15:58:57 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:59:01 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-irc 15:59:01 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:59:02 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), pchampin 15:59:05 agenda: https://beta.w3.org/events/meetings/931e4e54-81ad-4aa3-a39f-84efe4b788c7/20230601T120000/#agenda 15:59:06 clear agenda 15:59:06 agenda+ Scribe: Patel-Schneider, Peter (alternate: Champin, Pierre-Antoine) 15:59:06 agenda+ Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/05/25-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:59:06 agenda+ Update on "First Public Working Draft" (FPWD) 15:59:07 agenda+ Use Case Task Force Review 15:59:10 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 15:59:13 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 15:59:16 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 15:59:19 pfps has joined #rdf-star 16:00:31 present+ 16:00:33 present+ 16:00:37 scribe+ 16:00:38 present+ 16:01:00 present+ 16:01:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:01:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:01:26 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:01:27 present+ 16:01:27 Dominik_T has joined #rdf-star 16:01:39 chair+ 16:01:51 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/05/25-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:01:56 AZ has joined #rdf-star 16:01:59 scribe- 16:02:00 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/06/08-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:02:01 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:12 present+ 16:02:46 present+ 16:02:50 meeting: RDF-star WG Weekly Meeting 16:02:55 Regrets: Enrico 16:02:58 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:02:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:03:17 present+ 16:03:26 present+ 16:03:43 scribe- TallTed 16:03:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:03:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:04:30 zakim, next agenda item 16:04:30 agendum 1 -- Scribe: Patel-Schneider, Peter (alternate: Champin, Pierre-Antoine) -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:04:30 scribe: pfps 16:04:30 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:04:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:04:51 zakim, next agenda item 16:04:51 agendum 1 was just opened, pfps 16:05:03 zakim, next agenda item please 16:05:03 agendum 1 was just opened, pfps 16:05:13 zakim, close item 16:05:13 I don't understand 'close item', pchampin 16:05:26 zakim, close item 1 16:05:26 agendum 1, Scribe: Patel-Schneider, Peter (alternate: Champin, Pierre-Antoine), closed 16:05:28 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:05:28 2. Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/05/25-rdf-star-minutes.html [from agendabot] 16:05:37 zakim, next item 16:05:37 agendum 2 -- Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/05/25-rdf-star-minutes.html -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:05:38 zakim, next item 16:05:40 agendum 2 was just opened, pchampin 16:06:11 olaf has joined #rdf-star 16:06:13 ora: any concerns on the last minutes 16:06:16 present+ 16:06:39 atk: lots of fixes were done to the minutes, thanks 16:06:41 proposal: approve last week's minutes 16:06:48 s/atk/ktk/ 16:06:55 +1 16:06:56 +1 16:06:57 +1 16:06:57 +1 16:07:02 +1 16:07:02 +1 16:07:03 +1 16:07:07 +1 16:07:21 +0 16:07:22 +1 16:07:23 +1 16:07:25 +1 16:07:30 resolved: approve last week's minutes 16:07:43 zakim, next item 16:07:43 agendum 3 -- Update on "First Public Working Draft" (FPWD) -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:08:28 q+ 16:08:28 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:08:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:08:36 ora: what is status of working drafts - some things needed to be fixed 16:08:48 ktk: Semantics and Entailments were not published 16:08:52 https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/511#issuecomment-1572314170 16:09:04 ack pchampin 16:09:28 pchampin: they are officially approved for publication on 6/6 16:09:30 q+ 16:09:39 ack gkellogg 16:09:45 pchampin: snapshots have been generated 16:10:27 q+ 16:10:31 gkellogg: there is a draft PR for common that fixes several things 16:10:33 ack pchampin 16:10:50 gkellogg: I'll put them in for all documents 16:11:05 q+ 16:11:26 pchampin: the last two FPWDs have snapshots so this can be done now 16:11:30 ack ktk 16:11:43 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2023May/0066.html 16:12:03 ktk: email to working group on living standard was sent out 16:12:38 ora: we can point to this email when someone wants to comment on living standard status 16:12:44 q+ 16:12:46 q+ 16:12:57 ack gkellogg 16:13:07 q++ 16:13:12 q+ 16:13:21 ack TallTed 16:13:25 q-+ 16:13:28 gkellogg: the next step is to enable Echidna so that updates are pushed out automatically 16:13:41 regrets+ Doerthe 16:14:07 tallted: what was the discussion last week about SPARQL 1.2 and SPARQL NEXT 16:14:07 ack pchampin 16:14:20 q+ to ask about short-name aliases for older versions of the specs 16:14:46 SPARQL-next is the proposed CG rename. 