have some cleanup to do so the publication will be next week
resources
<kaz> wot-thing-description/NAMESPACES.md
<kaz> wot-discovery/publication/6-resources/README.md
McCool: reviewing the resources directory organization
… comparing discovery vs. TD resources organization
… concerns about the included README and file names
… also a question around how to handle models
Ege: the problem is redirecting
… we need to provide the github locations
McCool: if the README is included in the directory, it will get copied over
Ege: the structure comes from many assumptions that were made earlier
McCool: we need to document the exact steps needed for publication
McCool: there are questions about how to document and how to organize
… would like to merge the discovery resources as-is even though there are some inconsistencies
Ege: there are some messy things but it will be difficult to change them
McCool: how can we make the discovery resources and TD resources consistent?
Kaz: once the resources are published under the wot-resources repository, it will be nice to have a table of the URLs including the information which URL (https://
McCool: would like to merge the discovery resources PR
… any objection?
… PR #552
… there is a PR for TD resources but it's missing a table
Ege: should there be one top level table or a table for each spec?
McCool: a table for each version
Ege: separate tables is better
McCool: marking the TD README as DRAFT and will merge now, expecting another PR to update the README
Kaz: We have resolved to publich TD 1.1, what about the other specifications?
McCool: do they all need to have the same date?
McCool: we have minor updates to do on discovery and architecture
McCool: we are still waiting for the press release also, let's generate transition requests for all the three RECs next week.
McCool: there are 5 PRs on the press release, can we merge them and get a final version we can review?
AOB
McCool: we're out of time, are there any other items?
<kaz> wot PRs with "Press" label
Ege: we're publishing the TD call agenda 1 week in advance
McCool: adjourned
<kaz> i|we'reout|topic: AOB|