15:54:25 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:54:29 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-irc 15:54:55 Agenda https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/931e4e54-81ad-4aa3-a39f-84efe4b788c7/20230720T120000/ 15:55:02 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/931e4e54-81ad-4aa3-a39f-84efe4b788c7/20230720T120000/ 15:55:02 clear agenda 15:55:02 agenda+ Scribe: Thibodeau, Ted (alternate: Haudebourg, Timothée) 15:55:02 agenda+ Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/07/13-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:55:02 agenda+ Update on Use Cases 15:55:03 agenda+ Update on Semantic TF 15:55:05 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 15:55:08 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 15:55:11 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 15:55:40 regret+ azimmermann 15:55:47 Zakim, draft minutes 15:55:47 I don't understand 'draft minutes', ktk 15:57:08 AndyS has joined #rdf-star 15:57:34 TallTed: what was the command again for drafting minutes? 15:58:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:58:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 15:58:28 ah, wrong bot then :) thanks 15:58:29 present+ 15:58:36 present+ 15:58:43 Chair+ 15:59:23 scribe+ 15:59:27 present+ 16:00:14 TallTed: I don't get the minutes yet, you? 16:00:28 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:00:53 s/TallTed: what was the command again for drafting minutes?// 16:01:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:01:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:01:10 regret+ rtaelman 16:01:12 present+ 16:01:23 regret+ dtomaszuk 16:01:34 s/regret+ rtaelman/regrets+ rtaelman/ 16:01:36 present+ 16:01:40 regret+ EFranconi 16:01:44 pfps has joined #rdf-star 16:01:47 s/regret+ dtomaszuk/regrets+ dtomaszuk/ 16:01:53 present+ 16:01:54 present+ 16:01:56 s/regret+ EFranconi/regrets+ EFranconi/ 16:01:58 regret+ souri 16:02:11 s/regret+ souri/regrets+ souri/ 16:02:17 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:02:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:02:25 present+ 16:02:35 s/ah, wrong bot then :) thanks// 16:02:43 s/TallTed: I don't get the minutes yet, you?// 16:02:58 ora has joined #rdf-star 16:03:05 present+ 16:03:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:03:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:03:12 chair: ora: 16:03:12 chair: ora 16:03:21 Zakim, first agendum 16:03:21 I don't understand 'first agendum', TallTed 16:03:22 present+ 16:03:31 zakim, open first item 16:03:31 I don't understand 'open first item', TallTed 16:03:40 Zakim, open first agendum 16:03:40 I don't understand 'open first agendum', TallTed 16:03:58 Zakim, open agendum 1 16:03:58 agendum 1 -- Scribe: Thibodeau, Ted (alternate: Haudebourg, Timothée) -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:04:10 Zakim, close agendum 1 16:04:10 agendum 1, Scribe: Thibodeau, Ted (alternate: Haudebourg, Timothée), closed 16:04:12 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:04:12 2. Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/07/13-rdf-star-minutes.html [from agendabot] 16:04:27 Zakim, open agendum 2 16:04:27 agendum 2 -- Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/07/13-rdf-star-minutes.html -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:05:04 minutes look fine to me 16:05:32 proposal: Approve last week's minutes 16:05:39 +1 16:05:42 +1 16:05:45 +1 16:05:45 +0 16:05:46 +1 16:05:46 +1 16:05:47 +1 16:06:27 +1 16:06:29 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:06:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:07:06 +1 16:07:06 +1 16:07:06 resolved: Approve last week's minutes 16:07:06 Zakim, next agendum 16:07:06 agendum 3 -- Update on Use Cases -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:07:29 The UCR summary wiki page is https://github.com/w3c/rdf-ucr/wiki/Summary 16:08:04 scribe: TallTed 16:08:14 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:08:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:09:06 pfps: has been working through the UCR stack, back-and-forth with submitters. Would like more use cases, and for some of the CG use cases to be shepherded by others 16:09:36 q? 16:09:39 q+ 16:09:45 ... would like to schedule time on a future call to review UCR in depth 16:09:54 ack ora 16:10:12 q+ 16:10:35 ora: notes the large number of regrets for recent meetings, perhaps we should take a break for summer? 