16:00:52 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 16:00:56 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-irc 16:00:59 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/931e4e54-81ad-4aa3-a39f-84efe4b788c7/20230817T120000/ 16:01:00 clear agenda 16:01:00 agenda+ Scribe: Haudebourg, Timothée (alternate: Hartig, Olaf) 16:01:00 agenda+ Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/08/10-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:01:00 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 16:01:01 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 16:01:04 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 16:02:13 present+ 16:02:22 Present+ 16:02:34 present+ 16:02:35 Zakim, draft minutes 16:02:35 I don't understand 'draft minutes', Adrian 16:02:52 olaf has joined #rdf-star 16:02:58 Zakim, help 16:02:59 Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot for more detailed help. 16:02:59 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:03:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html gkellogg 16:03:02 Some of the commands I know are: 16:03:02 xxx is yyy - establish yyy as the name of unknown party xxx 16:03:02 if yyy is 'me' or 'I', your nick is substituted 16:03:02 xxx may be yyy - establish yyy as possibly the name of unknown party xxx 16:03:02 I am xxx - establish your nick as the name of unknown party xxx 16:03:02 xxx holds yyy [, zzz ...] - establish xxx as a group name and yyy, etc. as participants within that group 16:03:02 xxx also holds yyy - add yyy to the list of participants in group xxx 16:03:02 who's here? - lists the participants on the phone 16:03:02 who's muted? - lists the participants who are muted 16:03:02 mute xxx - mutes party xxx (like pressing 61#) 16:03:02 present+ 16:03:03 unmute xxx - reverses the effect of "mute" and of 61# 16:03:04 is xxx here? - reports whether a party named like xxx is present 16:03:06 list conferences - reports the active conferences 16:03:07 this is xxx - associates this channel with conference xxx 16:03:07 excuse us - disconnects from the irc channel 16:03:08 I last learned something new on $Date: 2020/12/31 21:20:53 $ 16:03:08 Argh, every time ;) 16:03:46 present+ 16:04:14 present+ 16:04:35 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:05:01 Regrets+ pfps 16:06:12 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:06:18 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 16:06:55 present+ 16:07:08 present+ 16:07:24 Souri has joined #rdf-star 16:07:24 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:07:29 present+ 16:07:30 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 16:07:36 present+ 16:07:39 Scribe: olaf 16:08:04 Zakim, open agendum 1 16:08:04 agendum 1 -- Scribe: Haudebourg, Timothée (alternate: Hartig, Olaf) -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:08:06 draggett: pchampin is on vacation 16:08:16 Regret+ pchampin 16:08:16 Zakim, close agendum 1 16:08:16 agendum 1, Scribe: Haudebourg, Timothée (alternate: Hartig, Olaf), closed 16:08:18 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:08:18 2. Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/08/10-rdf-star-minutes.html [from agendabot] 16:08:26 Zakim, open agendum 2 16:08:26 agendum 2 -- Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/08/10-rdf-star-minutes.html -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:09:32 ktk: started doing my part for the "what still needs to be done" 16:09:44 ... but not yet read for ''prime time'' 16:09:50 s/read/ready 16:10:14 ora: ktk and I will be collecting items for such a list 16:10:30 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:10:46 ... generally, we are at a point where we should start backwards from such a list 16:10:47 PROPOSAL: Accept last week’s minutes 16:10:53 +1 16:10:59 ... the github issues list is a start 16:10:59 +1 16:11:12 q? 16:11:23 +1 16:11:29 +1 16:11:29 +1 16:11:29 +1 16:11:31 +1 16:11:33 +1 16:11:42 +1 16:12:21 RESOLUTION: Accept last week’s minutes 16:12:41 Zakim, next agendum 16:12:42 agendum 3 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:13:04 ora: I have not made progress on my open action 16:13:14 gkellogg: I have two 16:13:39 ... I have created the use case, the link to it is in the issue 16:13:59 ... one of the two action issues is a duplicate of the other 16:14:14 The above link returns 404 for me 16:14:17 ora: I don't think we can discuss any of the other action items today 16:14:35 ... b/c they are on pchampin 16:14:46 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:14:47 Zakim, next agendum 16:14:47 agendum 4 -- Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:15:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:15:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:15:19 ktk: ora and I talked about it 16:15:33 ... we would like to find one of you to take care of some of the never-ending issues 16:15:42 ... such as the one about the mobile layout 16:16:19 ... Question is: could someone do this job? 16:16:53 i|ora and I talked about it|subtopic: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/pull/30 16:16:55 ora: It is an editors' job 16:17:06 ... but one that spans all documents 16:17:08 q+ 16:17:15 ack gkellogg 16:17:19 ... It would be great if someone takes this. 16:17:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:17:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:17:43 gkellogg: I think what Tomas has done is great. 