IRC log of dxwg on 2023-08-23
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 10:45:37 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dxwg
- 10:45:41 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-irc
- 10:45:58 [LarsG]
- zakim, please start meeting
- 10:45:58 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 10:46:00 [Zakim]
- please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), LarsG
- 10:46:21 [LarsG]
- Meeting: DXWG CNEG Telecon
- 10:57:26 [LarsG]
- Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2023.08.23
- 10:58:02 [YoucTagh]
- YoucTagh has joined #dxwg
- 11:03:08 [roba]
- roba has joined #dxwg
- 11:03:32 [roba]
- present +
- 11:03:38 [YoucTagh]
- present +
- 11:03:41 [LarsG]
- Chair: roba
- 11:03:44 [LarsG]
- present+
- 11:03:54 [LarsG]
- ScribeNick: LarsG
- 11:04:10 [LarsG]
- https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2023.08.23
- 11:07:27 [pchampin]
- present+
- 11:10:15 [LarsG]
- PROPOSED: Approve minutes
- 11:10:21 [pchampin]
- +0
- 11:10:27 [YoucTagh]
- +1
- 11:10:29 [LarsG]
- https://www.w3.org/2023/08/09-dxwg-minutes.html
- 11:10:32 [LarsG]
- +1
- 11:10:32 [roba]
- +1
- 11:10:45 [LarsG]
- RESOLVED: Minutes approved
- 11:11:36 [LarsG]
- TOPIC: Check status of actions from last meeting
- 11:11:37 [nicholascar]
- nicholascar has joined #dxwg
- 11:11:41 [nicholascar]
- present+
- 11:11:46 [LarsG]
- https://www.w3.org/2023/08/09-dxwg-minutes.html#ActionSummary
- 11:12:59 [LarsG]
- roba: LarsG has created PR which is approved
- 11:13:13 [LarsG]
- LarsG: will ping kcoyle to ask for input
- 11:16:25 [LarsG]
- roba: #23, #26 and #27 not yet addressed
- 11:16:48 [LarsG]
- roba: No discussion wich nicholascar on #32
- 11:17:23 [LarsG]
- s/#32/#32 yet/
- 11:17:40 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: don't like full URIs here
- 11:18:24 [LarsG]
- ... AltP is not correct any more
- 11:18:31 [LarsG]
- ... should be AltR
- 11:19:45 [LarsG]
- roba: cpnr is defined in the document but altr isn't
- 11:20:09 [pchampin]
- q+
- 11:20:24 [LarsG]
- ACTION: nicholascar to address #32
- 11:21:03 [LarsG]
- pchampin: is replacement of altp with altr correct?
- 11:21:28 [LarsG]
- ... we usually have a table with all prefixes in the document
- 11:21:58 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: will tend to that
- 11:22:08 [pchampin]
- q-
- 11:23:09 [LarsG]
- YoucTagh: revised #44
- 11:24:25 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: sceptical of solution
- 11:24:45 [LarsG]
- ... canonical should be the default
- 11:25:03 [LarsG]
- ... everything else is alternate
- 11:25:21 [LarsG]
- roba: will not implement preferred
- 11:25:36 [LarsG]
- ... so there will be no implementation evidence
- 11:25:45 [LarsG]
- ... thus feature at risk
- 11:26:00 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: seems like an error in our document
- 11:26:46 [LarsG]
- YoucTagh: Intention is to flag the preferred representation for a specific dimension
- 11:26:58 [LarsG]
- ... canonical is the global fallback
- 11:27:15 [LarsG]
- ... but we need a way to show which is the best representation
- 11:27:42 [LarsG]
- ... for a specific combination of dimensions
- 11:28:20 [pchampin]
- q+
- 11:28:39 [LarsG]
- ack pchampin
- 11:29:03 [LarsG]
- pchampin: Agree that only one canonical allowed
- 11:29:17 [LarsG]
- ... so we need something else to convey the semantics
- 11:30:04 [nicholascar]
- q+
- 11:30:10 [LarsG]
- ... at the moment we have no way to convey the input dimensions
- 11:30:40 [LarsG]
- YoucTagh: that's what the "dim" is for
- 11:31:02 [LarsG]
- roba: Currently no driver for "preferred"
- 11:31:36 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: There is order of presedence (profle, media type)
- 11:31:56 [LarsG]
- ... in the model there are default formats for each media type
- 11:32:20 [LarsG]
- q?
- 11:33:21 [LarsG]
- ... we _can_ push this to any dimension (incl. lang)
- 11:33:41 [LarsG]
- roba: have implemented slightly differently
- 11:33:58 [LarsG]
- ... giving error message instead of default
- 11:34:35 [LarsG]
- ... do YoucTagh have use cases to support the proposal?