16:15:04 pchampin: Echidna is configured - I suspect that there needs to be a WG decision to point to before it can go live 16:15:12 ack gkellogg 16:15:12 gkellogg, you wanted to ask about short-name aliases for older versions of the specs 16:15:13 pchampin: I will follow up 16:15:45 gkellogg: we need to come up with something on short names 16:15:56 pchampin: it's on my list 16:16:05 zakim, next item 16:16:05 agendum 4 -- Use Case Task Force Review -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:16:25 scribe+ 16:17:11 pfps: Some use cases are on the repositories, none of them are ideal. if you care about the use cases, comment on the issues. If you want a separate use case create a new issue. 16:17:52 ... I think we start the process now. We have to start working on it now. Thomas Loertsch agreed to work on one but he is not on the TF. 16:18:29 ... Posts to the list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2023May/0071.html 16:18:30 s/TF/WG? 16:18:37 s/TF/WG/ 16:18:37 ... https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2023May/0072.html 16:19:01 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:19:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:19:16 ... That's about it, please help with use-cases. 16:19:25 ... If you help early you get to pick the use cases. 16:19:35 ... If it becomes too much for me I will try to assign people. 16:19:55 ora: I will pick some and get back to you with question. 16:19:59 pfps: please do so 16:20:03 s|s/TF/WG?|| 16:20:14 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:20:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:20:51 pfps: It can be difficult to find email-address of the original submiters. I pinged some with the github handle, that worked at least for one. 16:21:05 zakim, next item 16:21:05 agendum 5 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:21:06 scribe- 16:21:16 scribe+ 16:22:01 ora: no progress on conformance 16:22:17 ora: I'll discuss with Antoine 16:22:51 ora: echindna is in progress 16:23:05 pchampin: short names has to be done 16:23:54 zakim, next item 16:23:54 agendum 6 -- Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:24:08 q+ 16:24:15 q+ 16:24:48 ora: what about the CSS changes 16:25:06 tallted: I commented on the issue 16:25:12 q- 16:25:20 tallted: changing font size is problematic 16:25:38 pfps: was there a referral to the UI people at W3C 16:25:57 pchampin: no 16:26:43 ack gkellogg 16:27:18 gkellogg: change for XML Schema is marked differently - does it matter? 16:27:36 q+ 16:28:20 gkellogg: update to Turtle was waiting on semantics but could probably be done 16:28:33 q+ 16:28:39 ack AndyS 16:28:59 andys: the XML schema is more impactful in SPARQL as it affects functions, etc. 16:29:43 andys: the XML schema links in SPARQL need work 16:30:12 ack pfps 16:30:14 q+ 16:30:25 andys: changes for XML 1.1 are corner cases (year 0, some canonical forms) 16:30:35 q- 16:30:38 ack ora 16:30:46 q+ 16:31:08 ora: how should we describe the changes 16:31:37 andys: it's not XML 1.1 in total 16:32:15 andys: the changes are minor and implementations may already be on 1.1 16:32:36 andys: links generally already go to 1.1 16:32:47 ack Tpt 16:32:52 andys: something useful will go in the change log 16:33:50 tpt: there isn't much change from 1.0 to 1.1 in XML Schema 16:34:43 q+ 16:34:45 andys: there are some issues related to timezones - there are pointers to different descriptions 16:35:03 ack olaf 16:35:32 olaf: floating point is still an issue - I'll work on it this weekend 16:36:50 andys: there should be a way of tracking what is done here and making sure that everything is done 16:37:42 ora: the editorial ones can be merged 16:37:58 gkellogg: i'll reflect the Turtle changes in Trig 16:38:09 building off https://github.com/w3c/rdf-turtle/pull/27 ? 