16:10:40 ack niklasl 16:11:09 richard_lea has joined #rdf-star 16:11:19 niklasl: volunteers to help with existing use cases, and has some others to submit when in better shape 16:11:30 pfps: welcomes even rough submissions 16:12:13 present+ 16:12:37 Zakim, next agendum 16:12:37 agendum 4 -- Update on Semantic TF -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:13:09 [ lacking enrico, postponing Semantic TF update] 16:13:18 Zakim, next agendum 16:13:18 agendum 4 was just opened, TallTed 16:13:24 Zakim, close agendum 4 16:13:24 agendum 4, Update on Semantic TF, closed 16:13:25 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:13:25 5. Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 [from agendabot] 16:13:34 Zakim, next agendum 16:13:34 agendum 5 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:13:55 q+ 16:14:21 q+ 16:14:30 ora: still working on proposal wording for https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19 16:14:36 ack pchampin 16:15:09 pchampin: is keeping https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/55 and https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/63 open 16:15:29 q+ 16:15:30 ... created https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/77 and it's in progress 16:16:16 q? 16:16:17 ... IPR changes may delay that progress a bit 16:16:27 ack gkellogg 16:16:34 q+ 16:17:06 gkellogg: on https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/63 N-Triples 1.1 mis-links outward, may need updates on that 16:17:43 ... on test suites, we had discussed join ownership with JSON-LD WG, to make issues & PRs show up on each other's dashboards 16:18:19 q+ 16:18:21 ... on https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/76, both areas have been updated 16:18:35 ack ora 16:19:13 ack pchampin 16:19:23 ora: related to short names, had some challenge getting to SPARQL 1.1, was prompted for W3C credentials, seemed like transient fluke 16:20:06 pchampin: gkellogg noticed that some github actions related to adding PRs and Issues to dashboard were misbehaving 16:20:24 ACTION: pchampin to investigate hiccups in github actions 16:20:31 Created -> action #78 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/78 16:20:31 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-quads/actions/runs/5611766553/job/15203988524 16:21:01 Github can be flakey, sometimes. 16:21:50 ... TPAC organizers have requested lightning talks, and pushed for a 10 minute presentation on our 18 documents 16:21:51 champin.net/2023/rdf-star-wds.svg 16:21:55 champin.net/2023/rdf-star-wds.svg#concepts#concepts 16:22:14 s/#concepts#concepts/#concepts/ 16:23:10 ack AndyS 16:23:13 ... will share a script for approval, and then produce a video for TPAC 16:23:54 AndyS: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/76 is not yet complete as an action; only the plan is complete 16:24:01 q? 16:24:04 q+ 16:25:00 ack gkellogg 16:25:19 s/is not yet complete as an action; only the plan is complete/is complete/ 16:25:50 gkellogg: historically, tests have not been considered substantive, have been treated as immune from IPR considerations 16:25:59 ... we should investigate that for this project 16:26:26 ora: pchampin should be able to get that info 16:26:44 q? 16:27:17 q+ 16:27:33 ack pchampin 16:29:16 [group] we might want to set up a place for tests that suggest spec changes 16:29:22 q? 16:29:26 Zakim, next agendum 16:29:26 agendum 6 -- Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:29:47 q+ 16:29:58 q+ to discuss mobile display 16:30:04 ack AndyS 16:30:32 AndyS: meta-item, a PR I looked at today had preview and diff which were unrelated to the PR 16:30:54 s/preview and diff which were/diff which was/ 16:31:00 q? 16:31:01 ... preview was fine 16:31:18 sometimes documents included by respec behave strangely with preview and diff, but this sounds like a different issue... 16:31:22 gkellogg: there are hack-y ways to do this, if needed 16:31:34 ack pfps 16:31:34 pfps, you wanted to discuss mobile display 16:31:34 https://services.w3.org/htmldiff 16:31:55 q+ 16:31:57 pfps: What's required to push the mobile phone display issue? 