16:17:57 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:18:13 ... We just need a mechanism such that "it" (?) doesn't turn into a roadblock when there is a rejection 16:18:41 ... Some specs have some styling consideration that is beyond boiler plate (e.g., SPARQL query) 16:19:14 ... maybe we should focus on a PC screen and do a best effort for mobile 16:19:19 S/… We just/gkellog: We just/ 16:20:08 ora: some of these specs are so complex that reading them on a mobile screen in a pleasant way is probably not possible 16:20:30 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:20:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:20:41 s/Tomas/Domenic 16:20:56 ktk: shall we ask him to take this job? 16:21:25 gkellogg: other long-running issue is base direction 16:21:26 s|S/… We just/gkellog: We just/|| 16:21:26 s/... We just/gkellog: We just/ 16:21:45 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:21:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:21:54 ... we cannot do anythig about it today because "they" (?) have not come back to us about it 16:22:06 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:22:08 q+ 16:22:24 ack ora 16:22:30 ... other open issue is IRI-related language 16:23:03 ora: It would be great for the issues dashboard to see how long each issue has been open 16:23:25 q+ 16:23:27 gkellogg: I think it is a partial order in this list 16:23:27 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:23:44 ora: there are two editorial PRs 16:24:03 ... have been there for more than a week? 16:24:37 ... Andy, what did you request for the IRI spec? 16:24:57 AndyS: The IRI spec has some counter-intuitive language 16:25:10 ... the IRI spec is basically wrong 16:25:21 ... we should avoid the word "absolute" 16:25:49 "absolute reference"? 16:25:52 ... The language that we / the community have used is all over the place. 16:26:17 gkellogg: I believe your concern was addressed in the text! ? 16:26:48 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:27:20 AndyS: The IRI spec didn't update is language after the changes of the URI spec, but it also didn't get much attention. 16:27:25 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:27:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html Adrian 16:27:43 ... I will try to find some time in the next few days to look at this issue/PR again 16:28:03 ... Greg, did you make changes to other docs in this context? 16:28:28 s/Greg/Gregg/ 16:28:33 gkellogg: No. But it is probably worth scanning through them. 16:28:43 ... I will do that. 16:29:07 Chair: ora 16:29:34 ora: What's our status regarding the DOM references? 16:29:42 gkellogg: ready to go 16:30:14 ... we were just waiting for 2+ weeks because it is a substantial change 16:30:34 ... but now it has been open long enough 16:30:42 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:30:42 ... so, I will merge it 16:31:02 q? 16:31:07 ack AndyS 16:31:14 Zakim, next agendum 16:31:14 agendum 5 -- Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:31:48 AndyS: regarding the mobile-related issue, probably one of the tables in the SPARQL spec is a special case 16:31:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:31:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:32:00 ... the one about the operator mapping; it is huge 16:32:29 huh... I thought AOB would follow open issues (https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/5) 16:32:48 ora: Looking at the SPARQL spec, why do the read queries allow a VALUES clause to be added to the query, but not the update queries? 16:32:55 AndyS: rationale is 16:33:12 ... there was a lot of work on query federation 16:33:36 ... there was a system called Garlic, which had notion of bind join implemented 16:33:47 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:34:09 ... for which they wanted to use the VALUES clause at the end of the query, but that does not work 16:35:17 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:35:19 Adrian: as a user, VALUES always confuses me -- when to use it 16:35:40 AndyS: VALUES at the end has a different semantics than VALUES inside WHERE 16:35:45 q+ 16:35:50 ... question to ora... 16:35:50 q+ 16:36:09 ... what about the use cases about your work? 16:36:40 ora: We have a use case doc for our 1G project. But most of them do not really apply here. 16:37:15 ... I could send short descriptions of them. Then, others can look at them to check whether these ones are already covered. 