16:38:27 gkellogg: yes 16:39:00 tallted: including more information in the dashboard would be useful 16:39:14 q+ 16:39:23 gkellogg: the repository is already there 16:39:46 ack AndyS 16:39:57 tallted: it would be better to have more information in titles of PRs 16:40:38 gkellogg: HTML from ?BNF needs some work 16:40:47 andys: indeed 16:40:56 gkellogg: I'll work on it 16:41:09 zakim, next item 16:41:09 agendum 7 -- Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:41:36 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2023May/0032.html 16:41:56 q+ to clarify CG name change RDF-next and RDF-12 16:42:29 pchampin: the dataset exchange working group has something on profile-based content negotiation 16:42:59 pchampin: this seems relevant for this working group 16:43:35 q+ to suggest correcting Rob Atkinson's references to `RDF*` rather than `RDF-star` 16:43:43 pchampin: perhaps to switch between classic and quoted-friendly 16:44:14 q+ 16:44:36 pchampin: there will be a call on June 14 1pm CEST and people can ask to join 16:45:09 ora: classic vs quoted is a use case for this 16:45:24 tallted: can this be added to our calendar 16:45:33 pchampin: yes 16:45:35 ora: do it 16:45:41 ack TallTed 16:45:41 TallTed, you wanted to clarify CG name change RDF-next and RDF-12 and to suggest correcting Rob Atkinson's references to `RDF*` rather than `RDF-star` 16:46:01 ack TallTed 16:46:35 tallted: we need to get people to change from RDF* to RDF-star 16:46:40 ora: yes 16:47:05 tallted: what is the change to the SPARQL group? 16:47:24 as a matter of fact, I did recently correct someoneusing "RDF*"; they responded that the "*" was ACTUALLY an asterisk (for a footnote) :-) 16:47:38 tallted: if it is SPARQL NEXT then the readme should be carefully crafted 16:47:45 ack ktk 16:48:29 ktk: we need something that is not specific, particularly is there is a living standard 16:48:51 s/is there is/if there is 16:48:53 tallted: what about "beyond what the RDF-star WG does" 16:49:20 andys: renaming is delicate - some things can't be done 16:49:34 pchampin: I need to check what is possible 16:49:42 q+ 16:49:45 s/someoneusing/someone using 16:50:22 andys: some changes would force everyone to resubscribe, e.g., starting a new group 16:51:14 ktk: changing the CGs readme is possible and should be done 16:51:23 ack gkellogg 16:52:39 gkellogg: renaming on GitHub should be possible and old links will still work 16:53:10 gtk: what are profiles? is there a definition somewhere? 16:53:32 pchampin: there are deliverables including a language 16:53:52 andys: there is an English definition 16:54:00 s/gtk/ktk/ 16:54:06 https://www.w3.org/TR/dx-prof/#definitions 16:54:11 ktk: this will be important at some time 16:54:40 pchampin: this is a data profile, not exactly what we need 16:54:46 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:54:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:54:55 Def. of profile in connegp is https://w3c.github.io/dx-connegp/connegp/#dfn-profile 16:55:19 ora: time 16:55:29 ora: any parting works 16:55:48 olaf has left #rdf-star 16:56:05 ktk: I will be 30 minutes late next week 16:57:51 re RDF* with "an asterisk (for a footnote)", they should be advised to use a dagger instead (like `†` or `‡`) 16:58:50 i|0032|subtopic: profile-based content negotiation 16:59:43 i|clarify|subtopic: SPARQL 1.2 community group 16:59:49 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:59:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/06/01-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 17:08:47 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:24:44 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:32:53 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:38:08 pfps has left #rdf-star 17:46:51 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 17:52:29 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:58:17 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 18:05:22 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:08:06 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:16:19 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 18:22:03 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:22:38 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:24:29 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:32:53 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 18:35:26 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:37:54 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:38:15 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:41:32 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:47:41 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 18:53:19 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:57:01 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 19:05:25 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:17:15 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 19:25:22 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:27:12 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 19:40:27 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:53:11 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:57:59 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 20:02:47 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 20:06:48 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star