16:32:23 q+ 16:32:28 ack pchampin 16:32:30 pchampin: recollection was that we would rather try to fix dominic's issue, rather than try to solve all mobile issues 16:33:20 pfps: can't resolve it by just closing this PR because most documents have a CSS change, one doc does not 16:33:57 ack ktk 16:34:19 q+ 16:34:37 ktk: I suggest we revert all these changes, so all docs are in same state, and then review screenshots of specific issues toward resolving those, rather than trying to solve all theoretical issues 16:35:06 ... I suggest each such problem be raised its own issue and carried to its resolution 16:36:42 pfps: currently, variations on CSS change have been applied to most if not all docs other than rdf-semantics, which mess with display in narrow window on large screen, not just with display on narrow screen 16:36:42 q? 16:37:13 ack gkellogg 16:37:18 ... variations of result depend on whether viewing at w3.org, github.io, etc., even though the content is ostensibly the same 16:37:54 gkellogg: CSS varies rather a lot across our 20 documents, regardless of how much they may have matched in the past 16:38:39 ... most docs look OK to me. aside from one odd table in one doc 16:39:05 q+ 16:39:48 ack TallTed 16:40:36 scribe+ 16:40:40 TallTed: I see two options: dig into each document and make them "good" (for some definition of "good") 16:41:11 q+ 16:41:11 ... or copy the content of each document under some boilerplate CSS (a lot of work) 16:41:18 ack ora 16:41:40 ora: my take is that someday, we'll need to fix this ... if not now, when? 16:41:43 scribe- 16:42:00 q+ 16:42:17 ack AndyS 16:42:19 ... will individual editors take this on for their set? will other people volunteer for just this cleanup? 16:43:04 AndyS: the SPARQL docs probably need to be considered separately, because they have a lot of special formatting that doesn't play well with ReSpec, orthogonally to the mobile screens issue 16:44:15 q+ 16:44:15 ... hoped to push CSS later in the process than the substantive content 16:44:29 ack gkellogg 16:44:56 gkellogg: dominic spent quite some time on this, but there is still far to go 16:45:21 ... agrees that substantive content is far more important. CSS could be pushed past CR. 16:45:45 q? 16:46:27 ora: concurs with focusing on content rather than CSS 16:47:42 gkellogg: by and large, the RDF docs aren't bad 16:48:12 AndyS: SPARQL docs have nested styling, and a lot of troublesome color coding 16:49:21 AndyS: the media-type language issues should be quickly handled 16:49:53 gkellogg: privacy considerations seem to be pretty well baked in https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/52 and can be echoed on the other RDF docs 16:50:15 ora: how about BNF change? 16:50:53 gkellogg: still working on N-triples https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/34, still blocked by https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/48 16:51:06 ora: will poke I18n 16:51:35 Zakim, next agendum 16:51:35 agendum 7 -- Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:51:50 ora: should we have a summer break? 16:51:52 q+ 16:52:01 ack TallTed 16:52:04 scribe+ 16:52:29 TallTed: we can take a poll among ourselves 16:53:01 AndyS: wonders about semantics TF in particular 16:53:13 ... and approvals of document changes 16:53:16 q? 16:53:23 semantics is at least partly waiting for approved test cases 16:53:54 ora: will be away third week of August. knows others will be away at least part of August. 16:54:28 s/third week/fourth week/ 16:54:55 [group] can take it as it comes 16:55:35 Zakim, close agendum 16:55:35 I don't understand 'close agendum', TallTed 16:55:41 Zakim, close agendum 7 16:55:41 agendum 7, Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting, closed 16:55:42 I see nothing remaining on the agenda 16:55:52 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:55:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:56:29 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:56:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:58:06 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/07/13-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:58:18 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/07/27-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:58:21 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:58:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:58:59 Zakim, end meeting 16:58:59 As of this point the attendees have been TallTed, ktk, pchampin, gkellogg, gtw, niklasl, pfps, Tpt, ora, AndyS, richard_lea 16:58:59 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:59:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 16:59:35 I am happy to have been of service, TallTed; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:59:35 Zakim has left #rdf-star 16:59:37 RRSAgent, bye 16:59:37 I see 1 open action item saved in https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-actions.rdf : 16:59:37 ACTION: pchampin to investigate hiccups in github actions [1] 16:59:37 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2023/07/20-rdf-star-irc#T16-20-24 meeting: RDF-star Working Group weekly meeting