16:37:20 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:37:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html Adrian 16:38:29 Ack gkellogg 16:38:29 ... I will do for our meeting in two weeks from now. 16:38:29 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/6?filterQuery=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22needs+discussion%22 16:38:29 gkellogg: Label on the dashboard for 'needs discussion' 16:39:21 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:39:33 q+ 16:39:42 q+ 16:39:51 ... language tags 16:40:15 ora: We should have a discussion about it. 16:40:43 ... Does it make sense to have a proposal/writeup of possible choice on how to proceed? 16:41:09 ... Case sensitivity of language tags seems like an underspecification. 16:41:18 q? 16:41:29 ack AndyS 16:41:31 AndyS: There is a SPARQL test relies on language tags. 16:41:41 Project view very much needs to include last-updated and created dates (and be sortable by these, either ascending or descending), maybe @pchampin could research? 16:41:41 https://github.com/pchampin -> @pchampin 16:41:46 ... gives a little bit (but not conclusive) suggestion for a change. 16:41:50 ack Adrian 16:41:57 Adrian has joined #rdf-star 16:42:03 ktk: Who joins us in Sevilla for TPAC? 16:42:10 AndyS: Cannot 16:42:18 ora: I will be there. 16:42:27 gkellogg: I will be there on Zoom. 16:42:29 ack niklasl 16:42:42 I have a conflicting meeting in Munich, sorry. 16:42:42 niklasl: I had thought on the lang.tag question 16:42:52 ... or normalization in general 16:43:11 Where is the line drawn between ... (?) 16:43:49 ... is there something more generally to be said about it -- related to entailments 16:44:00 s/it/it? 16:44:32 ora: Are you suggesting something like the datatype entailment but for languages? 16:44:34 q+ 16:44:36 q+ 16:44:46 q+ to ask about reviewing Open Issues (anticipated to precede AOB)... future Agendas might need correction 16:44:49 niklasl: Yes, I think I do :-) 16:45:54 ack AndyS 16:46:16 AndyS: The semantics doc has an entailment for language tags, namely D-Entailment 16:46:38 ... but we need to put this elsewhere 16:46:44 ack gkellogg 16:47:10 gkellogg: Yes we need to clarifying the question. 16:47:28 ... Not doing it would violate the ... (?) spec 16:47:55 ... Language tag is not quoted but it is a token. 16:48:36 Tpo has joined #RDF-star 16:48:37 ... Later we can talk about, what is the canonical form of a lang.tag. 16:48:56 niklasl: Yes, what Gregg suggested makes sense and is a reasonable scope. 16:50:03 ack TallTed 16:50:03 TallTed, you wanted to ask about reviewing Open Issues (anticipated to precede AOB)... future Agendas might need correction 16:50:03 ... (I am trying to write down something about "structured literals") 16:50:08 q+ 16:50:14 The SPARQL test is strlang03.rq 16:50:32 TallTed: For the future, add to the agenda to review open issues 16:51:03 ... because otherwise we keep accumulating them 16:51:36 ack ora 16:52:33 maybe start by giving us a prepublication link for review/comment? 16:54:18 Consider GeoRDF: https://www.w3.org/wiki/GeoRDF 16:54:31 TallTed, I still need to get approval from Legal for making the repo with the material public 16:54:47 s/strlang03.rq/directory functions, strlang03-rdf11 16:55:18 present+ 16:55:41 TallTed: minutes look ok for me so far 16:55:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:55:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:56:09 Anyone still here in IRC? What do I need to do regarding the scribing? 16:56:24 olaf: we will close it thanks 16:56:35 Thanks!! 16:56:35 Bye 16:56:49 TallTed: we don't have a title yet it seems 16:57:07 bye olaf 16:57:11 meeting: RDF-star Working Group Weekly Call 16:57:16 tnx 16:57:30 no problem, thanks 16:57:34 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:57:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:57:42 @gkellogg Yes, GeoRDF is a perfect example of datatyped-string <-> entity "isomorphism. Also, common "simple" xsd:date value have multiple properties, "conceptually". 16:57:42 https://github.com/gkellogg -> @gkellogg 16:58:30 we can leave the rest for pchampin to clean up offline :-) 16:58:39 Zakim, end meeting 16:58:39 As of this point the attendees have been gkellogg, Adrian, ora, Tpt, TallTed, AndyS, olaf, niklasl, Souri, doerthe, draggett 16:58:40 yes looks good 16:58:42 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:58:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/08/17-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 16:58:50 tnx 16:58:50 I am happy to have been of service, TallTed; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:58:50 Zakim has left #rdf-star 16:58:55 RRSAgent, bye 16:58:55 I see no action items previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/08/10-rdf-star-minutes.html next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/08/24-rdf-star-minutes.html