Meeting minutes
ACTION-2341: Update function signatures in spec (Steven)
https://
Steven: Done
CLose ACTION-2341
<trackbot> Closed ACTION-2341.
ACTION-2342: Spec the event communication for further discussion.
(Steven)
https://
https://
Steven: Preparing this specification, I discovered questions I didn't have an immediate answer for, so thought it would be good if we discussed it.
Erik: I think we discussed whether the ref needs to be an element before
Steven: Yes, I'd have to dig out the discussion
Steven: attributes are one question, and nodesets are another.
Erik: Ideally you'd want to have that.
Steven: I agree
… which does make it different from submission then
Erik: A single node covers most scenarios, but it would be good to be as general as possible
Alain: I think that's too ambitious
… we should keep it as an element, at least in the first version
… submission replace works for me in the case.
Steven: OK Erik?
Erik: Yes.
Steven: How about the initialisation method
Erik: or the parent to the child, we need a method
Steven: I agree that there are several implementation methods possible, but as long as they behave the same from the outside all is well. All we need is a syntax to specify how to say that.
Steven: I now have no more questions, so I will continue with the action.
AOB
Steven: Holiday season is beginniing.
Next call 28 July