- 11:35:05 [LarsG]
- YoucTagh: Not now. Solution emerged from our last discussion
- 11:35:23 [LarsG]
- roba: Will catch up with nicholascar to see that their implementations
- 11:35:34 [LarsG]
- ... are similar and adhere to the spec
- 11:36:43 [LarsG]
- ... we still keep #44 open until the multiple "canonical" is resolved
- 11:37:22 [LarsG]
- SUBTOPIC: Review of §7.1
- 11:38:46 [LarsG]
- YoucTagh: Have reviewed the text
- 11:39:17 [LarsG]
- ... in the context of #7
- 11:39:42 [LarsG]
- ... still unclear if "the profile" refers to "data profile"
- 11:39:59 [LarsG]
- ... or to "functional profile". Is that on purpose?
- 11:40:18 [LarsG]
- roba: Should be "functional profile"
- 11:40:49 [LarsG]
- YoucTagh: Spec talks of "human browser"
- 11:41:11 [LarsG]
- ... we can use URLs without human browsers, however,
- 11:41:59 [LarsG]
- ... also conforming (with|to) - confusing for non-native speakers -
- 11:43:47 [LarsG]
- ... Listing in spec (Code listing 1) is not consistent with TTL file
- 11:43:56 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: will take care of that
- 11:44:54 [LarsG]
- ACTION: nicholascar to find solution for automatic linking of external content
- 11:45:11 [LarsG]
- pchampin: All documents in /TR must be self-contained
- 11:45:29 [LarsG]
- ... there is now an automated process for document publication
- 11:45:46 [LarsG]
- ... for documents in draft status
- 11:47:53 [pchampin]
- PROPOSED: use Echidna to auto-publish workind drafts from branch gh-pages
- 11:48:13 [nicholascar]
- +1
- 11:48:14 [LarsG]
- s/workind/working/
- 11:49:38 [roba]
- +1
- 11:49:44 [pchampin]
- +1
- 11:49:48 [YoucTagh]
- +1
- 11:49:49 [LarsG]
- pchampin: the point is to publish all EDs as WDs
- 11:49:51 [LarsG]
- +1
- 11:50:07 [LarsG]
- RESOLVED: use Echidna to auto-publish workind drafts from branch gh-pages
- 11:50:45 [LarsG]
- ACTION: pchampin to set up echidna to auto-publish working drafts from branch gh-pages
- 11:50:54 [LarsG]
- s/workind/working/
- 11:52:55 [LarsG]
- YoucTagh: cnpr:rrd is not clear
- 11:53:24 [LarsG]
- ... this is already implied when implementing http or qsa
- 11:53:26 [LarsG]
- nic
- 11:53:54 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: It implies a hierarchy. We need a diagram to describe it
- 11:53:59 [LarsG]
- s/nic//
- 11:54:58 [LarsG]
- roba: It seems that the terminology as such is fine.
- 11:55:10 [LarsG]
- ... We need PRs to fix the minor issues
- 11:55:32 [LarsG]
- ... then we can mark the issue as due-for-closing
- 11:55:45 [LarsG]
- ... and high-light it to the group
- 11:57:10 [LarsG]
- q+
- 11:58:06 [LarsG]
- ACTION: roba to update §7.1 based on YoucTagh's feedback
- 11:58:36 [roba]
- https://github.com/w3c/dx-connegp/issues
- 11:58:49 [LarsG]
- q-
- 11:58:54 [LarsG]
- q- nicholascar
- 11:59:09 [LarsG]
- TOPIC: Next meeting
- 11:59:27 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: We should look at the implementation report
- 12:00:09 [LarsG]
- roba: Also #37
- 12:00:18 [LarsG]
- nicholascar: Can prepare text for that
- 12:00:40 [LarsG]
- roba: We cannot assign tasks to nicholascar
- 12:00:58 [LarsG]
- ... can pchampin have a look at that?
- 12:01:08 [LarsG]
- pchampin: Will look into that
- 12:01:30 [LarsG]
- ACTION: pchampin to check why we cannot assign tasks to nicholascar
- 12:02:47 [nicholascar]
- present-
- 12:02:48 [LarsG]
- RRSAgent, pleas draft minutes v2
- 12:02:48 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'pleas draft minutes v2', LarsG. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 12:02:59 [LarsG]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2
- 12:03:00 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-minutes.html LarsG
- 12:04:30 [LarsG]
- RRSAgent, please excuse us
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- I see 5 open action items saved in https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-actions.rdf :
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: nicholascar to address #32 [1]
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-irc#T11-20-24
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: nicholascar to find solution for automatic linking of external content [2]
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-irc#T11-44-54
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: pchampin to set up echidna to auto-publish working drafts from branch gh-pages [3]
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-irc#T11-50-45
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: roba to update §7.1 based on YoucTagh's feedback [4]
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-irc#T11-58-06
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: pchampin to check why we cannot assign tasks to nicholascar [5]
- 12:04:30 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in https://www.w3.org/2023/08/23-dxwg-irc#T12-01-30